Post Installation Inspection & RCP Evaluation Tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
BUSINESS DEVELPOMENT TEAM DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC MPS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Trust but Verify “Post Installation Inspection (PII) of Storm Pipe”
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Post Installation Inspection Demonstration
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Post Installation Inspection & RCP Evaluation Tools

Goal Share our Experiences from other States Requiring Similar PII Tools and Techniques Provide Knowledge and Tools to obtain Correct Evaluation of Installed RCP www.concrete-pipe.org

WA OR ID MT WY UT CO NV CA AZ NM ND SD MN IA WI TX OK KS NE MO IL KY MI AR MS AL GA PA LA FL SC VA WV NY ME RI DE MD NC OH IN TN VT NH MA NJ CT AK Will post installation inspection become more prevalent? States shown in solid yellow have mandatory deflection inspection requirements. States shown in dashed blue, require or allow the use of laser profiling technology for post-installation inspection. About 30 State DOT’s require some type of Post Installation Inspection Storm Drainage 22 – States (Yellow) Require Mandrel Inspections – some considering CCTV + Laser Profiling + Micrometers 12 – States (Hashed) currently require or allow CCTV + Laser Profiling + Measurements of defects

Experiences From Other DOT’s/Munis. Stringent PII Inspection Specs. On Street Fire-Drills 1st Fire Drill = 1st Bid Letting 2nd Fire Drill = 1st PII Reports completed Fire-Drill Aversion leads to Training and knowledge gathering Calming effect - Once all stake-holders up to speed Slide 4

Prepare, Train, and Educate Prepare DOT/Muni. Inspection & Evaluation Team NASSCO PACP Subcontractors Educate Installers Prepare All Stakeholders on PII Eval. Process (who what when where?) Standard PII Report Format Slide 5

Inspection Team Preparation Trained on Proper Use of Inspection Equipment Proper Inspection Techniques & Issue Coding NASSCO PACP Certification Know Limitations Provide thorough, clear, quantifiable information

Evaluation Team DOT/Muni Specs. & AASHTO Guidelines Differentiate Between Cosmetic = Non-ISSUES Minor Damage = Note but No Repair Structural Issue = Evaluate Severity and determine if acceptable or what remedy required www.concrete-pipe.org

Tools for Evaluation “Post Installation Evaluation and Repair of Installed Reinforced Concrete Pipe” See Your Handout! www.concrete-pipe.org

Post Installation Evaluation and Repair of Installed Reinforced Concrete Pipe Contents Background on RCP Loads, Design, Structural Confirmation, & Joint Performance Decision Matrix Crack Eval. & Repair Joint Eval. & Repair Spalling and Slabbing Eval. & Repair References & Supporting Documents www.concrete-pipe.org

Crack Evaluation Matrix Consistent with AASHTO Guidelines Acceptance Vs Repair Must know location, orientation, & crack width www.concrete-pipe.org

Crack measurement Accuracy Crack measurement Accuracy? Can you expect accurate measurements of cracks less than 0.05” in width? (Width of U.S. Dime = 0.05”) Slide 11

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specification Section 27.6.4 (Summary) Crack < to 0.01” These cracks are minor & OK Crack between 0.01” and 0.10” Evaluation required: is it detrimental and in a corrosive environment? (PH<5.5) If non-corrosive or not detrimental – OK If corrosive and detrimental – Seal crack Crack > 0.10” Evaluation required: is crack detrimental to structure? If not detrimental – OK If detrimental – repair and seal crack If not repairable – remediate or replace Slide 12

Crack Matrix Allows user to quickly evaluate crack severity and determine if crack is detrimental or acceptable without repair. Follows AASHTO Guidance Be Prepared to see some cracking. Crack < 0.10” (width of two Dimes) = Generally Acceptable www.concrete-pipe.org

Joint Eval. Matrix www.concrete-pipe.org

Joint Matrix Performance Expectation? Leak Resistant, Silt Tight, Soil Tight Joint Opening meet Manufacturers recommendations Infiltration of soil? www.concrete-pipe.org

Joint Evaluation Accurate measurements Signs of infiltration Signs of soil migration www.concrete-pipe.org

Joints Note any leaking joints Evidence of soil migration through joint requires evaluation Differential movement, cracks, spalls, improper gasket placement, movement or settlement to be noted Slide 17

Slabbing / Spalling Evaluation Matrix www.concrete-pipe.org

Spalling/Slabbing Spalling crack face edges chipping at joint No steel exposed = No Problem Steel exposed needs repair Slabbing – typically caused by Radial Tension Shear Cracks 30 deg off invert Slabs of concrete can become dislodged Slabbing is repairable www.concrete-pipe.org

Conclusion – Avoid Fire Drills Prepare DOT/Muni. Inspection & Evaluation Team Obtain Clear and good Inspection Data Develop Standard PII Report Format Clear Evaluation Protocol – Utilize ACPA PII Eval. Manual Educate Installers Communicate PII Eval. Process to all Stakeholders www.concrete-pipe.org