Parallelized Coupled Solver (PCS) Model Refinements & Extensions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lakshmi Sankar Module 3.3 Panel Methods Lakshmi Sankar
Advertisements

Lift Theories Linear Motion.
Adjoint-based Unsteady Airfoil Design Optimization with Application to Dynamic Stall Karthik Mani Brian Lockwood Dimitri Mavriplis University of Wyoming.
CFD II w/Dr. Farouk By: Travis Peyton7/18/2015 Modifications to the SIMPLE Method for Non-Orthogonal, Non-Staggered Grids in k- E Turbulence Flow Model.
CFD Simulation: MEXICO Rotor Wake
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
A Computational Efficient Algorithm for the Aerodynamic Response of Non-Straight Blades Mac Gaunaa, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, Niels Nørmark Sørensen & Mads.
Analysis of rotor wake measurements with the inverse vortex wake model Second PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe October Risø National Laboratory.
Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Dr. Sven Schmitz University of California, Davis Computational Modeling of Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Helicopter Hover Flow Using Hybrid CFD Pennsylvania.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
1 A Computational Aeroacoustics Approach to Trailing Edge Noise Prediction using the Nonlinear Disturbance Equations James P. Erwin Philip J. Morris Kenneth.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy
CHAPTER 8 ADDITIONAL SUBJECTS IN FUNDMENTALS OF FLOW Dr. Ercan Kahya.
Pharos University ME 253 Fluid Mechanics II
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Global Analysis of Floating Structures – M.H. Kim
Incompressible Flow over Airfoils
Aerospace Modeling Tutorial Lecture 2 – Basic Aerodynamics
TOWER SHADOW MODELIZATION WITH HELICOIDAL VORTEX METHOD Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Motivations Review of Vortex Model.
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
Tim Fletcher Post-doctoral Research Assistant Richard Brown Mechan Chair of Engineering Simulating Wind Turbine Interactions using the Vorticity Transport.
HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL FOR WIND TURBINE AEROELASTIC SIMULATION Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine.
Panel methods to Innovate a Turbine Blade-1 P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Linear Mathematics for Invention of Blade Shape…..
Airfoil Design for a Helicopter rotor blade Oct Han Gil Chae.
1 Fluidic Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades C.S. Boeije, H. de Vries, I. Cleine, E. van Emden, G.G.M Zwart, H. Stobbe, A. Hirschberg, H.W.M. Hoeijmakers.
CFD Applications for Marine Foil Configurations Volker Bertram, Ould M
Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows
Supervisor: Dr David Wood Co-Supervisor: Dr Curran Crawford
Thin Aerofoil Theory for Development of A Turbine Blade
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
External flow over immersed bodies If a body is immersed in a flow, we call it an external flow. Some important external flows include airplanes, motor.
WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
1/50 1 Effect of Trailing Edge Geometry on the Flow Behavior through Rectilinear Turbine Cascades By: Mahmoud M. El-Gendi Supervisor: Prof. Yoshiaki Nakamura.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 28, 29,30-Unsteady aerodynamics 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Chapter 4 Fluid Mechanics Frank White
Free vs. Forced Convection
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Ship Hydrodynamics - Resistance
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
AERODYNAMICS.
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
Panel methods to Innovate a Turbine Blade
Betz Theory for A Blade Element
Aerofoil Theory : Development of Turbine Blade
Actual Power Developed by A Rotor
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
Panel Methods.
APISAT 2010 Sep. 13~15, 2010, Xi’An, China
Design and Analysis of Wind Turbines using Dynamic Stall Effects
Application of STAR-CCM+ to Helicopter Rotors in Hover
Theory and its application
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
topic16_cylinder_flow_relaxation
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
VALIDATION OF A HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL WITH THE NREL UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC EXPERIMENT James M. Hallissy and Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California.
Draft Tube Flow.
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
CASA Day 9 May, 2006.
Presentation transcript:

Parallelized Coupled Solver (PCS) Model Refinements & Extensions Sven Schmitz University of California, Davis GE Wind November 29th, 2007 Greenville, SC Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

