Stanford Prison Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Advertisements

Prisoner-Guard Experiment Stanford University Summer “What happens when you put good people in an evil place?
The Stanford Prison Experiment A study into the effects of prison life.
The Stanford Prison Experiment Max Rowe. The Purpose The Stanford prison experiment was a study of the psychological effect of becoming a prisoner or.
Stanford Prison Experiment And you thought what happened to Little Albert was bad…
Stanford Prison Experiment Wyatt G., Connor A., Liz T., Brianna H. Mrs. Menzen English Honors 9 April, 2015.
Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students.
Helen Harton, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of Northern Iowa.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Power of the Situation (cont.)
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.
Amendment Task Cards How to use: 1.Cut out and post a set around the room 2.Print multiple sets in slides format for each group/pair 3.Have students record.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.4 Discuss ethical considerations in qualitative research.
In re Gault The Supreme Court Establishes Rules for Juveniles.
Sight Words.
The Situation By: Joselipana. Instructions: Choose the word that best relates to and describes the given situations.
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
 Participants are formally asked to indicate their agreement to participate  They should be informed on the purpose of the experiment and their rights.
The Stanford Prison Experiment 1 Video Clip. Background 1971 – Stanford University Experiment overseen by Dr. Philip Zimbardo –PH. D. in Psychology from.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
PHILIP ZIMBARDO & THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT AJ Malisheski.
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE. What was the Experiment? The Milgram Experiment was a social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University.
Group Processes. The Nature of Groups  The Nature of Groups Group - two or more people who influence each other Group - two or more people who influence.
Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment. Volunteers More than 70 applicants answered ad & were given interviews & personality tests to eliminate candidates.
Social Thinking. Social Psychology ● scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another o BIG emphasis of social psychology is.
CHAPTER 18.  Attitude – any belief that includes an evaluation of some object, person, or event and predisposes us to act in certain way toward that.
THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO Island of Monte Cristo.
CRJ 303 ASH Complete Class Check this A+ tutorial guideline at CRJ 303 Week 1 DQ.
Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”
ESSENTIAL WORDS.
RECAP What is the name of Zimbardo’s research?
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Effects of status and social power within groups
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
THE DAILY NEWS DON’T ASK
Welcome to the Fuller Adolescent Detention Center
Acts 16:16-17 Once when we (Paul, Silas, Luke and others) were going to the place of prayer, we were met by a female slave who had a spirit by which she.
The Background You are 35, and you live in California, in a house that is only blocks away from your parent’s house. On a sunny day your parents decide.
God sees the truth but waits digital graphic novel
Groups and Obedience The Stanford Prison Experiment
Past simple Welcome to our first lesson
RECAP Outline Asch’s procedure using APRC (aim, procedure, results, conclusion) Briefly outline 3 AO3 evaluation points for the research Which explanation.

Stanford Prison Experiment
Chapter Seven Corrections.
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior
Moral Reasoning.
Lesson 4: Paul and the Predictor
Obedience to Authority & the Psychology of Evil
Principal: Radewin Awada Important Phone Numbers
Fry Word Test First 300 words in 25 word groups
What Would You Do?.
Types of Conflict in Writing
The of and to in is you that it he for was.
Simple, Compound, Complex, Compound-complex
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Clarence sues Louie You decide the outcome.
How would you answer this question??
Stanford Prison Experiment
TIME & PLACE REFERENCES QUESTIONS BASIC REPORTING VERBS
Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”
What are the basic rights and freedoms of the American people?
What do examiners want ? Answering questions about usefulness
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Presentation transcript:

Stanford Prison Experiment Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students

Overview Summer of 1971 Mock prison setting in the basement of a building on campus. Called in 24 volunteers who’s mental and physical health were tested before participating. Supposed to last two weeks…

After only 6 days… the experiment was shut down…

Procedure “Criminals” were picked up by police officers at their homes on the morning of the experiment. “The suspect was picked up at his home, charged, warned of his legal rights, spread-eagled against the police car, searched, and handcuffed -- often as surprised and curious neighbors looked on.”

Procedure Run like a real prison. “There were no windows or clocks to judge the passage of time, which later resulted in some time-distorting experiences.”

Procedure Prisoners wore a “smock” like garment with nothing underneath. These had the prisoners ID number printed on the front and back. They also wore a heavy chain around their right ankle, rubber sandals, and a nylon stocking on their head. What was the purpose of these garments?

Procedure Guards were given no specific instructions. They had guidelines, and were told to make and enforce their own rules that would maintain order in the prison. Guards often used pushups as a form of punishment.

The Rebellion Prisoners began to rebel on the second day. “The guards broke into each cell, stripped the prisoners naked, took the beds out, forced the ringleaders of the prisoner rebellion into solitary confinement, and generally began to harass and intimidate the prisoners.”

Rebellion Since they could only have 3 guards working at one time, they devised a new technique for keeping the prisoners under control. “Privileged Cell…uniforms back, beds back, and could wash and brush their teeth…also got to eat special food in the presence of the other prisoners who had temporarily lost the privilege of eating. The effect was to break the solidarity among prisoners.”

Rebellion Guards then switched around some of the privileged and unprivileged prisoners… what do you think happened then? -Divide and conquer- Labeling Theory Prisoner #5401

Rebellion The first prisoner to be released lasted 36 hours, he was suffering from “acute emotional disturbances”. Criticized for being weak. Told he couldn’t leave.

Rebellion Were allowed a visiting period the next day. Seemed to raise spirits. Some parents responded very negatively to the state their children were in. Became part of the experiment

The Escape Guard overheard of a plan to escape after visit hours that day. The prisoner they had let go the day before was coming back for revenge! “The plan was to dismantle our jail after the visitors left, call in more guards, chain the prisoners together, put bags over their heads, and transport them to a fifth floor storage room until after the anticipated break in.”

No escape… It was just a rumor, but it made the prison guards crack down even harder on the inmates. Brought in a Catholic priest to evaluate the prison setting. “The priest's visit further blurred the line between role-playing and reality.” One prisoner became ill, other prisoners were still treated the same.

End Prisoners were given “parole hearings”. “First, when we asked prisoners whether they would forfeit the money they had earned up to that time if we were to parole them, most said yes. Then, when we ended the hearings by telling prisoners to go back to their cells while we considered their requests, every prisoner obeyed, even though they could have obtained the same result by simply quitting the experiment.” The prisoners and guards had completely fallen into their roles. Was this an accurate depiction of jail life? If so, what does it say about our prison system?