David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen Rosberg

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Advertisements

Objective: ●harmonized data sets on snow cover extent (SE), snow water equivalent (SWE), soil freeze and vegetation status from satellite information,
GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) LAND COVER MAP OF.
Development of Bias-Corrected Precipitation Database and Climatology for the Arctic Regions Daqing Yang, Principal Investigator Douglas L. Kane, Co-Investigator.
Land Cover Mapping of Iceland and Southern Greenland Global Land Cover 2000 S. Bartalev (JRC EC), V. Egorov (IKI RAN) and E. Bartholomé (JRC EC)
7.2 Describing Climates.
Freshwater Initiative 1 st All-Hands meeting, Boulder, February
Map of the Arctic (1595) by Mercator W.P 1.4: Land cover and Fire and their representation in models. Objective 1: To amalgamate high latitude land cover.
GISP 2003 / Khon Keaen, Thailand1 Summary and Follow on of GAME- Siberia Activity Takeshi OHTA Nagoya University, JAPAN FORSGC, JAPAN.
Larry D. Hinzman University of Alaska Fairbanks Amanda Lynch University of Colorado Kenji Yoshikawa University of Alaska Fairbanks William Gutowski Iowa.
Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
Vegetation Continuous Fields and the new Land Water Mask Mark Carroll John Townshend Rob Sohlberg Charlene DiMiceli Department of Geography University.
HYPE model simulations for non- stationary conditions in European medium sized catchments Göran Lindström & Chantal Donnelly, SMHI, Sweden IAHS, ,
JULES: Joint UK Land Environment Simulator A community land surface scheme.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Printed by Introduction: The nature of surface-atmosphere interactions are affected by the land surface conditions. Lakes (open water.
Introduction to CMUG assessments, SST and plans for phase 2 Roger Saunders 4 th Integration Meeting.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
NASA Snow and Ice Products NASA Remote Sensing Training Geo Latin America and Caribbean Water Cycle capacity Building Workshop Colombia, November 28-December.
S. Munier, A. Polebitski, C. Brown, G. Belaud, D.P. Lettenmaier.
Key Considerations in Linking Permafrost, Ecosystems and Run-off William J. Gutowski, Jr. Dept. of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University.
Assessment of CCI Glacier and CCI Land cover data for hydrological modeling of the Arctic ocean drainage basin David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen.
ESA CCI-LC | Slide 1 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use.
MSRD FA Continuous overlapping period: Comparison spatial extention: Northern Emisphere 2. METHODS GLOBAL SNOW COVER: COMPARISON OF MODELING.
Arctic terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE satellite estimates and a land surface hydrology model Fengge Su a Douglas E. Alsdorf b, C.K. Shum.
2600 High Latitude Issues Data Editing AlgorithmInterestApplicability E1E2ENTPJ1J2G1C2 MSS based editingImproved data editingXXXxxxxx Fine tuned.
The Role of Spatial and Temporal Variability of Pan-Arctic River Discharge and Surface Hydrologic Processes on Climate Dennis P. Lettenmaier Jennifer C.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Recent SeaWiFS view of the forest fires over Alaska Gene Feldman, NASA GSFC, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, Office for Global Carbon Studies
Hydrological Simulations for the pan- Arctic Drainage System Fengge Su 1, Jennifer C. Adam 1, Laura C. Bowling 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
David Lawrence1 and Andrew Slater2
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model ---
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Earth’s Water Distribution
Fresh Water Sustainable Use.
IGOS Cryosphere Theme The cryosphere is an integral part of the global climate system, modulating surface energy and moisture fluxes, clouds, precipitation,
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Unit 1: Water Systems on Earth Chapter 1
Radiation Balance and Feedbacks
Nick Rayner (Met Office Hadley Centre)
Olga Semenova1,2, Lyudmila Lebedeva3,4, Anatoly Zhirkevich5
Looking for universality...
Impact of Climate Change on Peri-Glacial Environments
An Introduction to VegDRI
Model-Based Estimation of River Flows
Streamflow Simulations of the Terrestrial Arctic Regime
Canada's Natural Vegetation
Jeff Key*, Aaron Letterly+, Yinghui Liu+
Effects of Climate Change
Felix Bunzel and Dirk Notz
The Role of Spatial and Temporal Variability of Pan-Arctic River Discharge and Surface Hydrologic Processes on Climate Dennis P. Lettenmaier Jennifer C.
Unit 1: Water Systems on Earth
The Arctic Region A Brief Overview
WP4.1 : Exploiting CCI products in CMIP like experiments
Model-Based Estimation of River Flows
CMUG Assessments of CCI CDRs
EARTH’S WATERS: 1.2: Fresh Water Flows and Freezes on Earth
EC Workshop on European Water Scenarios Brussels 30 June 2003
biome – a region where plants, animals, and environment are suited to one another
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Change in fresh water inflow from glaciers and rivers
GCW Website Snow Material
WP3.10 : Cross-assessment of CCI-ECVs over the Mediterranean domain
Sources of Fresh Water 10.3.
LUCAS long term perspective
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Presentation transcript:

David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen Rosberg Inputs to ESA CCI Sixth Integration meeting WP3.9 Assessment of glacier, land cover and (sea level) data for hydrological modeling of the Arctic ocean drainage basin David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen Rosberg SMHI 10 March 2016

Objectives Assess the use of ESA CCI Glacier, Land cover (and Sea level) in hydrological modelling for the Arctic: Compare CCI data with existing datasets: long term trends and seasonal variations? Can use of CCI Glacier and Land cover improve simulated river runoff to the Arctic Ocean? Is there a relation between changes in observed land cover and the simulated river runoff?

