Disproportionality Institute March 29-30, 2018 Little Rock, Arkansas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Special Education Directors Meeting September 2010 Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator, Office of Special Programs.
Advertisements

Disproportionality in Special Education
Moving Mountains: Changing the way we discipline in Washington State Jess Lewis, Behavior and Discipline Program Supervisor.
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Discipline Data – Oregon, Michael K. Mahoney, Safe & Healthy Schools Coordinator Oregon Department of Education
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
August 4, Today’s Agenda 9:00 Welcome Back & Overview 9:30School Improvement Plans 9:45 Writing K-12 10:30Break 10:45Professional Growth Plans 11:00Walk-throughs.
Responding to Special Education Disproportionality Understanding your Data Presenters: Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott, DPI.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
March The Right Children Child Find: Increase the numbers of children identified as Emotionally Disturbed (EmD) and Other Health Impaired (OHI)
Jeopardy The LawDataFiscal CentsCEIS PlanExtras Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
Semester Discipline Data Data Source: District Online Discipline System December 15,
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Equity in IDEA ___________________ NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Michael Yudin Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Ruth.
Agenda 1:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders 1:05 Topics: Statewide Field Test for Fiscal State Application for Title VI-B, RTI Resources, and.
PEIMS / SMS Discipline Update 2013 – 2014
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Addressing Significant Disproportionality: How One State and One LEA Are Using IDC Success Gaps Tools to Make Meaningful Change November 4, 2015 Presented.
WELCOME What is on your table? Agenda for both days
Special Education Discipline
OVER-IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS FOR SERVICES: Special education
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
What is “Annual Determination?”
Appleton Area School District
Discipline Identification and Reporting
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Milwaukee School District
CClick here to get started
Agenda Part I Significant Disproportionality Part II Equity in IDEA Final Rule Overview Part III Standard Methodology Part IV Data Reporting Part V Questions.
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Felton
Addressing Success Gaps in Arkansas:
Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders
SPECIAL EDUCATION DISCIPLINE REPORTS
Data Update State of California
OSE-EIS MAASE February 2010
Presented by Robert Curtin April 11, 2016
Navigating SWIS Webinar
Elementary Hot Topics Summer 2018
Disproportionality Prevention Support
Secondary Hot Topics Summer 2018
Student Discipline Policy Chapter 37
Navigating SWIS Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Significant Disproportionality
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

Disproportionality Institute March 29-30, 2018 Little Rock, Arkansas WELCOME Introductions Blytheville Pine Bluff Dewitt Brinkley Rivercrest What is on your table? Agenda District current Disproportionality Profile Root Cause Flow Chart

HOW DID YOU GET HERE? I-4A & 4B: Discipline Special Education Annual Performance Report Indicators I-4A & 4B: Discipline I-9: Disproportionate Representation in Identification I-10: Disproportionate Representation in a Specific Disability Category

Your Data at a Glance 2017 Indicator 4A (Difference > 1.36)  2017 Indicator 4A (Difference > 1.36)   Indicator 4B (Difference >4) Sp. Ed Rate Gen. Ed. Rate Difference Sp. Ed. Rate for Black Gen. Ed. Rate for All Races Black Difference DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.03% 1.27% 1.76% 10.7 9.44 PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT 6.40% 4.88% 1.52% BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT 7.27% 3.40% 3.87% 7.98 4.59 RIVERCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.92% 0.40% 3.52% 7.69 7.29 BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 6.74% 2.98% 3.76% 8.47 5.50 2018 Indicator 4A (Difference > 1.36)   Indicator 4B (Difference >4) Sp. Ed Rate Gen. Ed. Rate Rate Difference Sp. Ed Rate for Black for All Races Black Difference DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT 6.90 1.02 9.44 PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT 12.67% 5.42% 7.25% 13.11 5.42  7.70 BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT 5.71% 2.65% 3.06% 2.65 4.24 RIVERCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT 2.63% 0.50% 2.13% 10.00 0.50 9.50 BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.70% 1.83% 1.88%

Indicators and Current Methodology Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts that have a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs; and Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies, procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy and do not comply with requirements relating to the development and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards. Significant Difference is identified if the special education rate is 1.36 percentage points higher than the general education rate. Indicators and Current Methodology

Indicators and Current Methodology Indicator 4B: Suspension/Expulsion Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts that have a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs; and Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies, procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy and do not comply with requirements relating to the development and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards. Significant Difference is identified if the rate for a racial/ethnicity category within special education when compared to all racial/ethnic groups in general education is greater than 4 percentage points than the general education rate. Indicators and Current Methodology

Let’s Get Started! Presenters Belinda Kittrell, ADE Research & Technology Cindy Wilkerson, ADE Research & Technology Nancy O’Hara, IDEA Data Center Terry Long, IDEA Data Center

Data Quality Who handles discipline data in the schools? Principal Assistant Principal Secretary Is there a set data entry form used across the district? Is the district using the state codes or having to convert from district codes to the state codes for Cycle 7? Has the person filling out the discipline report been trained on the meaning of the various discipline codes? What is out-of-school suspension vs. expulsion? Do they realize an expulsion requires school board approval? Removal from a building to an ALE or homebound is not an expulsion or suspension? A student moved to homebound for discipline is still enrolled in the building that supports their grade level

Data Quality and eSchool Common Errors The Action Taken was coded as an expulsion because the student has been removed from the building to an alternate setting. Students receiving OSS are coded as expulsion The number of days assigned for in-school and out-of-school suspensions are duplicative. One incident 3 infractions Insubordination Fighting Tobacco Action Taken OSS for three days Number of days entered 9 3 per infraction What should have been entered? One day per infraction totaling 3 days Data Quality and eSchool

Root Cause & Moles ISSUE: You have moles in your yard and they are tunneling, creating holes, and tearing up your landscape. How do you get rid of them? What do you know about Moles? Why is your yard interesting to moles? What strategies would you implement to rid you yard of moles? Kill the moles Pour chemicals down the holes to kill the moles Blow up the holes like in Caddy Shack Fill the holes with water Repel the moles with Mothballs Caster Oil Peppermint Ultrasonic solar garden stakes What else???

Next Steps and TimeLine One month to finish rubric and plans in Excel. Email the completed Rubric in Excel to jafields@ualr.edu by May 1, 2018. Letters notifying the districts of their disproportionate identification and the required review of policies, procedures, and practices will be sent in the next two weeks. What is Next?