Robert Jones Mariah Wardius Kimberly Hein Matt Creazzo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: The Pros Sukhjit, Dawinder, Bandeep, Jasmin, Prabhjot.
Advertisements

Canadian Tar Sands By: Chris Wolfe
Alberta’s Oil Sands CGC1P. The Oil Sands AKA Tar Sands Large deposits of bitumen (extremely heavy crude oil) –A mix of crude bitumen (semi-solid oil),
Alberta Tar Sands Is it good for Canada?. Alberta Oil Sands Area.
Water Pollution Thirsty?.
Tar Sands & Keystone XL Ryan Salmon Coordinator for Climate and Energy Policy National Wildlife Federation.
Just the Fracks Ma’am: Fracking, Oil Sands, Energy….. & You [For web viewers: right click on the screen; you should get a menu box with the option “Edit.
American Petroleum Institute Energy Community in Depth December 3, 2014.
Mining and other extraction methods Topic 17. Important Terms  Mineral  Ore  Reserve  Surface mining  Subsurface mining.
Water Facts Kasey and Rosalie. The United States uses about 346,000 million gallons of water per day.
Lesson 3 Non- Renewable Natural Resources
THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE BY: ZACH HASOULAS. WHAT IS THE PIPELINE? The Keystone XL Pipeline is a proposed extension of the original Keystone Pipeline System.
Non-Renewable - COAL Pros: Abundant supply Inexpensive High power yield Infrastructure already exists Can be changed to liquid or gas Cons: Nonrenewable.
Tar Sands: A Future Energy?. Definition of Tar Sands In a nutshell: gravels or sands that are saturated with very heavy crude oil. Think of a very soggy,
Groundwater Resources: The Desert Southwest. What has happened to groundwater levels in the area investigated as time has progressed? What were the reasons.
The Keystone XL Pipeline will have a negative impact on the environment if the proposal to build it passes. By Darrel Bagiotti.
Energy Resources.
Canadian Oil Sands: Opportunities and Challenges November 3, 2010.
Oil Sands – Saviour or Scourge? Dirty Oil? Ethical Oil? The industry’s best alternative? William Schoenhardt, King City SS
NONRENWEABLE RESOURCES By Maria Salmeron. Table Of Contents A1. Title page A2. Table of contents 1. What is it used for? coal/petroleum 2.What is the.
ENERGY: SUPPLY AND DEMAND Dr. Ron Lembke. US Energy “Sankey” Diagram.
NONRENEWABLE RESOURCE DEPLETION. HOW ARE NONRENEWABLE RESOURCES OBTAINED?
The Keystone XL Pipeline Paridhi R.. Outline Background Information What is it? Crude Oil Construction Stakeholders The Big Issue.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
Kalina Scherbel December 4, 2003 North American Tar Baby: Draining the Alberta Oil Sands.
Alberta Tar Sands Cameron Flynn. What Is a tar sand? A tar sand is an area that has large amounts of oil under a sandy area, each grain is surrounded.
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
The Keystone Pipeline is a pipeline system to transport synthetic crude oil and diluted bitumen ("dilbit") from the Athabasca Oil Sands in northeastern.
Petroleum and Tars Sands By Cameron Aenlle-Rocha & Chris Parker.
Keystone XL. Overview Originally proposed in 2008 Originally proposed in 2008 Transport oil from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf of Mexico Transport oil from.
ILLINOIS - RAILTEC Slide 1 © 2013 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. All Rights Reserved Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation Risk Analysis Safety.
Water Pollution Thirsty?.
GEOGRAPHY 12 Environmental Project 2010 Athabasca Tar Sands In 2006 the oil sands produced million barrels per day, 62% of Alberta's total oil production,
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
Water Pollution Thirsty?.
HW #1: 7) Ch2, P#30: A 100-W light bulb is accidentally left on for two days in a basement. If electricity costs 12¢/kWh, how much did this oversight cost?
Non-conventional reserves (excluding gas and coal) Produced (gone) Proved Reserves Undiscovered(?) EOR Extra Heavy Oil & Tar Sands Shale Oil
Seismic Reflection. Saudi Arabian petroleum resources.
Environmental Activist Keystone XL Pipeline should be declined ! Keep a lock on the tars sands and help open the door to more investments in renewable.
Fossil Fuels.
Conventional Oil Advantages Disadvantages High net energy yield Easily transported within and between countries Low land use Technology is well developed.
MONTANA COHN, BRENT DEBAUCH, JASON BENAM Keystone XL Pipeline and Indigenous People.
THE OILSANDS IN ALBERTA: THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES.
Fossil Fuels ch. 19 Oil, Coal, Natural gas How long are each expected to last Location of major reservoirs Major pros and cons of each type What are the.
Global Geography 12 “The apex of disaster capitalism” – Naomi Klein.
Groundwater Students can view the online module about groundwater at: . There is one called “understanding the Hydrological.
By Jack O’Hea Athabasca Tar Sands.
Fossil Fuels.
Dirty Oil & Shovel-Ready Jobs
Water Pollution Thirsty?.
Homework due Monday Nov 7
Net Energy Net energy = Higher ratio means greater net energy
Energy: Supply and demand
Water Pollution.
STANDING ROCK- DAPL protest still going on now
Dakota Pipeline By: Parth and Shivam.
Day 2: Natural Gas and Oil
Fossil Fuels, Their Impacts, and Energy Conservation
Central Case Study: Alberta’s Oil Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline
Oil Spills.
Petroleum and Natural gas
Oil Ananvir Puar.
Energy: Powering Our Nation
Water Pollution Thirsty?.
Human-Environment: Pipelines
Energy: Supply and demand
The Risk of Offshore Drilling for Oil and Gas
Non-Renewable Resources
The Start of Environmental Activism
Presentation transcript:

