Commissioning the LIGO detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Advertisements

Cascina, January 24, 2005 Status of GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO-G W Raab: Searching for Gravitational Waves w/ LIGO1 Why Has Duty Cycle Been Lower in Livingston.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
1 LIGO-G D LIGO Commissioning PAC Meeting, 18 May 2005, LIGO Livingston Joe Giaime, LSU & LLO, for the entire commissioning team. PAC Meeting,
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Commissioning Report LSC Meeting, Hanover August 19, 2003 Peter Fritschel, MIT.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Status of LIGO Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala LIGO-G D Commissioning and detector improvements for S4.
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Optical Gyroscopes for Ground Tilt Sensing in Advanced LIGO The need for low frequency tilt sensing The optics in Advanced LIGO’s suspensions must be very.
G Amaldi Meeting 2015, Gwangju, South Korea1 Status of LIGO June 22, 2015 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory (on behalf of the LIGO Scientific.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Baton Rouge LSC Meeting, March 2007 LIGO-G Z.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, March 16, 2004 Peter Fritschel.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
The VIRGO detection system
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
First Lessons from the Advanced LIGO Integration Testing
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory November 8, 2005
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Thermal Compensation Installation at LHO
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Lessons Learned from Commissioning of Advanced Detectors
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Advanced Virgo ISC subsystem
Presentation transcript:

Commissioning the LIGO detectors Stability and sensitivity improvements October 21, 2004 Nergis Mavalvala

LIGO : Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory 3 k m ( ± 1 s ) 4 km 2 km LA 4 km

Initial LIGO

H1 noise history (science design) S3 S2 S1

Interferometer Layout laser

L1 Estimated Noise Limits for S2 (expected)

H1 Noise Model

Recent commissioning efforts Reliability & Stability Seismic retrofit at LLO: Hydraulic External Pre-Isolator (HEPI) Sensitivity Operate at high power: achieve designed optical gain Laser power increase Thermal compensation system (TCS)

Seismic Noise Motion of the earth is a few mm at low frequencies Passive and active seismic isolation Amplify mechanical resonances Get isolation above a few Hz

Daily Variability of Seismic Noise RMS motion in 1-3 Hz band day night Livingston Displacement (m) Hanford PRE-ISOLATOR REQUIREMENT Time (GPS seconds)

Hydraulic External Pre-Isolation: HEPI at LLO

X-arm length disturbance on a noisy afternoon

HEPI summary Remaining tasks Summary Complete commissioning of final six chambers Sensor and whitening filter optimization Scripting, safeties, man-machine interface software Summary All hardware installed Crucial one-arm test completed successfully LIGO should soon have two sites capable of night and day operation with reasonable duty cycle Pre-Isolator is first Advanced LIGO subsystem shown to work at required specification in an Observatory setting

H1 noise history (science design) S3 S2 S1

Acoustic Noise Coupling Peaks occur in 80-1000 Hz band 10 to 100x the design sensitivity Source of H1-H2 correlations Acoustic Excitations loud quiet

Acoustic Mitigation Acoustic enclosures around output tables Reduce couplings Float optics tables Simplify beam path New stiffer periscope Reduce source Muffle fan noise at electronics crates Racks on isolation legs Move racks Reduce HVAC noise Insulate mechanical room 18

H2 Faraday Isolator Replacement Larger aperture to reduce beam clipping Reduce thermally induced drift at REFL

H1 noise history (science design) S3 S2 S1

What is shot noise? Laser light comes in discrete packets of photons Poisson statistics of light arrival times at the gravitational-wave port photodiodes Statistical fluctuation in detected photons appears as phase (i.e. length or strain) noise in interferometer Signal-to-noise ratio increases as the square-root of laser power in the ifo

What can we do about shot noise? Increase laser power Lasers refurbishing, now running at ~8W Approximately 4W incident on interferometers Input optics-train modified and aligned for better throughput Additional photodiodes added to antisymmetric port Additional power produces “thermal lensing” in interferometer optics Need Thermal Compensation System (TCS) Ensure other high-frequency noise sources are reduced accordingly E.g. “oscillator phase noise”

Thermal Compensation System (TCS) Mirrors of the interferometer absorb laser light and heat up  thermal lensing Mirror profile (shape) distorted according to the laser beam and absorption profiles Use external laser beam shaped to match the input beam to the mode supported in the arm cavities CO2 Laser ITM ZnSe Viewport Over-heat pattern Inner radius = 4cm Outer radius =11cm Over-heat Correction Under-heat Correction Inhomogeneous Correction

Two CO2 lasers installed on H1 To input test mass (ITM) High Reflectivity surface

TCS on the power recycled Michelson Beam images at antisymmetric port No Heating 30 mW 60 mW 90 mW Best match 120 mW 150 mW 180 mW Input beam

Output Mode Cleaner -- The Good Carrier contrast defect improves by 20x With OMC: carrier 2% of total power Makes it possible to reduce modulation depth Removes offset corresponding to 10-12 m Reduced AM noise coupling: factor of 60 at 3 kHz Reduced oscillator phase noise coupling: factor of 2 at 3 kHz ASI signal decreases by a factor of 7 “ASI locking” symmetrizes RF sidebands Would be able to operate with a single PD at AS port!

Output Mode Cleaner -- The Bad

Output Mode Cleaner -- The Ugly Higher order modes and beam jitter generate a PDH-like signal Elliptical beam is a problem Triangular cavity geometry is a problem beam jitter 5o

High-frequency noise improvements Recent high-frequency noise improvement by factor of 2 to 4 Thermal compensation required to support this gain in sensitivity (otherwise thermal lensing would limit such gains)

Many other key commissioning efforts underway, including Parallel efforts Many other key commissioning efforts underway, including Control of angular degrees-of-freedom (d.o.f.) All 14 angular d.o.f. controlled on Hanford 4km interferometer Input pointing into the interferometers controlled Acoustic mitigation Reducing control noise from other feedback systems in the interferometers

Time Line 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Inauguration First Lock 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Inauguration First Lock Full Lock all IFO Now Engineering E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Runs S1 S2 S3 S4 (expected) Science First Science Data

Looking ahead L1 interferometer: H1 interferometer: H2 interferometer: Finish Hydraulic external pre-Isolator (HEPI) Get good spectrum back Implement improvements from LHO 4km interferometer H1 interferometer: High power operations “output mode cleaner” test version 2 New frequency and intensity stabilization, “common mode” boards, non-resonant sideband photodiodes on interferometer reflected output port Optimize dewhitening for new low-noise digital-to-analog converters H2 interferometer: Implement improvements from the Hanford 4km interferometer Expect 4-6 week science run beginning Jan 2005 On track to reach design sensitivity and begin an extended science run summer 2005