UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Results from Quarter 4 – 2009/10 The results are shown as a percentage of the total responses.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quality assurance Kari Kuulasmaa 1 st EHES Training Seminar, February 2010, Rome.

Advertisements

Advocating for the Health of the Public in Indiana National Voluntary Accreditation for Local Health Departments Created by Indiana Public Health Association.

1 Designing a training programme Module 6 Sessions 9&10.

Results of the Social Services/Education/Registrars/ Housing Benchmarking Exercise 2010 Conducted by the CSLG Benchmarking Group Produced by Sue Austin.

Apprentice Line Managers – Survey results Anna Dent, London Councils.

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Q results.

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.

Part of the Process Improvement Initiative in GCA and Financial Management Add more efficiency to our current final invoicing process Accommodate increasing.

Customer Service.

TAFE NSW Teacher Advisory and Assessment Scheme Policy Training Assessment Activity – TAA1 Action Plan Suitable for Advisor / Assessor – ( Institute Representative.

Professional Career Skills Resumes & Interviews Presentation by Lynda Rohan Monash Careers and Employment October 12, 2005 School.

Chapter: 3 Agile Development

Infrastructure Planning Commission Workshop 2b Working with the IPC: Guidance and issues for promoters.

For several years, NOAA has been assessing how well we are doing at “enabling” local capacity for accurate positioning. This metric:  Makes use of NOAA’s.

Making the most of your Meet the Buyer appointments

QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS QUESTION ASKEDYESNO 1.How long have you received service? 12 months Did a supervisor conduct.

30 th August 2006 ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR SOLAR SERVICE DELIVERY Saliya J. Ranasinghe.

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO 2008 STAFF SURVEY 1073 Respondents Executive Summary Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director 1073.

See How Faculty/Staff Rate Assessment Speakers Follow-up Satisfaction Survey Results for past eight speakers.

Who was there and how many were there? Did they learning something? Will they change behavior? Inputs: Time, Money, Materials Numbers Reached, Frequency.

What would a better complaint handling world look like? Professor Cosmo Graham School of Law

Market Research report Money Transfer Products and service categories Speed Post International Parcel Post Express Parcel Post Postal Life Insurance.

Training and development Education Evaluation: Benefits to Trust and its Learners Clinical skills training Education Quality Team May 2014 Training and.

Fremantle Visitor Information Centre Report 2011.

1 Evaluation. 2 Evaluating The Organization Effective evaluation begins at the organizational level. It starts with a strategic plan that has been carefully.

Richard Philp New Zealand Inland Revenue Department Session No. 7 Conclusions for tax policy and revenue administration from compliance studies, perception.

Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) What data will be included in the 2010 AHAR? October 1, 2009 – September 30, 2010 Seattle and King County.

Continue existing support for Tier 1 key customers Account managers for Tier 2 customers Dedicated helpline and account managers for Tier 3 customers Develop.

Slide 1© Prepared by UMI 2013 Wave 18 Findings for ERM Business Energy January 2014 U T I L I T Y. M A R K E T. I N T E L L I G E N C E C U S T O M E R.

Better Deal for Business Presentation to Providers of Publicly Funded Services Presenter Name Job Title Organisation.

August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.

Redesigning the Website Matt “The Cat” Pittner Dr. Carl “Arizona” Rebman MSIT 573 Summer 2005.

Customer Satisfaction Surveys Colette Nicolle. 2 Overview  Overall response rate and suggestions  Process of analysis and reporting  Investigating.

Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.

SCHOOL BOARD PRESENTATION NOV. 7, Overview of the Process Interviews with Over 125 Stakeholders 3-4 days of On Site Time Four Electronic Surveys.

Chapter 5 – The Client. Definition of the Client n Differences between Internal and External Clients.

1 FY04 ORS Performance Management Manage Information Technology Team Members: Charlie Jones, Ben Ashtiani, Denny Bermudez, La'Tanya Burton, Ron Edwards,

Education Evaluation: Benefits to Trust and its Learners

IT Staff Survey Overview Over 1,300 responses were received. Staff across all faculties and support services were represented. 50 % of respondents.

Graham Heard Customer Services Director National Association of Welfare Rights Advisors Conference Blackpool 11/06/04.

Survey Methodology Four Point Scale Very SatisfiedSatisfiedDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied.

1 FY02 ASA Presentation Provide Administrative Support (2) Presented by: Genia Bohrer Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health 18 November.

Preparing for Work Placement in the Retail Industry.

PrePay Online Survey Results 2014 Based on 348 responses.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting Surveys.

Version 10.0  The High Performance Organisation Ltd Creating A Process Based Management System 1 Welcome Creating a Process Based Management.

Planning for NSS 2013 School of Medicine Manjit Bansal.

Welcome to HR Presents July 23, :30 am – 12:00 pm Milton Hall, Room 85.

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l POA 3: SUPPORTING VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.

Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPT Slides t/a Office Skills: A Practical Approach 3e by Horsfall & Cairns Slides prepared by June Breheny.

Powered by Foster Parent Survey 2015 Tuesday, July 28, 2015.

Improved avaliability for respondents – Respondent service Public Sector Surveys Unit Statistics Sweden.

 How to Reach Us  Service Support Levels  Support Definitions & Standards  Response Levels  Point of Contact  Our Escalation Processes  Expect a.

Mitcham Medical Centre PATIENT SURVEY –Purpose of the survey was to assess the quality of our services and review areas requiring improvement –Survey.

Volunteer Home Visitor Key tasks: Visit prospective adopters’ homes to ensure that it will be a suitable environment for the particular dog. Complete a.

Communication & record keeping. Types of communication VerbalGiving instructions to others, talking to clients, taking messages WrittenConfirmation of.

Valuing Complaints - Developing a Performance and Learning Culture College Development Network Complaints Handling Advisory Group 6 May 2015 Paul McFadden.

Development Management Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015/16 Economy, Planning and Employability Services Reported Prepared May 2016.

Report on the evaluation of the Independent prison Visitors System by Ms Jacqui Gallinetti, CLC UWC.

Consistent & Reliable Customer Service Unit 4 P2 + M2.

HUMAN RESOURCES | SERVICE EXCELLENCE SURVEY

Stakeholder Survey Prepared for: Seafish Date: May 2016.

SCHOOL OF ART DESIGN & MEDIA NSS POSITIVITY 2016

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

Volunteer Role Description for: Location: Main contact:

Why Accreditation, why IQIPS?

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

Presentation transcript:

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Results from Quarter 4 – 2009/10 The results are shown as a percentage of the total responses

How satisfied are you with UKASs overall service to your organisation over the last year?

In the experience of your organisation how does last years service compare with the previous year?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS understood your business needs?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS staff were easy to make contact with?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS generally responded to your needs in a timely manner?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your pre visit arrangements well?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS assessment team prepared well for your visit?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS conducted the visit well?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS assessment team had the right skills and knowledge?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS assessment team had the right attitude?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS application of the accreditation requirements was consistent with the previous year?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your improvement actions promptly?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your technical enquiries well?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your administrative enquiries well?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your invoicing and related enquiries efficiently and conveniently?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your extension of scope requests promptly?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS was effective in promoting awareness of accreditation and the UKAS brand?

Over the last 12 months, how satisfied are you that UKAS provided value for money?