Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Advertisements

The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: – Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges and individual.
The Federal Courts. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: – Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges and individual with violating.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman.
The Judiciary Chapter 14. Learning Objectives Analyze the implications of the adversarial process Explain the structure of the federal court system Compare.
The Federal Courts Agenda Quiz Overview of the Judicial Court System
The Judiciary Term of Office Life. Roots of the Federal Judiciary not much time spent on Article III Framers saw little threat of tyranny by judiciary.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 13. Founding of Judicial Branch Judicial Act of 1789 basically established the current Federal set-up of the Judicial Branch.
To Accompany Comprehensive, Alternate, and Texas Editions American Government: Roots and Reform, 10th edition Karen O’Connor and Larry J. Sabato  Pearson.
The Federal Judiciary. A Dual Judicial System In the U.S., we have a dual judicial system consisting of a national court system, but also separate court.
1 Federal Judiciary Lesson Role of the Courts What is the role of courts - resolve political issues? Presidential election Presidential election.
Chapter 12 The Judiciary. Common Law Tradition  Common law = judge-made law; originated in England; derived from prevailing customs  Precedent = court.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 16 The Role of the Courts.
The Judicial Branch. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Understanding the Federal Judiciary The Framers viewed the federal.
The Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s term runs from the first Monday in October through the end of June.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16. Our System is Adversarial.
Federal Court System. Powers of Federal Courts U.S. has a dual court system (Federal & State) State courts have jurisdiction over state laws Federal courts.
Chapter 16 The Federal Courts. Article III: The Judicial Branch Job under Separation of Powers: Job under Separation of Powers: Interpret the Law Marbury.
The United States Supreme Court. Constitutional Basis Supreme Court is established in Article III of the Constitution There is one Supreme Court. There.
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Processing Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Law and Legal Principles Supreme Court Decision.
Copyright 2006 Prentice Hall Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive Shea, Green, and Smith Living Democracy Chapter 4 The Judiciary.
Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby & Light Government by the People Chapter 14 The.
Chapter 16. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one.
Structure and Function of the American Judiciary.
Chapter 14 The Judiciary. Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Court Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 12 Courts of Appeals 94 US District Courts.
Judicial Branch Article III U.S. Constitution. Criminal Law Crime: any act that is illegal because society and government considers it harmful Criminal.
The Judicial Branch Unit V.
The Function of the Supreme Court
Article Three- The Judiciary
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court
The Federal Courts The Judiciary.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Judicial Branch.
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © 2008
Objectives 1. Circumstances required for a case to be brought before the Supreme Court. 2. How do politics enter into Supreme Court decisions? 3. Why is.
The U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s term runs from the first Monday in October through the end of June.
The Federal Courts Chapter 19.
American Government and Politics Today
Chapter 18 “The Federal Court System”
The Federal Court System Chapter 11
Nomination and Confirmation How the Court Works
Chapter 18 Judicial Branch.
Chapter 14 The US Supreme Court.
Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive
REVIEW 1) What is jurisdiction? 2) Define concurrent jurisdiction.
The Court System.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 7.
 Chapter 9 The Judiciary
The Judiciary Chapter 14.
The Federal Courts.
The Judiciary: Blending Law and Politics
Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive
The Federal Court System
The Federal Courts.
Welcome! Today is Thursday, March 29, 2018
Chapter 18 Judiciary.
The Judicial Branch.
Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
 Chapter 10 The Judiciary
Federal Judiciary Lesson 12.
How should we handle conflict?
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Chapter 16 The Judicial Branch.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Presentation transcript:

Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby & Light Government by the People Chapter 14 The Judiciary: The Balancing Branch Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Supreme Court’s Shift to the Right When Sandra Day O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court, a pivotal swing vote disappeared George W. Bush’s appointments of Samuel Alito and John Roberts shifted the Court to the right Example: 2007 decision to strike down as unconstitutional the use of race in assigning pupils to individual public schools Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Understanding the Federal Judiciary The Framers viewed the federal judiciary as an important check against Congress and the president But the judiciary has no influence over the “sword” or the “purse” Judicial power is ensured via: Insulation from public opinion Insulation from the rest of government Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Judicial Review The power of a court to refuse to enforce a law or government regulation that, in the opinion of the judges, conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or, in a state court, the state constitution Only a constitutional amendment or a later Supreme Court can modify the Court’s decisions Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Adversarial System The Inquisitorial System Adversary System The Adversarial System Judges serve as relatively passive and detached referees who do not argue with attorneys or challenge evidence The Inquisitorial System Judges take an active role in discovering and evaluating evidence, will question witnesses, and intervene as deemed necessary Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Adversary System Court of law is a neutral arena where two parties argue their differences The federal government brings criminal cases The federal judiciary decides the cases Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Types of Legal Disputes Criminal Law Crimes against the public order Liberty is at stake Right to government-provided attorneys Right to trial by jury Civil law Relations between individuals, and their legal rights Typically monetary punishment Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Scope of Judicial Power Judicial power is passive and reactive Power only to decide justiciable disputes Harm must have been done Case must be ripe Case cannot be moot Case cannot be political Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Prosecuting Cases U.S. Department of Justice Led by attorney general Assisted by solicitor general Provides public defenders Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Types of Federal Courts Article III (Constitutional) Versus Article I (Legislative) Courts Original Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear a case “in the first instance” Appellate Jurisdiction The authority of a court to review decisions made by lower courts Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Level One: District Courts District courts hear nearly 258,000 civil cases and more than 68,000 criminal cases annually Use both grand juries and petit juries District judges are appointed by the president, subject to confirmation by the Senate, and hold office for life Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Level Two: Circuit Courts of Appeals The 11 U.S. Judicial Circuits Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Level Three: The Supreme Court Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Judicial Federalism: State and Federal Courts Dual court system Two court systems, state and federal, exist and operate at the same time in the same geographic areas Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Politics of Appointing Federal Judges No Constitutional requirements Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Making the Initial Choices Article II: --President has power to appoint --Senate has power of advice and consent Senatorial courtesy Chief Justice John Roberts (far right) congratulates Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. at his swearing-in ceremony as a new member of the Supreme Court Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Senate Advice and Consent Senate Confirmation Hearings Except for Robert Bork, most judicial nominees have refused to answer questions that might reveal how they would decide a case Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Role of Party, Race, and Gender Since FDR, only 10 percent of judicial appointments have gone to candidates of the opposition party Jimmy Carter brought increased diversity to the lower courts Ronald Reagan appointed fewer minorities, but was the first to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court Nearly 50 percent of Bill Clinton’s appointees were women and minorities Roughly 32 percent of George W. Bush’s nominees have been women and minorities Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Role of Judicial Philosophy Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Reform of the Selection Process The lengthy and embattled confirmation hearings of Robert Bork (1987) and Clarence Thomas (1991) led many to ask if the confirmation process was in need of reform Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

How Do Cases Rise to the Supreme Court? Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Eight Steps to Judgment Reviewing appeals Writ of certiorari In forma pauperis Docket Granting the appeal Briefing the case Amicus curiae briefs Holding the oral argument Meeting in conference Explaining the decision Opinions of the Court Dissenting opinion Concurring opinion Writing the opinion Releasing the opinion Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

The Supreme Court Docket Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: The Chief Justice Appointed by the president upon confirmation by the Senate Responsible for assigning judges to committees, responding to proposed legislation that affects the judiciary, and delivering the annual Report on the State of the Judiciary Former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: Law Clerks Chosen by each justice Increased number over time, leading to longer and more elaborate opinions Debate over how much influence on Court decisions Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: The Solicitor General Represents the federal government before the Supreme Court Files amicus curiae briefs in cases in which the federal government is not a party Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: Citizens and Interested Parties Also may file amicus curiae briefs Increasingly used to counter the positions of the solicitor general and the government Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

After the Court Decides Sometimes remands the case Uncertain effect on individuals who are not immediate parties to the suit Decisions are sometimes ignored Difficult to implement decisions requiring the cooperation of large numbers of officials Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Limits on Judicial Action: Adherence to Precedent Stare Decisis The rule of precedent, whereby a rule or law contained in a judicial decision is commonly viewed as binding on judges whenever the same question is presented Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Limits on Judicial Action: Congress and the President Changing the numbers Changing the jurisdiction Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman

Debating the Proper Role of the Courts An independent judiciary is a hallmark of a constitutional democracy and a free society Yet, judicial independence is often criticized when judges make unpopular decisions Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman