Commodity Classic 2018 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opportunities and Challenges of Marketing FGD - Gypsum to Agriculture David Flack Marketing Director Ag Spectrum Company.
Advertisements

Joseph W. Glauber Chief Economist, USDA USDA 89 th Agricultural Outlook Forum February 21,
Oklahoma Agriculture. 86,600 farms; 4 th in the nation Gender of Operator Male: 87.5% Female: 12.5% Average age of farm operators: 58 Farm Organization.
Agricultural Importance in Arkansas!. Northwest Portion of the State.

Alternative Cropping Systems… Comparison to a Conventional C-Sb Rotation Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management Ann Johanns, Extension.
and how is it necessary for civilization?
1 Informa Economics 2007 Agriculture Policy Roundtable Commodity Market Update By Jim Sullivan Informa Economics 2007 Agriculture Policy Roundtable Commodity.
United States Agriculture AGST 3000 Agriculture, Society and the Natural World.
The Farmer & Farm Segments Chapter 6. The Farmer The avg. age of farm operators in 2002 was 58 Many have accumulated/consolidate d their operations over.
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
ISU Ag. Decision Maker; – Farmland Purchase analysis – Farmland values – Costs of production – Price assumptions – General update information USDA – FSA.
Regional Issues and Program Committee September 30, 2003 Larry D. Jones, Agricultural Economics.
2012 USDA Ag Outlook Forum USDA Outlook for the 2012 U.S. Farm Economy Timothy Park & Kevin Patrick Farm and Rural Business Branch Resource and Rural Economics.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
Remarks by Mark Pearson Independent Community Bankers Nashville, Tennessee March 12, 2012.
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service American Indian Farm and Ranch Data 2012 Census of Agriculture Statistics.
Relative Cost Efficiency of No-Till Farms 2008 Ag Profitability Conference: McPherson Michael Langemeier January 15, 2008.
Farmer Risk Perceptions and Demand for Risk Management Education Keith H. Coble, Mississippi State University Thomas O. Knight, Texas A&M University George.
Conservation Tillage Study Prepared for: The Cotton Foundation December, 2002 Doane Marketing Research St. Louis, Missouri.
Organic Agriculture …… Comparison to the Conventional Agriculture: Still Viable? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
THE SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS FROM THE ADOPTION OF BIOTECH SOYBEAN VARIETIES N. Kalaitzandonakes, J.Alston and J. Kruse Un of Missouri, UC Davis.
Iowa Farmers’ Use of Information Sources and Preferred Ways of Receiving Information J. Gordon Arbuckle Jr. March 27, 2013.
1 Agribusiness Library Lesson Agribusiness in a Free Enterprise System.
1 Direct Farm Fuel Expenses, Results from a Large Farm Survey Robert W. Dubman Survey and Data Coordinator USDA/Economic Research Service.
Lesson L060002: The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness
1 Evaluating & Revising Business Goals. 2 Why do teams or businesses have goals?
“Wisconsin and the Agricultural Economy” (Steve Deller, Professor of Agriculture and Applied Economics. UW-Madison)
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Farmland Purchase Analysis. Resources ISU Ag. Decision Maker; – Farmland Purchase analysis – Farmland values – Costs of production – Price assumptions.
2014 State Farm Management Non- Math Problems. 7. How many pounds are in a metric ton? A. 2,000.0 B. 2,204.6 C. 3,666.7 D. 4,012.5 E. None of the above.
Survey Report Event Survey Report ●Survey Participants469 ●Survey Participation58% ●Total Survey Responses6757 ●Active Attendees814 ●Attendee Networking16744.
Community Survey Report
NC Ag Situation & Outlook 2017: Getting Through the Downturn
Farmer Risk Perceptions and Demand for Risk Management Education
Price outlook for the 21 covered commodities and risk considerations
Contribution of Wheat Production to the Washington Economy
2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs Overview
TRENDS in CALIFORNIA ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs PLC
Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages
Agricultural Industry Profile
The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry
Crop Economics: Continuing Need to Cut Costs
The Agricultural Core Chapter Eleven
LEARN WHAT’S NEW IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE
Higher Education and Latinos in California March 2018
Profits Weather – Profit – Clouds Hills Community Center
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
Obtaining and Using USDA Market and Production Reports
N A S S 2002 ational gricultural tatistics ervice U.S. Department
Who benefits from Biotechnology?
US Farming Market Outlook
Lesson 5: Food and farming
RICE ECONOMICS Farm Program and Economic Outlook
Production and Marketing Contracts in Agriculture
Iowa’s Position in Global Agriculture and Bioenergy
Farm Definition Any place from which $1,000 of agricultural products were produced and sold, or normally would have been sold, during the census.
Crop Market Outlook Integrated Crop Management Conference Ames, Iowa
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
Census of Agriculture 2007 Farms & Farming in Southwest Minnesota
Risk Environment for Agriculture
2013 Agricultural Commodity Outlook
The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry
COUNTRIES REPRESENTED ATTENDEES FULL REGISTRATIONS 66 NUMBER OF EXHIBITORS 16 COUNTRIES REPRESENTED 19 TOTAL ATTENDANCE companies.
The Emerging Role of Agriculture in Economic Development
Agriculture media Planning Guide
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Display Week 2017 Exhibitor Survey Revised
Presentation transcript:

Commodity Classic 2018 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA

Attendance 2018 Commodity classic

Year-to-Year Attendance New Orleans Phoenix San Antonio Kissimmee Nashville Tampa

Year-to-Year Attendance 2010 compared to 2018

First-Time Attendees (Non-Exhibitor) Anaheim Phoenix New Orleans San Antonio Kissimmee Nashville San Antonio

Farmer Profile 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Total Acres 2,850 2,779 2,893 3,009 2,520 2,332 2,401 Corn Acres 1,169 1,137 1,197 1,247 1,117 1,112 1,098 Soybean Acres 1,124 1,020 1,122 862 870 859 Wheat Acres 910 861 992 897 686 844 Sorghum Acres 474 445 471 467 582 419 670 Cotton Acres 872 1,023 988 NA Avg. Age 50.2 50.1 52.6 53.4 51.7 52.9 52.8 Based on registered farmers completing demographic information

Farmer Profile - Continued 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 No. Feedlot Cattle 550 314 604 NA Cow/Calf Pairs 240 177 150 Avg. Cattle 481 414 446 401 Avg. Hogs 7,500 7,956 7,994 7,363 6,511 7,280 8,642 Hay/Forage Acres 485 432 Peanut 893 646 Based on registered farmers completing demographic information

Other Attendee Groups 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Media 152 162 186 148 160 138 156 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Youth (15-22) 165 198 291 188 263 414 270 Child (14 & under) 340 136 NA 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 College Students 116 50 NA Based on registration categories

Farmer Map CANADA 46 states & the District of Columbia represented MB 33 | ON 177 | NS 4 QC 22 | SK 7 4 20 15 138 CT 8 DC 9 DE 23 MA 16 MD 46 NJ 12 VT 1 279 16 34 90 34 156 101 10 54 383 281 191 298 152 2 2 15 42 35 180 163 105 41 80 66 32 28 40 5 15 29 46 states & the District of Columbia represented 17 17 Nicaragua 1 Japan 1 17 78 17

Trade Show 2018 Commodity classic

Trade Show Profile

Number of Companies by Products and Services Total Companies = 367

Net Square Feet by Exhibitor Category Total Net Square Feet = 189,400

Onsite Survey 2018 Commodity classic

Main Reasons for Attending * ‘other farmers’ was changed from ‘other growers’ in 2018 ** ‘row crops’ was changed from ‘crop industries’ in 2017 Q1. What was the main reason you decided to attend Commodity Classic? Q2. What was the second main reason you decided to attend Commodity Classic? Q3 What was the third main reason you decided to attend Commodity Classic?

Education Most Interested In Q4. What was the main type of education you are most interested in getting at the Commodity Classic? Q5. What was the second type of education you are most interested in getting at the Commodity Classic? Q6. What was the third type of education you are most interested in getting at the Commodity Classic?

