Feasibility Study) PB-PG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
Advertisements

Off pump CABG has been performed for the first time 40 years ago. Although conventional CABG is considered both safe and effective, the use of CBP.
Local Improvement following National Clinical Audit The View from a National Clinical Audit Provider – the Health & Social Care Information Centre.
Slides produced by the MBR Project Team
Launch Event – 6 th November 2014 Trial Information and Design Isabel Rubie – Trial Manager The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults: a clinical and.
Use of intra-operative frozen section in surgery for potential early stage ovarian malignancy September 2011 Dr Paul Cross Consultant Cellular Pathologist.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergencies (SAFE) Trial An evaluation of the costs and benefits of computerised on-scene decision support for emergency.
Materials & Methods Prospective study in tertiary oncology centre. PJ used in 15 laparotomies and 6 laparoscopic debulking. Patient demographics, intra.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit Key findings of the Third Annual Report Slides produced by the MBR Project Team. © The National.
D etection of E arly Lung C ancer A mong M ilitary P ersonnel Study 1 Version
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL Title: Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC); Prospective Data Registry in Saudi Arabia Sponsor: Oncology Department, King.
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
Pathologic Analysis of Tumour Destruction with Neutral Plasma in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Madhuri TK 1, Butler-Manuel SA 1, Tailor A 1 & Haagsma B.
, START UP MEETING FOR STAGE 2. Response Rates in Phase 3 Trials Chemotherapy Response rates % Liposomal doxorubicin Gemcitabine 5-9 Gemcitabine.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
1989 Microsoft released ‘Office’ suite Berlin Wall comes down George Bush snr. becomes President USSR pulls out of Afghanistan First NCEPOD Report.
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a focused communication intervention to reduce length of stay for critically ill children in a pediatric intensive.
Improving the quality of medical and surgical care NCEPOD SEPSIS STUDY.
Clinical Trial Designs An Overview. Identify: condition(s) of interest, intended population, planned treatment protocols Recruitment of volunteers: volunteers.
The Role of Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Spinal Surgery The Role of Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Spinal Surgery VA Elwell, N Koo Ng, D Horner & D Peterson.
A Comparative Audit of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Subtotal Hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy and Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy in.
Incidence of hospitalisations in both groups Incidence of documented infections Abstract Problem statement: Patients on cancer chemotherapy are at substantial.
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
Mamoun A. Rahman Surgical SHO Mr Osborne’s team. Introduction Blood transfusion: -Preoperative ( elective) -Intra/postoperative ( urgent) Blood transfusion.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a District General Hospital- Audit of clinical practice.
Use of Bevacizumab in anticoagulated recurrent glioblastoma multiforme patients: An Australian experience Adrian Lee 1,2,3,4, Marina Kastelan 4,5, Helen.
A pilot randomized controlled trial Registry #: NCT
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A comparison of peri- operative outcomes Dr Kate Maclaran, Mr Nilesh Agarwal,
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal R3 김동연 / F. 김선혜.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Macmillan Ipswich Diagnostic Assessment Service (MIDAS)
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
UOG Journal Club: February 2017
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- Summarised
Comprehensive moUth hygiene and Post- operative PneumoniA (CUPPA)
David Mold and Dr. Shubha Allard
Evaluation of CD19 specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR19 T-cells) as an optimal bridge to allogeneic transplantation. Phase I trial for patients.
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Lako S, Daka A, Nurka T, Dedej T, Memishaj S
Figure #1 Overall survival Figure #2 Disease free survival
CLINICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Cancer Diagnosis in the Acute Setting (CaDiAS)
Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2016
Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line– Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units Hangsheng Liu, Carolyn T. A.
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
Concurrent chemotherapy and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation: outcome and survival S.T. Heijkoop1,2; H.C. van.
OPTIMIZING TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER:
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Laparoscopic vs Open Colonic Surgery: Long Term Survival
Tertiary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer:
Professor Stephen Pilling PhD
S1316 analysis details Garnet Anderson Katie Arnold
PROPPR Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma. 
Satya Shanbhag Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit
Intraoperative Cell Salvage
Physical Activity and Endometrial Cancer Survival
Identifying Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism Suitable For Outpatient Treatment A VERITY Registry Pilot Study N Scriven, T Farren, S Bacon, T.
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
Surgical safety checklist trial
Delivering a High quality Intraoperative Cell Salvage Service.
Presentation transcript:

Feasibility Study) PB-PG-1014-35005 Trial of Intraoperative Cell Salvage vs. Transfusion in Ovarian Cancer A Feasibility Study Feasibility Study) PB-PG-1014-35005