Outline 2007 Parallelized Coupled Navier-Stokes/Vortex-Panel Solver - PCS Nacelle Model, Latest version. 2008 Extension of Lifting-Line (LL) to Lifting-Surface (LS) - PCS Vortex-Lattice type method on the blade surface. ‘Quasi-Steady’ PCS - PCS-Q Quasi-Steady RANS/Vortex Model, Solution methodology for N blades. ‘Unsteady’ PCS - PCS-U Time-accurate RANS/Vortex Model, Solution methodology for N blades. Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

Coupling of NS Solver with Vortex Method 2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U Navier-Stokes Vortex Method Vortex Filament Biot-Savart Law (discrete) Boundary of Navier-Stokes Zone Converged for … Bound Vortex Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

No feedback from GE so far. 2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U Nacelle Model : GEWIND-PCS_2_0.tar (avail. to GE) Nacelle is approximated as a non-rotating ‘Rankine Body’. User Input : Height, Width, Axial Location (dimens. by R) Model finds position/strength of Source/Sink pair. Influence coefficients are added to each point in RANS boundary. => … acts as a perturbation to the incoming wind speed Uwind. May reduce need for complex blade/nacelle grid topology. No feedback from GE so far. Latest Version : GEWIND-PCS_2_1.tar (avail. to GE) New version of asymptotics for influence coefficients [Chattot, 2007]. Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U Extension of Lifting-Line (LL) to Lifting-Surface (LS) - PCS Motivation : Current PCS limited to LL at blade ¼ chord, vortex filaments emanating from trailing edge (TE). Bound Vorticity GjB concentrated at LL. => Effect of LL position unclear. Spread LL (respect. GjB ) along sectional chord to receive … Gi,jB with Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U Extension of Lifting-Line (LL) to Lifting-Surface (LS) - PCS Implementation : Obtain Gi,jB from GjB using … ‘Parabolic Plate’ vorticity distribution on RANS mesh. Treat each blade surface element in RANS zone as an ‘Elemental Horseshoe Vortex’ located on the blade’s sectional camber line. Determine influence coefficients for the Lifting-Surface (LS). (… at small computational expense) Satisfy the following conditions … Trailing Vortex Bound Vortex Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U ‘Quasi-Steady’ PCS - PCS-Q Motivation : Current (steady) PCS limited to zero-yaw condition. Extension of PCS as an efficient hybrid method for wind turbine blade analysis under yawed flow conditions. Implementation : Extend vortex model to account for yaw in vortex structure. Neglect ‘shed’ vorticity. Solution methodology of a N-bladed wind turbine in yawed flow. Converge to steady-state at each azimuth angle. PCS-Q is suitable for small yaw angles (<15deg), yet not capable of handling ‘dynamic stall’ and/or ‘blunt trailing edge airfoils’. Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

‘Quasi-Steady’ PCS - PCS-Q 2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U ‘Quasi-Steady’ PCS - PCS-Q y=0deg Solve N blades Vortex Model BC – u,v,w Converged to steady-state y=y+Dy 1/N Revolutions completed. CFX Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U ‘Unsteady’ PCS - PCS-U Motivation : PCS-Q limited to small yaw angles. Extension of PCS-Q to a fully ‘unsteady’ hybrid method. Implementation : Extend vortex model of PCS-Q to account for ‘shed’ vorticity in vortex structure. (Perform subiterations on convection equation along helicoidal sheet) Solution methodology of a N-bladed wind turbine in yawed flow. Time-accurate solution of RANS/Vortex Model. PCS-U is capable of handling ‘dynamic stall’ and/or ‘blunt trailing edge airfoils’ through a fully unsteady solution methodology. Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

‘Unsteady’ PCS - PCS-U CFX y=0deg Solve N blades Vortex Model y=y+Dy 2007 - PCS 2008 - PCS 2008 - PCS-Q 2008 - PCS-U ‘Unsteady’ PCS - PCS-U y=0deg Solve N blades Vortex Model BC – u,v,w Converged or # subiterations y=y+Dy # Revolutions until solution is periodic. CFX Converged Schmitz GE Wind - PCS

Research Proposal 2008 Extension of Lifting-Line (LL) to Lifting-Surface (LS) - PCS Useful extension of steady PCS. ‘Quasi-Steady’ PCS - PCS-Q 1st Step towards fully unsteady PCS, yet limited in capability. ‘Unsteady’ PCS - PCS-U Time-accurate extension of PCS-Q. PCS-Q/PCS-U require extended implementation/validation time. Detailed model specifications are to be discussed. Schmitz GE Wind - PCS