Registration Fee Q7. Were the following Commodity Classic expenses paid for by you (or your farm/business) or paid for in part or in full by someone else such as a supplier or your state association?

Attending If Fees Had Not Been Paid For Q8. Would you have attended if your [EXPENSE] had not been paid for?

Direct Others in Making Purchase Input Decisions Q10. Do you direct others in making purchasing input decisions for your farm?

Role in Operation Q9. Which of the following statements best describes your role on the operation?

Likelihood to Make Decision Based on C.C. Information (Farmers Only) Q11. For each of the following topics, how likely are you to make production decisions based on information you receive at Commodity Classic?

Farming Phase Demographic Percent of 2018 Respondents (n=398) D2. Which of the following best describes your role in the farming operation?

Percent of 2018 Respondents (n=464) Level of Education Level of Education Percent of 2018 Respondents (n=464) D3. Which of the following best describes your level of education?

Age of Respondents Mean Age Median Age 50 53 Percent of 2018 Respondents (n=464) D4. What year were you born?

New Commodity Classic Attendees No 64% Percent of 2018 Respondents (n=464) QS1. Is this your first Commodity Classic?

Attendees Who Consider Themselves Early Adopters D8. Would you say you are one of the first to adopt new products and practices on your operation when they become available in your area?

Number of Farmers Influenced Mean Median 13 5 D9. How many farmers in your area would you say often ask your opinion on new agricultural products and practices?

Post-Event Survey 2018 Commodity classic

Convention Registration Process *Added in 2017 Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Monday Opening Welcome Reception Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

General Session *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % **Survey moved from paper to on-line format Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Evening of Entertainment *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % **Survey moved from paper to on-line format Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Commodity Classic Mobile App *Added in 2015 Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Main Stage Education *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % **Survey moved from paper to on-line format Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Overall Educational Value *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Overall Trade Show *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Location *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Likelihood of Recommending Commodity Classic to a Friend Mean 8.6 8.4 *Added in 2014 Q10. How likely are you to recommend attending the Commodity Classic to a friend?

Top Three Reasons for Attending * ‘Opportunity to meet with farmers from around the country’ added in 2018 * ‘Opportunity to meet with company representatives’ added in 2018 **Meetings changes from Programs in 2017 Q6. Please Rank the Top 3 Reasons for Attending:

Overall Commodity Classic *Starting in 2015, no longer including those who say ‘no comment’ in total % Q4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Acres & Dollars Impact 2018 COMMODITY CLASSIC

Methodology Commodity Classic Registration Commodity Classic Surveys USDA NASS January 2018 USDA WASDE March 2018 USDA ERS December 2017

High Impact 7,085,579 total acres in attendance Corn: 2,252,663 Soybeans: 2,165,948 Wheat: 1,753,570 Sorghum: 913,398 Per Farm Avg. Gross Farm Income: $1,508,415 Avg. Equipment Purchases: $347,622 Avg. Seed & Chem. Purchases: $297,092 Avg. Fertilizer Purchases: $214,774

High Impact 7,085,579 total acres in attendance Corn: 2,252,663 Soybeans: 2,165,948 Wheat: 1,753,570 Sorghum: 913,398 Total Gross Farm Income: $2,906,716,033 Equipment Purchases: $669,866,746 Seed & Chem. Purchases: $572,496,496 Fertilizer Purchases: $413,869,151

Impact Beyond the Event

High Impact (Factor 5) 35,427,895 total acres impacted (15%) Corn: 11,263,315 Soybeans: 10,829,740 Wheat: 8,767,850 Sorghum: 4,566,990 Total Gross Farm Income: $14,533,580,163 Equipment Purchases: $3,349,333,731 Seed & Chem. Purchases: $2,862,482,480 Fertilizer Purchases: $2,069,345,756

High Impact (Factor 13) 85,549,760 total acres impacted (37%) Corn: 28,879,140 Soybeans: 27,767,453 Wheat: 22,480,767 Sorghum: 6,422,400 Total Gross Farm Income: $36,063,260,235 Equipment Purchases: $8,140,909,566 Seed & Chem. Purchases: $7,136,846,226 Fertilizer Purchases: $5,112,549,423

Questions?