IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ May 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/210r2 May 2001 IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ TG1 Opening Report November 2001 Austin, TX USA Ian Gifford, Consultant Ian Gifford, Consultant

Contents Summary Motion Planning Overview of Session #15/Austin May 2001 Contents Summary Motion Planning Overview of Session #15/Austin Objectives Submissions Session Graphic RevCom Submission [01462r1aP802-15_WG-P802.15.1-RevCom-Submission.pdf] Project Planning Status Next Meeting Tentative Needs for Dallas Objectives for Dallas Drafting History Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 Summary [1 of 3] Task Group 1 (TG1) is deriving a draft standard from the Bluetooth™ specification under IEEE PAR 802.15.1 At Session #15, motion SEC, address WG & SEC comments, IF ANY achieve majority approval from the WG & SEC motions and enter RevCom phase. Pre submitted 26Oct01. During the Jul01/Nov01 between-session-period SB1 ballot & resolution SB2 ballot & RevCom Application for approval of P802.15.1 IEEE-SA, PatCom, RevCom, and BSIG Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/210r2 May 2001 Summary [2 of 3] SB2 has 2 Disapproving Voters and 19 unresolved comments (comment #7 is resolved as the 3rd DISAPPROVING Voter changed to a YES w/ comments.) The TG1 will update 00375r3P802-15_TG1-Project-Planning.pdf once SEC approval is achieved. ETA 17Nov01. Ian Gifford, Consultant Ian Gifford, Consultant

Summary [3 of 3] The 802.15.1 submittal will be reviewed by RevCom. May 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/210r2 May 2001 Summary [3 of 3] The 802.15.1 submittal will be reviewed by RevCom. Preliminary comments will be sent to Project 802.15.1 by the middle of November. Scheduled StB Committee Meetings 4-6Dec01: http://standards.ieee.org/board/stdsbd/meeting-notice.html 4Dec01 PatCom - 6.2 Letter of Assurance from Bluetooth SIG, Inc. for P802.15.1 5Dec01 RevCom - P802.15.1/D1.0.1 New: "Standard for Information Technology… Ian Gifford, Consultant Ian Gifford, Consultant

Planned Motions Motions #1 Wed, 14Nov01 to Full WG May 2001 Planned Motions Motions #1 Wed, 14Nov01 to Full WG #2 Fri, 16Nov01 to SEC Ian Gifford, Consultant

Session #15/Austin – Motion #1 to the Full WG May 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/210r2 May 2001 Session #15/Austin – Motion #1 to the Full WG Move to submit P802.15.1/D1.0.1-2001 to 802 SEC for approval of submission to RevCom. Non Technical 50% (Procedural) Moved: ? Second: ? Y/N/A: // Again, there were a total of 412 comments and we believe that 122 are directly related to Bluetooth's Specifications. 3 kinds of comments: 53 Yellow = Technical [these are important e.g., technical peer review commentary and IEEE P802.15 would like the Bluetooth SIG to review and advise on their ability to include these into the errata process to be considered for inclusion to the v1.0B Bluetooth Specification?] 26 White = Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) [these are important but relate to separate Bluetooth documents and *not* the Core & Profiles Specifications. I believe that the following BSIG Promoter/IEEE 802.15 Members Dr. Fujio Watanabe <fwatanabe@ieee.org> and Mr. Arto Palin <arto.palin@nokia.com> are dealing directly with these comments in terms of the Bluetooth Test Specifications.] 43 Blue = Editorial [these are less important e.g., grammar, typo's, etc. but should be considered in the errata process too.] Note: They are provided sequentially in these colors on the Worksheet. Note: TG1 pre-submitted D1.0.1 to RevCom on 26Oct01. Ian Gifford, Consultant Ian Gifford, Consultant

Session #15/Austin – Motion #2 to the 802 SEC May 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/210r2 May 2001 Session #15/Austin – Motion #2 to the 802 SEC Move that the ExCom forward IEEE Draft 802.15.1/D1.0.1 to RevCom. Non Technical 50% (Procedural) Moved: ? Second: ? Y/N/A: // Again, there were a total of 412 comments and we believe that 122 are directly related to Bluetooth's Specifications. 3 kinds of comments: 53 Yellow = Technical [these are important e.g., technical peer review commentary and IEEE P802.15 would like the Bluetooth SIG to review and advise on their ability to include these into the errata process to be considered for inclusion to the v1.0B Bluetooth Specification?] 26 White = Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) [these are important but relate to separate Bluetooth documents and *not* the Core & Profiles Specifications. I believe that the following BSIG Promoter/IEEE 802.15 Members Dr. Fujio Watanabe <fwatanabe@ieee.org> and Mr. Arto Palin <arto.palin@nokia.com> are dealing directly with these comments in terms of the Bluetooth Test Specifications.] 43 Blue = Editorial [these are less important e.g., grammar, typo's, etc. but should be considered in the errata process too.] Note: They are provided sequentially in these colors on the Worksheet. Note: TG1 pre-submitted D1.0.1 to RevCom on 26Oct01. Ian Gifford, Consultant Ian Gifford, Consultant

Session #15/Austin – Graphic May 2001 Session #15/Austin – Graphic Ian Gifford, Consultant

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ May 2001 IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks™ Sponsor Ballots (SBs) Summary Report Ian Gifford, Consultant

SBs Summary Report Sponsor Ballot #1, passed @89% May 2001 SBs Summary Report Sponsor Ballot #1, passed @89% 30 Day Electronic Ballot 27Jul01 Opened 25Aug01 Closed Sponsor Ballot #2, passed @89% 10 Day Electronic Recirculation Ballot 2Oct01 Opened 11Oct01 Closed The BRC continues to communicate to the three (3) DISAPPROVING Balloters and we are happy to report that one (1) DISAPPROVING Balloter has reviewed the resolutions and changed his initial and recirculation vote from DISAPPROVING to YES WITH COMMENTS (see –01/420r10 Comment #7) on 12Oct01. This 3 to 2 change to the sponsor ballots up the affirmation to 93%. Ian Gifford, Consultant

SB1 Summary Report P802.15.1/D0.9.2 Closing date: 2001-08-25 May 2001 SB1 Summary Report P802.15.1/D0.9.2 Closing date: 2001-08-25 The report is the result from the group: 0000130 1. This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement. 33 eligible people in this ballot group. 26 affirmative votes 3 negative votes 1 abstention votes 30 votes received 90% returned 3% abstention 2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. 29 votes 89% affirmative Source: -01/420r10 Ian Gifford, Consultant

Generalization of Negative Comments May 2001 Generalization of Negative Comments Proposed standard operates in the same band as 802.11 Coexistence not addressed Optional power level of 100mw Normative vs. Informative SDL Technical disagreements (how it works vs. how it might work better) Ian Gifford, Consultant

Tentative Needs for Jan02 Interim May 2001 Tentative Needs for Jan02 Interim 21-25Jan02 (5 Days) ~0 People TG1 leadership is not planning to attend the Jan02 Interim. Ian Gifford, Consultant

May 2001 In conclusion, the Project 802.15.1 would like to leave you with this slide  Ian Gifford, Consultant