Background Ovarian cancer is diagnosed in about 6000 women in England each year. Surgery for ovarian cancer is often extensive (cytoreductive surgery) and can result in substantial blood loss Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is the mainstay for replenishment of blood lost in surgery Currently, donated blood is used to replace blood lost during surgery (usual care). Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Background Strain on blood bank resources Deleterious effects of ABT, especially in oncological surgery Results of several studies have shown an increased incidence of postoperative infection Promotion of tumour growth (which is thought to occur secondary to immunosuppression) and other transfusion reactions Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Background An alternative method of replacing blood is “intraoperative cell salvage” (IOCS) Research has shown that patients who have had their own blood back do better than patients who have donor blood in non-cancer related surgery Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Three studies in gynaecological cancer surgery including a total of 90 patients who received reinfusion of IOCS blood during gynaecological cancer surgery with IOCS and 1312 patients had similar treatment without IOCS, including historical controls No study results showed adverse associations in patients who received salvaged blood, compared with historical controls across all the different clinical outcome measures previously mentioned. Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

However The use of IOCS in ovarian cancer surgery has been held back by concerns of reintroducing cancer cells although, reportedly, 80-100% of these cells have been removed Trial comparing outcomes following IOCS or donor blood in women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer Need to assess the feasibility of conducting this study We shall test the methods to be used in the later trial and the way it will be organised Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Aims and objectives Estimate the likely recruitment rate for the larger trial Provide estimates of likely completeness of outcome data Explore the practical logistics for theatres so that randomisation can be undertaken as late as possible Design data collection tools to collect resource use data from participants, medical records and hospital staff Confirm the resources required to run a larger trial The overall aim of this proposed feasibility study is to ensure that a larger fully powered trial can successfully be planned and delivered. It will test the processes for such a trial, ascertain its feasibility (particularly in relation to recruitment) and provide the necessary information for planning the larger trial. The aim of the future larger trial will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of intra-operative cell salvage for women undergoing debulking surgery for ovarian cancer, compared with usual practice of transfusing donor blood as required. A range of clinical and economic outcomes will be captured (and their capture tested in this feasibility study) but the primary outcome is likely to be overall survival at five years. Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Perceptions of the intervention, the information given, and the advantages and disadvantages of participation Surgeons will also be interviewed to understand their own perspectives on the trial. The qualitative element aims to explore the barriers and facilitators for women when deciding whether or not to participate Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

We are also including three sites to make sure we can test processes Identify factors influencing surgeons’ decisions about whether or not to participate in the study. We intend to mirror many aspects of the future larger trial to test the processes of running that trial. As recruitment is a key issue we are randomizing in this feasibility study to test women’s willingness to accept randomization We are also including three sites to make sure we can test processes Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Trial Design Randomised, multi-centre, parallel group feasibility study in patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer Centres Truro, Plymouth, Gateshead Sixty participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to intra- operative cell salvage (re-infusion of their own blood) or donor (allogeneic) blood transfusion during surgery Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Inclusion Criteria Potential participants must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 18 years old or over Suspected or confirmed ovarian cancer (newly diagnosed) requiring debulking surgery, whether primary or interval (following chemotherapy) ECOG Performance Status 0-1 Willing to participate   Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Exclusion Criteria Potential participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from study participation: Diagnosis of concurrent malignancy Pregnant Allogeneic transfusion during the week prior to surgery Haemoglobinopathies (e.g. sickle cell, thalassaemia) Unwilling to accept donor blood (e.g. on religious grounds)   Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Follow Up All participants will be followed up post-operatively as out- patients at six weeks and again three months later. In addition, participants recruited in the early part of the study will be followed up at subsequent three month intervals as time allows Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Outcome Measures (proposed outcomes for main trial) Overall survival, Progression-free survival EQ-5D-5L EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3.0) Inadvertent visceral injury Return to theatre Surgical site infection Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Outcome Measures (proposed outcomes for main trial) Thromboembolic complications (DVT, PE) Other post-operative complications Amount of allogeneic blood given (total and <24 hours post operation) Length of stay Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Primary surgery Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 3 cycles of chemotherapy Informed consent Hospital admission  Baseline data collection  Randomisation  Operation IOCS (Intra Operative Cell Salvage) Standard Treatment (Allogeneic blood transfusion) 6 week follow-up  Follow-up data collection All participants 3 month follow-up  6 month follow-up  Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018

Thank You Protocol (PB-PG-1014-35005) 17/09/2018