Robert Jones Mariah Wardius Kimberly Hein Matt Creazzo Keystone XL Pipeline Robert Jones Mariah Wardius Kimberly Hein Matt Creazzo

Introductions What is the keystone pipeline? Runs from Alberta Canada to various US states Requires a 7 billion dollar US investment 830,00 additional barrels of oil per day Why is it controversial? Pipelines can burst and spill Runs directly over large and crucial aquifers Requires a large amount of US investment Very low EROI (Energy return on investment)

For the pipeline! Could reduce gas prices at the pump Could create new jobs According to Jack Gerard, president of the American Petrolium Institute, It would create half a million jobs by 2035 Pipeline proponents state that arguing over the energy cost of extracting these tar sands is a moot point, if we don’t do it someone else will anyway. This pipeline will take greater precautions than any other pipeline built before it, including computer monitoring systems that detect small leaks Source: http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/viewFile/795/600

Against the pipeline! Those opposing the pipeline argue that it will not reduce gas prices, and will instead raise them By building this pipeline, we are becoming more dependant on foreign oil Pipeline opposition argues that this pipeline would not create a significant amount of jobs Tar sands are considered “dirty oil” they require much more energy intensive extraction methods and are very polluting Passes over a massive and crucial midwest aquifer (seen in next slide) Source: http://epubs.utah.edu/index.php/jlrel/article/viewFile/795/600

Somebody call Aquaman That aquifers in danger! But think of the money!

So why are we so worried? This graph shows us an increase in the number of oil spills reported, but a reduction in the amount of millions of gallons spilled. This means we are getting better at spill response Source: http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/docs/oil/fss/fss04/etkin_04.pdf

So why are we so worried? Spills should technically never happen, but humans are not perfect. The problem is we make mistakes ~ Dr. Kenneth Klemow 2014 Earthquakes, Hurricanes, and other disasters do occur The keystone pipeline is 36 inches in diameter (this is important in the next slide)

Kalamazoo! In 2010, the 30 inch diameter pipe broke near the city of Marshall, Michigan Spilled over one million gallons of crude oil into the kalamazoo river The XL pipeline is 36 inches in diameter (6 inches larger) This river contained wildlife (which the ogallala aquifer would not)

Kalamazoo 2: Electric boogaloo An analysis of the drinking water from the kalamazoo river spill showed no long term health effects to humans Slightly increased amounts of nickel and iron were all the remained in human drinking water Not enough of these materials to be harmful The spill cleanup methods cost 765 million dollars

Energy intensity and you 20 kwatts returned 1 Kwatt used So = EROEI of 20 EROEI is energy returned on energy invested which means how much do we get back for what we put in. Tar sands have an EROEI of about 5.25 , tar sand buried even deeper than usual have an EROEI of about 2.5 Sources: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513003856 http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130219/oil-sands-mining-tar-sands-alberta-canada-energy-return-on-investment-eroi-natural-gas-in-situ-dilbit-bitumen

Which side is right? Both sides seem to be using opposite sides of the same arguments in their advantage This leads us to confusion as to which side is correct The information is difficult to analyze, and none of us can perfectly predict the future Ultimately it is up to you to choose which side you stand for, and why Me

Pipeline denied by senate The senate recently voted against the pipeline with 59 in favor and 41 opposed, this ratio was not enough to pass the bill Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/us/politics/keystone-xl-pipeline.html?_r=0

Bibiliography http://emmerson.csc.wilkes.edu:2138/science/article/pii/S030142151300253X http://emmerson.csc.wilkes.edu:2138/science/article/pii/S0301421513007775 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151300253X http://www.texasenterprise.utexas.edu/article/how-and-why-republicans-killed-keystone-pipeline#sthash.5BXrVXUC.dpuf http://geol105naturalhazards.voices.wooster.edu/tar-sands-oil-2/

Questions?