Reduce Your Return Mail by One Third! National Postal Forum Nashville TN March 20–23, 2005 Jan Caldwell, Address Management Sharon Harrison, SBC Liz Weber,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Indispensable Quality Assurance Tool for Dairy Processing Plants.
Advertisements

6 Sigma Consulting
Move Update & Compliance Fundamentals M & W Printers and United States Postal Service.
© 2006 FedEx. All rights reserved. FedEx Ship Manager ® at fedex.com Shipping Administration.
{Customer} Divisions Plan {Date} – {Version} Salesforce.com.
User Guide TE Connectivity Data Collection Tool (DCT) January 2012.
Project Management with VIVA PPM Tool (Project Portfolio Management)
Open Enrollment Required Notices September 13, 2011.
The 4 T’s of Test Automation:
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
Air Permitting : Process Improvement Kaizen Event June 4 – 8, 2007 Transforming Government- the challenge and opportunity of the 21st century.
© Xchanging 2008, no part of this document may be circulated, quoted or reproduced without prior written approval of Xchanging. Accounting & Settlement.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
In November, the USPS will make all mail smarter & reduce waste Facts the U.S.P.S. Wants You to Know Each year, over 2 BILLION pieces of mail are discarded.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S.A.F. 1 Commodity Councils 101 NAME (S) SAF/AQCDATE.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
S-Curves & the Zero Bug Bounce:
Introduction to Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Strategic Meetings Management 101
“The Honeywell Web-based Corrective Action Solution”
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
© 2005 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. 11 July 2005 AT&T Enhanced VPN Services Performance Reporting and Web Tools Presenter : Sam Levine x111.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
1 Public Service Commission On-line Test Order Form.
Greg Staveley Manager Business Customer Delivery August 2013 Managing Backflow program growth – Issues and solutions The Sydney Water approach.
1 FL EDI R3 Test Requirements Rule 69L , F.A.C.
The role of supplier networks in financial transformation.
– SIS SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES ICH USER GROUP MEETING KUALA LUMPUR OCTOBER 2010.
These presentation slides are designed as content for AP Change Makers building their own internal presentations on the subject of Accounts Payable Automation.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Patty Helphenstine & Roslyn Thomas, CMS
New “Link” Products & Address Quality Tools National Postal Forum Nashville, Tennessee March 20 th -23 rd, 2005 Steve Dearing & Jim Wilson Steve Dearing.
1 Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Overview and Value of Intelligent Mail ®
ZONE ANALYSIS PROGRAM (ZAP) & PERIODICALS ANNUAL POSTAGE PAYMENT REVIEW.
 Each year, 17% of Americans move or change their mailing address 1 out of every 6 families moves each year  Approximately 19% of all businesses move.
Stump The Experts With Your Uncodable – Undeliverable-As-Addressed Mail National Postal Forum April 11 – 14, 2010 Jim Wilson, Manager Address Management,
Telecom Lifecycle Management Solutions for Sales Partners.
University of Southern California Enterprise Wide Information Systems Functionality and the Reference Model Instructor: Richard W. Vawter.
Mail Management Made Easy A Division of We Do The Work While You Enjoy The Savings!
United States Postal Service ® ANK Link ™ The New Address Quality Tool Intelligent Mail Address Quality WEBCAST Monday August 15, 2005 National Customer.
1 Understand The Differences in the Change-of-Address Programs National Postal Forum March 17 – 20, 2013 Michael Tate, SVP Enterprise Postal Strategy,
Total Address Quality. Total Address Quality 2 OSV At A Glance OSV produces over 500 Million envelopes every year! OSV processes over 4 Million addresses.
Mail Services Survey 121 Completed Survey, Thank You Satisfaction levels ranged from 72-1/2 % up to 91.7% Awareness & usage of service were lower In the.
The ROI of Address Quality Charles Hunt Address Management USPS ® Chris Lien Executive Vice President BCC Software Inc A Böwe Bell + Howell Company.
Best Kept Secrets of the NCSC Keeping You in the Know! Speakers: Adam Avrick – Design Distributors Inc Cosmo Infantolino – USPS.
® TOTAL ADDRESS QUALITY & CASS ™ CYCLE “L” Ed WantaBaltimore PCC Address ManagementJune 1, 2007.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
Importance of Address Element Correction Jan Caldwell Manager, Address Management MTAC Meeting Washing DC, October 28,
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations November 18, 2010.
Current Projects in DTEI Presented By: Tracy Jordan.
Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Improving Change-of-Address System For Colleges/Universities.
MTAC 117 Performance Based Verification Sept 17, 2007.
1 Gary Reblin and Jan Caldwell Intelligent Mail & Address Quality Intelligent MAIL ™ in the U. S. Postal Service MTAC February 5, 2004.
1 Added Services and Values Using the Intelligent Mail ® Barcode.
1 MTAC Work Group 136 Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data November 2010.
Complete, Correct, and Current Addresses  Complete the address  Leverage software and data to provide the missing information  ZIP + 4®, street name,
 ReadSoft 2006 Brian Hrabovsky Oracle Specialist Deniz Kuypers Western Regional Manager Best-in-class companies report 91% lower invoice processing cost…
MTAC Work Group 136 Kick-Off Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data June 7, 2010.
1 Move Update February Move Update Nov. 23, 2008  Move Update required for mailpieces claiming Presorted or Automation prices for First-Class®
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
CASS ™ Cycle Changes/Next Update Jan Caldwell Manager, Address Management United States Postal Service MTAC Meeting Oct. 31 – Nov. 2, 2006 Washington DC.
Administrative Cost Savings through Invoice Verification.
Quality Health Claims Consultants, LLC City of Joliet Dependent Verification Audit Proposal.
What Are Bad Addresses – Xactly? 1 What are “Bad” Addresses & What Do You Do With Them – Xactly? National Postal Forum Anaheim, CA May 18 th – 21 th, 2007.
Demystifying UAA Mail Where did it come from? How can we fix it? National Postal Forum March 20 – 23, 2016 Jim Wilson, A/Director, Addressing & Geospatial.
Insider Connectivity Review & Savings Analysis
Return on Investment of the Recruiting Process
Return on Investment of the Recruiting Process
Reduce Your Return Mail By One Third
Presentation transcript:

Reduce Your Return Mail by One Third! National Postal Forum Nashville TN March 20–23, 2005 Jan Caldwell, Address Management Sharon Harrison, SBC Liz Weber, Capital One

ADDRESS QUALITY OPPORTUNITIES ADDRESS QUALITY OPPORTUNITIES Customer Contact with Business Customer Address Changes Business Generates Mail Business Enters Mail USPS Accepts Mail USPS Processes Mail USPS Delivers Mail 2

Reduce Your Return Mail by One Third! Sharon Harrison, SBC

SBC COMPANY OVERVIEW SBC - Global Telecommunications Company Mailing 30M+ Customer Bills each month Two Mail Manufacturing Facilities West Sacramento & Houston Annual USPS Postage from SBC = 125M+ REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

Reduce undeliverable-as-addressed (UAA) mail to ensure customer bills are delivered accurately & timely! Ensure bill mailing address is compliant to USPS addressing standards to reduce cost and improve deliverability. QUALITY ADDRESSING GOALS REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

RESOLVING THE PROBLEM SBC Quality Studies defined: Need to get the correct address at the front-end of the process! Improve 30% of addresses during initial capture on front-end ordering validation system using CASS/DPV (USPS certified systems) Coding Accuracy Support Systems Delivery Point Validation REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

DEFINED OPPORTUNITY Reduce calls to/from business offices Reduce calls to/from collection offices Reduce mailing (postage, material, production) costs for products mailed Improve postage discounts on address match Reduce cost for returns managed Improve cash flow Meet USPS address standards/requirements REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY/ PROCESS 1. Track the amount of returned mail received 2. Determine average return rate for industry 3. Identify percentage match rate for CASS 4. Obtain support from company Quality Teams 5. Evaluate reasons for mail returned using internal sources/USPS data REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY/ PROCESS 6. Perform follow-up study (90 days later) to evaluate total business impact 7. Document customer impact (disconnects, additional calls, loss of customers, etc.) 8. Identify business cost/savings with reduced calls, customer impacts, mailing costs, etc. 9. Identify solutions for incomplete/inaccurate addressing with front-end validation REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY/ PROCESS 10. Evaluate address fields/lengths to ensure space to support validation results 11. Evaluate technology solutions and identify potential cost 12. Identify business savings opportunity 13. Obtain Executive Management and Financial Teams support to evaluate business opportunities and savings to approve plan REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY/ PROCESS 14. Develop a technology model for validating address data - ensure override capability for new addresses not yet defined 15. Ensure representatives are trained to ensure optimal performance of tool for deployment 16. Evaluate performance once deployed to ensure returned mail reductions REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

CHALLENGES Multiple organizations impacted across SBC Size and scope of SBC systems to modify field length changes CASS/DPV functionality not separated Ordering system screen limitations Multiple legacy systems/applications with non- centralized customer database and data feeds Interfacing with outsourced systems New/emerging systems REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

MEASURING SUCCESS Returned mail volumes - reduced over 30% Improvements in CASS matching Reduction of mailed pieces Reduced customer calls & complaints REDUCE YOU RETURNED MAIL BY ONE THIRD

Capital One, USPS, and ACS Change Service Requested – Option 2 Liz Weber, Capital One

Capital One began using Change Service Requested in Sept 03 when we entered into an NSA with the USPS n Due to our large 1 st class volumes, Capital One has proportionately large return mail volumes n Without the Change Service Requested endorsement 1 st class UAA pieces are required to be physically returned to the mail owner n Prior to the NSA we have always captured our physical returned pieces CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2 Continue…

n Change Service Requested – Option 2: n This endorsement is an indicator to the USPS to capture the mailpiece return information electronically n Thus allowing for the USPS to destroy those physical mailpieces as opposed to transporting them back to Capital One n If it is a COA record the mailpiece is forwarded to the new address on file n An ACS COA notice is provided back to Capital One with the new address CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2

We tested into Change Service Requested prior to the full implementation of the NSA n Initial testing showed electronic return rates lower than what was expected n Capital One partnered with the USPS to diagnose potential causes n The USPS created training documentation for the field to ensure proper handling of all Capital One 1 st class return mail CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2 Continue…

n Capital One created internal training documentation around the production elements to ensure proper formatting on all our 1 st class mailpieces n Additional testing performed with an adapted endorsement to improve electronic return percentages n Mutual reporting shared on a monthly basis identified differences in capturing the return percentages Electronic Return Percentages moved from 60% to 85% CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2

Return mail volumes declined significantly from 03 to 04 despite an initial spike in return volumes in early 04 n Early 04 testing with an adapted endorsement failed, which initially increased our physical return mail volumes n Even with that increase in return mail we still achieved an overall decrease in the amount of mail being returned CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2 Continue…

n COA Records updates account for much of that decrease n Prior to our implementation of ACS we did not have insight into the mail which was forwarded n With this implementation, COA information is sent to Capital One on a daily basis and our system is updated in real time n This allows us to make the next contact with that potential customer in a more timely manner CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2

Return Mail 2004 * Return with COA data indexed to 100 There is a wealth of information when you have access to the COA data…..

Return Mail Postage Spend Comparison *2003 data indexed to 100 ….as well there is a significant reduction in postage spend when applied appropriately.

In addition to mailing more efficiently we have achieved other savings n The returned physical pieces sent to our return mail supplier has decreased substantially, creating an operational savings of $1MM n We have been able to use this data to create a suppression strategy based on the nixie codes received thus creating additional savings CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2 Continue…

n Additional benefits: n Real time data - A file is pulled on a daily basis and loaded into a Capital One database n Fresh address data n Additional analysis opportunities CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2

The implementation of ACS has been mutually beneficial to the USPS and Capital One n Partnering with the USPS early on in the process allowed for a successful rollout n Monitoring performance on a monthly basis, has steadily increased performance n Savings have been realized by Capital One through the use of the data CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2 Continue…

n The data has also allowed Capital One to invest postage $ more efficiently n The USPS has been able to cut transportation costs by not having to physically return those UAA mailpieces CAPITAL ONE, USPS, AND ACS CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED – OPTION 2

Questions Customer Care:

Thank You!