Lesson III Normative Ethics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Morality: constitutive of or overcoming self-interest?
Advertisements

Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Ethical Theory.
ARISTOTLE: Background
Aristotle Virtue Ethics
What do you think? As all ethics is relative and/or, we can never agree on any objectively valid principles Strongly Disagree.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
Aristotle How Should We Live?. Summary of What Will Come  The selection (Nicomachean Ethics, Bks. I and II) begins with Aristotle describing ethics as.
Tele-transport experiment Free from pain and anxiety Free from pain and anxiety.
What is the right thing to do?
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
ETHICS = MORAL PHILOSOPHY Ethics = inquiry into the nature of morality, codes and principles of moral action. Morality = actual practice of living according.
An introduction to Ethics. Important Vocabulary/Concepts Philosophy Ethics Motive Act Consequence Culpable Consequentialism Utilitarianism The Principle.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
Normative Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Chapter 3: How Can I Know What is Right?
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
The Study of Ethics How do we know how to do the Right Thing?
Aristotle ( BCE) Virtue Ethics An act is good if and only if it says good things about one’s character Usually weighed by “moderation” of virtue.
Chapter 2: Readings in Moral Theory Jeremy Bentham, “The Principle of Utility” – Consequentialism: the rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely.
Aristotle on Human Excellence A virtue (arete, excellence) is a character trait, acquired by practice, that disposes a person to adopt the right course.
Virtue Ethics: The goal of life is well-being (happiness) and the means to attain it is by acquiring a virtuous character.
What is the right thing to do?
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Morality and Ethics.
Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Ethical approaches to the harm reduction debate: “Virtue ethics as an alternative to deontological and consequential reasoning in the harm reduction debate”
Obligation: Contemplating the Good, the Right, and the Ought
Immanuel Kant.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Recap on Ethical Theory
“DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Theory of Health Care Ethics
Aristotle on eudaimonia and philosophy
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Ethics – Util Recap What is the principle of utility?
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Something to think about…
20th century conflict day one
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Critique of Practical Reason [Kritik der reinen Vernunft]
Ethics – Util Recap What is the principle of utility?
Introduction to Ethical Reasoning
Kantian Ethics.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Ethical concepts and ethical theories Topic 3
Utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

Lesson III Normative Ethics Ethical theories

Classes of ethical theories Consequentialist ethics focus on the consequences of our actions, which actions are good is relative to the ends and results of those actions. Deontological ethics focus on the moral significance of each action or type of action, some actions are good for themselves and ought to be considered our duty.

Ethical Theories Consequentialist: Deontological: Virtue ethics (eudemonism) - Aristotle Hedonism - Epicurus Emotivism – David Hume Utilitarianism – Jeremy Bentham & John Stuart Mill Deontological: Natural Rights theories – John Locke Ethics of duty – Immanuel Kant Contractarianism – Jürgen Habermas & John Rawls

Virtue Ethics I - Aristotle Happiness The highest good can only be defined by being final, that is for being something desired for its own sake and not as a medium for a further end. Humans universally seek happiness, hence happiness is the highest good since it is the only ultimate goal. But people have very different opinions concerning what happiness is (mainly pleasure, wealth and honor), how are we to understand it? Aristotle understands happiness as “eudaimonia” (good-spirit), that is “flourishing” or “self-realization”. True happiness then: Is enduring (the whole life, not instants, is to be considered happy) Is and end in itself (when reached, nothing else is pursued) Is self-sufficient (the possibility of achieving it relies on me). Happiness must then rely on human nature, and consist on the excellent or full realization of human’s proper function, that is reason.

Virtue Ethics II - Aristotle “Areté” (“excellence”, “virtue”) is the way of achieving happiness, since it is a disposition of our character, which may then last long and depends on us. The happy violinist would be the virtuous one, the one who plays violin with excellence. The happy human would be the virtuous one, the one who uses reason with excellence. Uses it for what? For making the best choices. Practical knowledge, wisdom applied to voluntary actions leads to happiness. Prudence Prudence is the main virtue, it is the virtue of virtues since it consists on the ability, the disposition to recognize the best action, that is, the mean between two extremes, two vices. The prudent man, the wise, will achieve happiness because his character leads him to perform virtuous actions, to make apt choices, he has the habit of acting on the best reason.

Hedonism - Epicurus Epicurus believed that pleasure is the greatest good (hedonism). But the way to attain pleasure is to live modestly and to gain knowledge of the workings of the world and the limits of one's desires (distinguishing natural and necessary pleasures from those non natural nor necessary). Happiness in its highest form is constituted by a state of tranquility (ataraxia) and freedom from fear, as well as absence of bodily pain (aponia). The tetrapharmakos (“fourth-part-cure”) is the recipe leading to happiness: Don’t fear God Don’t worry about death What is good is easy to get What is terrible is easy to endure

Utilitarianism – John Stuart Mill According to utilitarianism the moral worth of an action is determined only by its resulting outcome. Right actions lead to maximize overall happiness: “it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong”. Nonetheless some kinds of pleasure (those of the intellect) are more valuable than others (those of the body), because they last longer and are safer: “It is better to be a Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. And if the pig is of a different opinion, it is because it only knows its own side of the question.”

Immanuel Kant - Ethics of duty I Good will: A good will is the only intrinsically good thing, an action is only good if performed out of duty rather than out of practical need or desire. The good will is a will that acts from duty as a “good-in-itself.” The class of actions in accordance with duty (heteronomy) must be distinguished from the class of actions performed from duty (autonomy).

Immanuel Kant - Ethics of duty II Duty is the necessity of acting out of respect for universal law. Duty is then expressed with a categorical imperative (these imperatives command unconditionally, “You ought to do X” ) not with an hypothetical imperative (these command conditionally on your having a relevant desire, “If you want X, you ought to do Y”).

Immanuel Kant - Ethics of duty III Categorical imperative An unconditional demand comes out of autonomy, reason and universality. How can be this demand be expressed? This is one possible formula of the categorical imperative: “Act only in such a way as you can will that your action should become a universal law." “Act always in such a way that you treat Humanity no only as a mean but as an end in itself.”