Federal Changes? Oregon OSHA Changes to Federal WPS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHM’s commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Advertisements

Slips / Trips / Falls Food Service Safety. Applicable OSHA Standards 1.Keep all places of employment clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition. 29.
OSHAs Revised Bloodborne Pathogens Standard Outreach and Education Effort 2001.
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) Update John Crawford, Chief Industrial Waste Compliance Section Office of Land Quality.
Revised Bloodborne Pathogens Standard WAC Safer Medical Device and Sharps Injury Recordkeeping Requirements.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Field Worker Safety Inspection: What To Expect… Alex McVicker Agricultural Biologist.
Protections for Agricultural Workers Agricultural Hazard Communication Act Texas Right to Know (RTK) Regulations.
OSHA’s Revised Bloodborne Pathogens Standard Outreach and Education Effort 2001.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens Standard Amber Hogan, Industrial Hygienist OSHA National Office Washington DC.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Lindsey Holderman & Miranda Moore.
OSHA Safety and Health Regulations Related to SPF Applications Module Three: Personal Protective Equipment.
Responsibilities for Agricultural Employers Agricultural Hazard Communication Act Texas Right to Know (RTK) Regulations Local Fire Chief Notification.
Pesticide Use in Schools 2013 James Belt Ohio Department of Agriculture
Overview and Implementation Schedules Richard Keigwin, Director EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.
Pesticide Labeling Reeves Petroff
THE WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD Pesticide Emphasis Program Oregon OSHA.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Bloodborne Pathogens Occupational Safety and Health Course for Healthcare Professionals.
Personal Protective Equipment
EPA Update on Pesticide Worker Safety Issues February 7, 2013 Richard Pont Certification and Worker Protection Branch Office of Pesticide Programs.
PRIVATE APPLICATOR RECERTIFICATION
OSHA’s Revised Bloodborne Pathogens Standard Heritage Group Safety.
Clean Air Act Section 112(r) Federal Program Update U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Prevention and Preparedness February 15, 2007 CUPA Training.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
The OSH Act, Standards, & Liabilities
Bloodborne Pathogens 29 CFR Components of the Standard Exposure Control Plan Methods of Compliance –Universal Precautions –Engineering and.
Cholinesterase Monitoring ~ What Washington is Learning Margaret Tucker WA State Department of Agriculture.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
NEW PHOSTOXIN LABELING
Worker Protection Standard 40 CFR –
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Proposed Product Labeling for Spray/Dust Drift Jay Ellenberger Acting Director Field.
The Worker Protection Standard is a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the protection of agricultural workers that are.
{ The Updated WPS: What’s New and What to Expect.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Interest Approach Begin a discussion with your students about how you believe in having a law that requires everyone in a car to wear a seat belt. Encourage.
Worker Protection Standard Overview Webinar for WPS PREP, WPS PIRT & PREP Compliance & Enforcement Attendees April 28, 2016.

Application Exclusion Zone/ Protections During Applications Region 3 WPS Training April 11-12, 2016.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Overview of Revisions to the EPA Agricultural Worker Protection Standard for pesticides Pennsylvania farm bureau April 27, 2017.
Revisions to EPA’s Agricultural Worker Protection Standard
EPA WPS Frequently Asked Questions [version released April 14, 2016]
Worker Protection Standard (wps)
Presenter name(s) Presenter title
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Updates to the Federal Worker Protection Standard
Fumigation Updates Presented by: Blanca Enriquez-Pratt
Updates to the Federal Worker Protection Standard
Budgeting Help Session
GTEC 2017 Annual UST Management & Compliance Assistance Seminar
Final Rule to Protect Workers from Beryllium Exposure
Compliance Made Simple Presents:
Clayton Seamons redbaronag.com
Informal document GRPE-74-20
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
EPA Worker Protection Training
The Agricultural Worker Protection Regulation & the Applicator Certification Regulation are Part of EPA’s Pesticide Worker Safety Program Strategic Mission.
Amalia Neidhardt MPH, CIH, CSP Senior Safety Engineer
Presentation transcript:

Federal Changes? Oregon OSHA Changes to Federal WPS Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Federal Changes? Oregon OSHA Changes to Federal WPS Rose Kachadoorian Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) Oregon Association of Nurseries Annual Meeting Salishan Lodge & Golf Resort November 3, 2017

Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Compliance Enforcement in Oregon Background Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Compliance Enforcement in Oregon Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA): Enforces label provisions of WPS, usually found in “Agricultural Use Requirements” box Restricted Entry Interval (REI) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Background OR-OSHA Enforces: Other aspects of WPS, including workplace compliance aspects of: training of workers, recordkeeping, placement of decontamination supplies, notification information, etc.

