Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and Corollary Proceedings: Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation FITZPATRICK,
Advertisements

CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation Foundations of Investigating.
Chapter 7: Evidence and Procedure Evidence: Proves/Disproves fact in issue Procedure: Rules of Court.
Randy J. Cox.  F.R.E. 301 is short and vague, with no definition of “presumption.”  Note F.R.E. 302 provides that state law governs the effect of presumptions.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
Chapter 10 The Hearsay Rule.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Criminal Evidence 7th Edition
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
Confronting the Confrontation Objection: Crawford Update Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill October, 2006 © 2006 Click Here for Sound.
Criminal Law Update & Review NC Conference of Superior Court Judges November, 2004 Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill Click Here For Sound.
Hearsay Exceptions Steven Magnone.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.
Evidence Professor Cioffi 4/05/2011 – 4/27/2011.
Hearsay Exceptions Declarant Unavailable. Unlike FRE 803, FRE 804 provides exceptions where the Declarant Must be Unavailable to testify.
Evidence Professor Cioffi Evidence Professor Cioffi 2/2/2011 – 2/16/
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Courtroom Testimony. Preparation Before Court Review notes and reports beforehand Have a legal knowledge of the case Bring notes with you to court Bring.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
EXCLUSIONS FROM HEARSAY Prior Inconsistent Statement, Prior Consistent Statements, Prior Identifications.
A Federal Defender’s Guide to Confrontation Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
Past Recollection Recorded. Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true.
Unit 6 The Trial: Players, Motions, Hearings, and Pleas Or I am getting my day in court.
Police Reports Admissible or Not?. The MYTH “A police officer’s regular practice in the business of policing is to observe crime and report it. Thus,
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
MEDICAL RECORDS Admissabilty: Hearsay exceptions Authentication Who can sponsor the evidence? What can it be used for? How to get it in? What to do with.
1 Law of Evidence Mark Pollitt Associate Professor.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
CJ 305 Unit 3. Housekeeping  Coming up in Unit 4  DB questions  Seminar  No U4 quiz  No U4 writing assignment.
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Mock Trial Rules of Evidence Arkansas Bar Association Mock Trial Committee Anthony L. McMullen, J.D., Vice Chair ( )
Experts and Lay Witness
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
Law of Evidence Oral Evidence.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
Basic Evidence Foundations
Introduction to Cross Examination, Impeachment, and Hearsay
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
Criminal Evidence Marjie Britz Chapter Ten: Hearsay
Impeachment James Harris Sanaz Ossanloo Law 16 Professor Jordan
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH
AGENDA Brief Lecture on Chapters courtroom evidence and jury selections and juries Film, 12 angry men Written exercise
Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics
State of Oregon v. Willy Freeman
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
OBJECTIONS.
How Witnesses are Examined
Who may impeach a Witness
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Objections How, when, why…...
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
Hearsay Exceptions - Rules 803 and 804
Presentation transcript:

Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017

Hearsay (n) An out of court statement offered in court for the truth of the matter asserted.

Out of court statement… Statements made outside of the present court Examples: crime scene; police interrogation, in a prior court proceeding, in jail, in a private conversation, to a friend, etc. The person who made the statement is called the “DECLARANT” Declarant is not necessarily the person testifying in court (WITNESS) Important to keep track on who the declarant and the witness are

…offered in court… “offered” - it is important to understand why the statement is being offered. What is its purpose? “in court”- this refers to the present court

…for the truth of the matter asserted The truth of the statement itself- not the truth of the matter asserted by the party offering the statement Statements used for other purpose besides truth of matter asserted are not hearsay.

Hearsay applies to verbal statements, non-verbal conduct, and writings.

Although hearsay is inadmissible in court, there are exemptions and exceptions to the hearsay rule The rationale behind these exemptions/exceptions is that they tend to be reliable and trustworthy.

Hearsay Exemptions Are not hearsay at all. These include: *Admission by a party opponent *Prior witness inconsistent statement *Prior witness consistent statement *Prior witness identification

Hearsay Exceptions Are considered hearsay but are excepted due to trustworthiness. These include: *Excited utterances *Present sense impressions *Declarations of present state of mind *Statement made for medical diagnosis/treatment *Recorded recollection

Hearsay Exceptions Exceptions (cont.) *Business records *Public records *Family records *Ancient documents *Dying declarations *Statements against interest *Prior testimony *Forfeiture by wrongdoing

Testimony of Detective Riggs-1 A witness may be impeached by several means including: Bias Inconsistent statement Character Competency Contradiction Impeachment by character (FRE 608(a)) FRE 608 (a) permits impeachment or support of a witness’s character by reputation or opinion evidence. FRE 608(b) allows impeachment by specific instances of conduct on cross examination if they are probative of the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of the witness

Testimony of Detective Riggs-2 Business Records Exception FRE 803(6)??? The record was made at or near the time by someone with knowledge The record was kept in the course of regularly conducted activity of the business Making the record was a regular activity of the business These conditions are shown by a custodian of the record or other qualified witness The opponent does not show evidence of a lack of trustworthiness. Dying Declaration (FRE 804(b)(2)) In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, a statement while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent, made about its cause or circumstances.

Testimony of Detective Riggs-3

Exhibit 3 Deposit slip and cash register receipt Recall that written documents can be considered hearsay if offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Here the business records exception (FRE 803 (6)) to the hearsay rule may apply if: The record was made at or near the time by someone with knowledge The record was kept in the course of regularly conducted activity of the business Making the record was a regular activity of the business These conditions are shown by a custodian of the record or other qualified witness The opponent does not show evidence of a lack of trustworthiness.

Exhibit 4 Check and Check Register

Questions? Thank-you for your indulgence! Hector

Are you Feeling it???