MSP SHOWCASE: Intel® Math September 27, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Annual Evaluation Some Considerations ems&tl Core Group September 13, 2013.
Developing Mathematical Practices for Number, Operations and Algebraic Reasoning: Grades K -5 Developed by Dr. Jenny K. Tsankova with support from Teachers21.
Math Teachers' Circles – Math Teachers' Circles – Themes from Final Surveys Diana White – joint with Brianna Donaldson and Adam Ruff University of Colorado.
Mathematics Learning Communities (MLC) MLC Facilitator Training Overview Regional Science Resource Center Regional Science Resource Center University of.
CAIM Inservice: November 15, Focus: 2-3 topics focused on deeply in each grade. 2.Coherence: Concepts logically connected from one grade to.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Steve Klass, Nadine Bezuk & Jane Gawronski
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
East Baton Rouge Parish School System Better Schools. Better Futures. UTILIZING MATH RESOURCES AND STRATEGIES EFFECTIVELY January 5, 2015.
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
1 Massachusetts Intel ® Mathematics Initiative (MIMI)
Unit 3: Equal or Not Key Standards
Facilitating Teacher Growth for State-wide Student Success in Mathematics Professional Learning for Intermediate Grades.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Review Focus and Coherence A Closer look at Rigor.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
DR. CECELIA LAURIE DR. JULIE HERRON UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA The Mathematical Education of Teachers: One University’s Approach.
2 nd Mathematics Meeting Wednesday, November 16 Agenda.
Robert Kaplinsky Melissa Canham
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Developing Teacher Content Knowledge Math Institutes LAUSD & CSUDH Partnership Eunice Krinsky, Ph.D., CSUDH Odette Board, M.A., LAUSD.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
Presentation of Learning- CONNECT-ED Summer 2011 AKA… “Nerdy” Reflections.
Online Professional Development: One State’s Algebra 1 Initiative Ernise S. Singleton, PhD Educational Technology Consultant.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
ALM15/July2008/Schmitt1 Initial Findings from Research on the TIAN Project A New Professional Learning Model for Adult Education Math Teachers Mary Jane.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
Governor’s Teacher Network Project Submitted by: Suzanne K. Jones August 2014-June 2015.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Intel ® Math William McCallum Institute for Mathematics and Education January 12, 2010 “Education and Innovation will be the currency of the 21 st century.”
Max Marchitello and Will Ragland September 16, 2015
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Decompressing Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Division Presented by: DeAnn Huinker Melissa Hedges Kevin McLeod Jennifer Bay-Williams Association.
Curriculum Focal Points PK-8— A Quest for Coherence Released September 12, 2006.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
TPACK & Training Teachers: Preparing Pre-Service Elementary Math Specialists Cheryll E. Crowe, Ph.D Department of Mathematics.
September 2006 September 2007 September 2008 September 2009 September 2010 First teaching of 2 tier GCSE Maths (Foundation level C-F, Higher level A*
1.1 TEACHING FOR UNDERSTANDING Mathematical Thinking for Instruction K-2 ©CDMT 2008.
Deepening Teacher Math Content Knowledge MMP Key Components of High Quality Professional Development DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
Challenging Courses and Curricula - Implementing Research
Maths education| changes to 2010
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Implementing the Common Core Standards
Transitioning to Common Core Math
UNDERSTANDING COMMON CORE MATH
Intel® Math.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Teaching by Inquiry How to Teach by Asking Questions
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Mathematics Day 1 Gill Haysham
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Virginia’s Mathematics Specialist Initiative
Information July 15, 2015.
HLPs and EBPs in mathematics and science in clinical experiences
High School to Postsecondary Alignment
Presentation transcript:

MSP SHOWCASE: Intel® Math September 27, 2017 Mathematics Education Specialist: Dr. Robin S. Kalder, kalderr@ccsu.edu Central Connecticut State University Mathematician: Dr. Becky Hall, hallb@wcsu.edu Western Connecticut State University

Course Basics For K-8 school teachers in K-8 mathematics content 80 hour professional development course Emphasis on deepening the conceptual understanding of mathematics through exploration, inquiry activities, solution sharing, and homework 90% mathematics content & 10% mathematics pedagogy

Course Themes Mathematics is problem solving Arithmetic, geometry, & algebra are interconnected There are many ways to solve a problem Mathematics is not a spectator sport!

