12.12/12.13 Tue/Wed Objectives: Recognize types and examples of logical fallacies. Analyze a text rhetorically. warm-up: Logical Fallacy matching! Woohoo!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhetorical Fallacies: Non Sequitur and Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
Advertisements

Constructing a Reasoned Argument argument.ppt
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
ASSIGNMENTS Draft 2 due by 5 p.m. today Study logical fallacies for Jeopardy on Wednesday. Pick out your 3-4 member team Keep working on your paper Exam.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Week 7 Caleb Humphreys. Free Write (10 minutes)  Create a basic outline for your rhetorical analysis. Include your thesis statement and important points.
Writing Skills.
And adding fun to the presentation
Intro. To Socratic Seminar
Hidden Slide for Instructor
Paraphrasing Class #8 February 14, 2013.
A guide to scoring well on Free Response Questions
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Metacognition, Writing and Reading
Writing Paper Three Monday, November 2.
Logical Fallacies Academic Writing, Nov. 12
Writing 101 for Nursing Students
Planting a Naysayer and Answering the Opposition
The Art of Persuasion.
Agenda Reflect/Share EQ findings from Friday
Happy Thursday  Grab the graphic organizer off the front desk and take out your DBQ packet.
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Errors in Reasoning.
RWS 100 – Monday - 9/18/17 Body Paragraphs.
Persuasive Appeals and Logical Fallacies
Evidence and Elaboration
12.4/12.5 Mon/Tue Objectives: Evaluate student grad paper graphs.
3.28/4.9 Wed/Mon Objectives: Analyze texts rhetorically.
Let’s Do It Essay Style! Short 3 Paragraph Essay.
Why is it important to have someone read my essay?
10.4/10.5 notes: grad papering The paper is an 8-10 page (not including works cited) argumentative research paper. You’ve never written one of these.
10.26/10.27 THU/FRI warm-up: synth procedures
Logical Fallacies.
10.12 Thu warm-up: debriefing the released essay (“Wii Girl”)
1.5/ Fri/Mon warm-up: supporting an argument through careful gathering of evidence activity 1: Debriefing “Mystery Text.” activity 2: AP.
12.7/ Wed/Thu warm-up: fallacy warm-up. It’s fallaciously delicious! activity 1: Synth intro and notes; synth 15-minute reading time activity.
RWS 100: Rhetorical Strategery
Year 2: How to help your child
Journal Prompt Jonas says, “I thought there was only us. I thought there was only now.” Do you think that’s a good way to live?
The In-Class Critical Essay
Peer Reviews Tips for the Reviewer.
How to Write a Position Argument
9.25/9.26 Tue/Wed warm-up: Your Thatcher essays
Welcome! September 26th, 2017 Tuesday
The Formal Argument.
Chapter 14: Argumentation
English 1301 Week 8 Thurs, March 8, 2018.
3.16/3.19 Fri/Mon warm-up: AP-styled MC for “B’ham Jail.”
English 1301 Week 5 – June 2.
Reverse Engineering an Essay
Please sit with your Huck Finn mini groups
Your Handy Dandy Guide to Organizing a Proper 5 Paragraph Essay
Tackling Timed Writings
Critical Thinking You’ll have 3 minutes to complete the following. No talking; No Cheating!
Welcome! March 15th, 2017 Wednesday
D5 – Bellringer Let’s take a look and see if you can find any persuasive writing contests that we might participate in as a class (or perhaps just you!).
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
Expository Writing A quick how-to guide.
Logical Fallacies.
Fusion: Integrated Reading and Writing Book 2, Third Edition
Writing to Express an Opinion
Before Bell: Please staple and turn in Self Bio paper to your class tray with RUBRIC attached! Get out your Vocab Books!!!
Revising your Final Essay
Bellringer: Dec 16 In your notebook with your notes for this lesson,
#51 Journal 12/18 Write about your Independent Reading book. 1. Title
Into Class: Monday, October 5th
Editing Process: English 10 Spoken Language
BELLWORK Please take out your planner and homework. Sit silently and wait for me to come around and check both. Not having the assignment in your planner.
Presentation transcript:

12.12/12.13 Tue/Wed Objectives: Recognize types and examples of logical fallacies. Analyze a text rhetorically. warm-up: Logical Fallacy matching! Woohoo! activity 1: Singer Solution seminar activity 2: Logical fallacy super fun extravaganza close: Grad paper reminders HW DUE: “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” HW Tonight: “Love is a Fallacy” and Grad Paper Upcoming: 12.18/12.19: grad paper due! 12.20-1.2: Winter break 1.3/1.4: grammar 3 1.3/1.4: argumentation FRQ (formal) 1.12-1.18: Midterms (argumentation test) 1.23/1.24: Begin diction/syntax/tone unit 1.23/1.24: Ch. 1 of Gatsby due

12.12/12.13 warm-up: Logical fallacy ID fun! I said this activity is fun; therefore you’ll enjoy it! You’ll either have fun with this, or you’ll fail this class! (This is a two for one!) Yeah! Who are you to threaten me with failing a class! After all, you failed Symbolic Logic in college, so you have no business lecturing me. Wha’??? I have the right to free speech; therefore it’s right that I question your authority, chump! Since you seem to think I’ll fail, you must think that the entire school system is a sham. Hey! Why can’t you have fun with this? Everyone else is having fun! I’ll have fun with this activity. And the next one. Soon I’ll be the best student in the entire school! I’ll be valedictorian just like Nick Syracuse! Well, I had fun with this activity, and I passed my grad paper. I guess having fun caused me to pass my grad paper. Post hoc Equivocation false dilemma circular reasoning straw man slippery slope non sequitur bandwagon tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) C, F I B E H G A

Thank you for not eating me, Pete Singer. By the way . . . “[S]ince oysters don’t have central nervous systems, they’re unlikely to experience pain in a way resembling ours—unlike a pig or a herring or even a lobster. [ . . . ] Even monkish ethicist Peter Singer sanctioned oyster eating [ . . . ] before reversing his opinion. [ . . . ] To justify the flip-flop, he wrote that ‘one cannot with any confidence say that these creatures do feel pain, so one can equally have little confidence in saying that they do not feel pain.’ This is unconvincing: We also can’t state with complete confidence that plants do, or do not, feel pain—yet so far Singer hasn’t made a stand against alfalfa abuse.” --from “It’s Ok for Vegans to Eat Oysters” by Christopher Cox Thank you for not eating me, Pete Singer.

12.12/12.13 activity: Singer Solution seminar Sit in small groups of 3-4. Look through the seminar questions together and briefly discuss the text. Write your names/levels of participation at the top of the handout. If you plan on doing no or mixed participation, have paper with you. Seminar will be 25 minutes (that’s a hard timeframe). Spend 2-3 minutes afterward doing the reflection together. Submit all stapled components to the front.

12.12/12.13 activity: Singer Solution seminar What mode does Singer begin his essay with? Is it effective? Does he come back to this mode? Singer identifies himself as a “utilitarian philosopher” (5). What does he mean? Why does Singer cite and quote from Unger’s book Living High and Letting Die? Why does Singer focus most of his argument on helping children? Singer begins using second person pronouns in paragraph 9. Why? When and why does he switch to first person? Paragraph 13 appears to be fallacious. How so? Why does Singer acknowledge that “[h]ypothetical examples can easily become farcical” (16)? Singer claims that morality can’t be decided by “taking opinion polls” (17). How then is morality decided upon? What counterarguments does Singer acknowledge in paragraph 19? How does he refute them? “We are all in that situation” (final paragraph). What situation is that? Who is Singer’s audience? What is Singer trying to persuade his audience to do? What is Singer’s tone? What warrant (overall major premise) is Singer assuming throughout his essay? (There are probably only one or two.)

12.12/12.13 activity: Logical fallacies ID time It’s time for your monthly activity. It’s a fallacies mix-’em-up! Hooray! Find one partner, grab a worksheet and a computer, and get activity-ing. One of the matching doesn’t have a corresponding fallacy. Bonus to anyone who can write-in the answer!

CLOSE and HW 12.12/12.13 CLOSE: Some of you might be leaving early for Non-Denominational Winter Holiday Break Time. If that is you, don’t forget your grad paper and grad paper portfolio is due by Friday. Let’s look at everything that should be in it. HW: “Love is a Fallacy” (all of the things that go along with it) GRAD PAPER (everything housed in a plain, tan file folder): Checklist (everything should be checked besides the final two spaces) (you need to sign it, too) Grad paper rubric (print a new one if you’ve lost it) Final grad paper (w/ electronic submission) Topic approval form Outline First rough draft Final rough draft Any additional drafts and/or materials.