Progress since May 2015 Arctic-HYPE Pan-Arctic hydrological model updated using CCI land Cover v1.4 and CCI Glacier (RGI v4.0) – (version available in May 2015) Additional information added after recommendation from CCI teams: Glacier volumes adapted to regional estimates published by Huss&Farinotti (2012) – still CCI glacier does not provide consistent information on the temporal development of glacier area and volume which is needed to initialize and evaluate glacier hydrological models in a climate change perspective! Re-calibration is still on-going and comparison with previous model versions with regard to improved understanding of the arctic hydrology is still in progress. Main improvements so far: Much improved representation of glacierized area and volume compared to previous model versions Improved representation of surface water areas – however, we believe the total surface water area is still underestimated in v1.4 (see next slides)

Plans until June 2016 Evaluate impact of Arctic-HYPE model updated with CCI data (land cover and glacier) with regard to longterm simulation of key water storages and fluxes in pan-arctic region Evaluate if temporal changes in land cover in CCI data (mainly decideous needle leef forest in Siberia) is also reflected in the hydrology (biases between model and observations) Evaluate the impact of increase amount and details in surface water area in Land cover v1.6 vs v1.4

January 2016 - New release of data from ESA CCI 3 new global LC maps version 1.6.1 with improved representation of lichen and mosses, deforestation patterns in Republic Democratic of Congo and water bodies; 1 new global static map of open water bodies version 4.0 at 150 m spatial resolution; Data is available here: http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php This data was downloaded 20160307 Land Cover Maps - v1.6.1 2008-2012 epoch - v1.6.1 (tif, 7z) - 2.8Go (previous used v1.3) 2003-2007 epoch - v1.6.1 (tif, 7z) - 2.8Go (previous used v1.4) 1998-2002 epoch - v1.6.1 (tif, 7z) - 1.7Go (previous used v1.4) 3-epoch series of global land cover maps at 300m spatial resolution, where each epoch covers a 5-year period (2008-2012, 2003-2007, 1998-2002). Water Bodies - v4.0 Water Bodies v4.0 (tif) - 296Mo Static map of open water bodies at 150 m spatial resolution resulting from a compilation and editions of land/water classifications: the Envisat ASAR water bodies indicator, a sub-dataset from the Global Forest Change 2000 - 2012 and the Global Inland Water product. This product is delivered at 150 m as a stand-alone product but it forms class "Water Bodies" of the LC Maps v1.6.1 after resampling to 300 m using an average algorithm. The product consists of 1 classification layer with legend : 1-Land, 2-Water

No changes – our comments remains Conclusions from Progress meeting, SMHI 26-28/5 2015 CCI Land cover v1.3-1.4 (2000, 2005, 2010) Improved snow and ice area (comp to Globcover) Increased water surface area Interesting trends in Arctic forest vegetation Current limitations: Static Surface water and Glacier information Conclusions from v1.6 evaluation 8/3 2016 CCI Land cover v 1.6 The CCI glaciers (RGI glaciers) are still not inserted to the Land cover with correct resolution. Water surface area has improved and for Arctic-HYPE domain it increases. Still trends (2000-2010) in Arctic forest vegetation (larch) Changes in several other classes both globally and in particular for Arctic-HYPE domain: lichens and mosses, needle leaved forest, different types of shrublands/sparse vegetation/bare land Current limitations Still static water and glacier information It would be a large advantage if the waterbodies could be separated into rivers (at least for the largest rivers) and lakes and perhaps also ocean. Conclusions from Progress meeting at SMHI 26-28/5 2015 CCI Glacier very useful for hydrological modelling: setup and evaluation of glacier area and volume Very high resolution and level of detail Global coverage Current limitations: Time series missing in RGI dataset needed for initialization, calibration, evaluation of long term modelling Users may compile information from other data sets: GLIMS/WGMS/litterture/etc. No changes – our comments remains

Glaciers in ESA CCI Landcover 2010 version1.6 The CCI glaciers (RGI v 4.0) are still not inserted to the Land cover with correct resolution. ESA CCI Landuse v 1.6 still gives (like v 1.4) ~30% larger area than CCI glacier (RGI v 4.0) Part of glacier in Alaska Glaciers in ESA CCI Landcover 2010 version1.6 Glaciers in RGI v 4.0 Results: The RGI glaciers should be represented better. => The land cover class ”Permanent Snow and ice” could perhaps be separated into two classes: Glaciers and Permanent snow (or similar).

V 1.4 V 1.6 The landuse class Waterbodies has improved resolution The waterbodies are now based on the new stand alone product for waterbodies (ESACCI-LC-L4-WB-Map-150m-P13Y-2000-v4.0.tif) which is prepared with a resolution of 150m instead of 300 m. In the ESA CCI LU v1.6 it is resampled to 300m but still show an improved picture of the waterbodies in two ways: A. Rivers and smaller lakes which did not exist before appears => increased area B. Very broad rivers increase their resolution => decrease in area Results: The total amount of waterbodies over the world remains the same. For Arctic-HYPE domain it would be an increase from 1.10 million km2 to 1.38 million km2 . => decrease in several other classes We think this is an improvement! V 1.4 V 1.6

Northern Canada Northern Russia V1.4 V1.6 Increased amount of lichens and mosses Northern Canada Northern Russia V1.4 V1.6 Results: Lichens and mosses is a landcover class which has increased a lot for the Arctic domain with version 1.6 => several other classes like sparse vegetation, bare areas, shrubland and also evergreen tree cover has therefore decreased. => We think this is an improvement and that we probably should separate land cover classes bare land and open land in the Arctic-HYPE model into three and use this information better .

Largest changes for Arctic domain using v 1.6 instead of v 1.4 1% = 235 000 km2