Provided adequate enforcement guidance and educational materials, and NASDA requested for EPA to delay implementation of all revised WPS (2015) until January 2, 2018 or until EPA has: Provided adequate enforcement guidance and educational materials, and (2) Provided states the financial resources necessary to effectively implement the rule changes, and assist the regulated community with compliance activities.  This petition was denied

May 11, 2017: EPA informally grants petition via letter. Another Petition Petition from NASDA to postpone compliance date for all WPS provisions to at least Jan 2018. May 11, 2017: EPA informally grants petition via letter. EPA grants request to extend implementation date of all revised WPS provisions until necessary guidance & trainings have been completed, which would allow states to successfully implement the changes. EPA stated that they would “soon begin the regulatory process to formally extend the compliance date for all revised provisions of the WPS.” However, EPA has not published anything in the Federal Register, and therefore officially the compliance date has not changed yet. This has lead to confusion on the national level. Feb 21, 2017

NATIONAL For National Program (OR-OSHA is different) On-Farm AEZ Off Farm AEZ

Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) entirely Age 18 requirement However, there is a lot of discussion at the national level about changing the revised 2015 WPS (original was from 1992) Eliminating the: Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) entirely Age 18 requirement Designate Representative ODA has been told that EPA can not just open up for comment certain portions of the revised WPS, and leave other provisions in place. EPA would have to open up the entire document and temporarily resort back to the 1992 version of WPS.

OR-OSHA adopted all EPA WPS provisions in 2017 (except for AEZ). Provisions in OR delayed until Jan. 2. 2018 OR-OSHA has proposed a rule. Open for comments For National Program (OR-OSHA is different) Annual Training On-Farm AEZ Off Farm AEZ

OR-OSHA filed proposed rules on October 13, 2017 Comment period is from November 1 – December 15, 2017 Hearings held in following locations: CAPACES Leadership Institute Woodburn 11/15/17 6pm Woodburn Grange Woodburn 11/16/17 11am Pine Grove Grange Hood River 11/29/17 10am Medford Public Library Medford 12/05/17 11am Medford Public Library Medford 12/05/17 6pm

Proposed AEZ distances An AEZ of 150’ when label requires handler to use respiratory protection, (air blast/aerial, or spray droplet size <294 microns) An AEZ of 100’ when label requires handler to use eye protection and gloves for PPE, and An AEZ of 25’ when not applied aerially or through airblast sprayer and sprayed from a height of greater than 12’’ from the planting medium and droplet size >294 microns

Appropriately trained and equipped handlers involved in the application are not subject to AEZ rules

OR OSHA proposing to require that prior to pesticide applications: All doors and windows closed Any air intake devices or mechanisms turned off Provisions to protect or store personal or household items not located in an agricultural structure A closeable storage area for footwear to prevent tracking of pesticide into the structure Personal or household items not located in an agricultural structure: outdoor kitchens, children’s toys, playsets, etc.

Instructions on closing windows and doors to minimize exposure to outside air regardless of whether they are staying inside the enclosed agricultural structure or evacuating during nearby pesticide applications Instructions on how to close potential air intakes and any other measures to minimize exposure to outside air during nearby pesticide applications The start and stop times for remaining inside the enclosed agricultural structures and how to determine when the application equipment is in range Proposed rule would require employers to provide the following info to occupants of an enclosed agricultural structure in the AEZ prior to the pesticide application: This would apply to occupants of ALL enclosed structures (labor housing and other structures within AEZ)

Info on how to prevent and reduce pesticide exposure Instructions as to whether people can, as appropriate, evacuate or stay in an enclosed agricultural structure, how to maintain proactive measures, and how long they must remain outside the AEZ Instructions on how to protect personal or household items in the AEZ from potential contamination In addition, the agricultural employer will ensure that all adult occupants of enclosed agricultural structures have access to: Information station located in close proximity to ag structures that contains info on pending applications, with a mean of alerting occupants to changing info. Info on how to prevent and reduce pesticide exposure Info about location of pesticide safety information

Determining Shelter in Place Option Under the proposal, the following conditions will be used to determine whether to evacuate the AEZ or stay in an enclosed agricultural structure: When the pesticide applied doesn’t require the use of a respirator, workers or other persons can remain in the enclosed agricultural structure if: The enclosed ag structure provides protection from pesticide spray contacting the skin Enclosed ag structures have walls, ceilings, and floors that minimize the entry of outside air when doors, windows, and air intakes are closed When the pesticide being applied is a fumigant, a smoke, or a fog, structures must be fully evacuated When the pesticide applied requires the use of a respirator, then any worker or other person must evacuate the AEZ

Innovation Incentive As a way to encourage innovation, OR-OSHA may grant approval for AEZs that differ from the rule requirements yet meet the intent of the rules through OR-OSHA’s Variance process

Examples: EPA’s Drift Reduction Technology Advanced application practices for handlers in the prevention of spray drift The use of two applicators to improve communication and monitoring of weather conditions