Intel Math is NOT… Intel Math is… remediation make and take activities only focused on the math a particular teacher teaches deeply conceptual for building the foundational knowledge of teachers about the coherent whole of K-8 mathematics

In the beginning… The Intel Foundation wanted to find a math content PD program that they could get behind Spent a full year doing research on existing PD programs, and was dissatisfied with what they found Vermont Math Initiative (3 yr master’s program) was impressive, but not scalable Intel contracted Dr. Ken Gross to “distill” his Phase 1 and “Greatest Hits” into an 80 hour PD program

From 2010 – 2017 Implemented nationally across 17 states: AZ, CA, CT, FL, GA, IL, MA, MI, MS, NH, NJ, NM, OR, PA, UT, VA, WI 272 cohorts ~7254 teachers reaching 1.7M students

Course Content Unit 1: Problem Solving Unit 2: Addition and Subtraction Unit 3: Multiplication Unit 4: Division Unit 5: Fractions Unit 6: Rational Numbers Unit 7: Linear Relations Unit 8: Functions

Course Pedagogy Content Sessions Pedagogy Sessions Modeling by Instructors Reflecting on Pedagogical Moves

Summer 2017 Session 1: July 10 – July 21 Twenty nine K-8 teachers from Hamden, New Haven and Vernon Constance Leidy, Wesleyan University, Lindsay Keazer, CCSU Session 2: July 24 – August 4 Twenty eight K-8 teachers from Becky Hall WCSU, Robin Kalder, CCSU

Results from Session 2 Pretest Average Posttest Average

Results from Session 2 Rate the impact the Intel Math Summer Institute had on your understanding of math content and concepts by comparing your understanding before your involvement in the Institute with your current understanding. (Scale 1 – 10)  Level of previous math content and concept understanding (5.86)   Level of current math content and concept understanding (8.50)

Participant Comments I understand why the math works for a lot of the content I already knew and was refreshed on math I hadn’t done in years I have been able to hone in on areas of relative weakness in my content I felt pretty confident in my math content ability leading into this, but the institute pushed me to become confident beyond my grade level

Previous level of confidence (6.29) Current level of confidence (8.32) Rate the impact the Intel Math Summer Institute had on your confidence in effectively teaching mathematics at a deeper level by comparing your confidence before your involvement in the Institute to your current confidence level. (Scale 1 – 10) Previous level of confidence  (6.29)  Current level of confidence (8.32)

Participants Comments Understanding the conceptual meanings behind math concepts, thus increasing my confidence I was so unsure of myself. I feel so much more confident. I feel like I can get through some tough problems & it’s so rewarding I think I will be able to better explain to students why the math works and make deeper connections across content

Previous level of confidence (6.50) Current level of confidence (8.86) Rate the potential impact the Intel Math Summer Institute may have on your math instruction by comparing instructional strategies and/or methods you used before your involvement in the Institute with the strategies and/or methods you may adopt as a result of your participation in the Institute. (Scale 1 – 10) Previous level of confidence  (6.50)  Current level of confidence (8.86)

Participants Comments I have so many more ideas & strategies to give my students more of the how and why behind their math concepts I had such a mental block before I feel / I know I can do more I was really lacking in explaining the why to my students. I will certainly add more critical thinking to my math lessons & not just “teach a rule”

What has been the most beneficial aspect of this Institute for you as a professional educator? Opening my eyes to math connections between lower and upper grades To deepen the level of my math instruction – give my students more excitement for math & to think critically Networking with others, really understanding why we do certain things and connecting it all together Reworking problems outside of “comfort base” with colleagues and teachers outside of my discipline Truly gaining an understanding of mathematical learning K-middle school

Being a student again helps you be a better teacher Write one statement that should be shared with future Intel Math Summer Institute participants. Being a student again helps you be a better teacher The how & why behind math procedure is so key to teaching the concepts Try your best, you most likely will have a math breakthrough in the end You will be a better teacher for taking Intel math

Central Connecticut State University For information about a future Intel training please contact: Robin S. Kalder Central Connecticut State University kalderr@ccsu.edu 860-832-2842 Any questions?