Development of 2016 Alpha Version Activity Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

U.S. States Abbreviations Directions: Type the state abbreviation in the box on each slide. “The English language website where everything.
Company LOGO U. S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Southeast Region States Contained in the region: Alabama (AL) Florida (FL) Georgia (GA) Mississippi (MS) Louisiana (LA) Arkansas (AR) Tennessee (TN)
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
Geography Bee Meeting 3: United States Cities and Landforms (While you wait, please insert your microphones and adjust your volume.)
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
USA ILLUSTRATIONS – US CHARACTER Go ahead and replace it with your own text. This is an example text. Go ahead and replace it with your own text Go ahead.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
2012 IFTA / IRP MANAGERS’AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WORKSHOP
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1994 – 2014
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The United States.
1 Washington, WA 2 Oregon, OR 3 California, CA 4 Arizona, AZ 5 Nevada, NE 6 Utah, UT 7 Idaho, ID 8 Montana, MT 9 Wyoming, WY 10 Colorado, CO 11 New Mexico,
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Maps.
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Updates to 2014NEIv2 Onroad Mobile Emissions
Department of Environmental Quality
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
U.S. FEDERAL CIRCUITS Cir State 11 Alabama AL
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Regions of the United States
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
United States of America.
Presidential Electoral College Map
Tennessee Texas What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation? Where is it located? Nashville What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation?
2012 US Presidential Election Result
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

Development of 2016 Alpha Version Activity Data January 18, 2018 Alison Eyth EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Overall 2016 Development Plan Alpha version: February, 2018 Composed using currently available components 2016 for onroad, nonroad, fires, biogenics Use 2014NEIv2 for the rest of the sectors For EGUs, mixing 2014NEIv2 annual with 2016 CEMS in SMOKE is problematic (annual/hourly interactions) EPA may be able to provide 2016 EGU point based on 2014v1 Draft 2016 point inventory should be available in March Beta version: Summer, 2018 Will incorporate state inputs for key sectors and updates from workgroups available by that time 2023 and 2028 projections by fall 2016v1 final platform: Winter, 2019 Include final set up & emissions for 2016, 2023, 2028 US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

2014-16 Platform Release Plans EPA is currently working on 2014NATAv2 Based on 2014NEIv2 – should be wrapped up this month EPA is working on a 2015 modeling case 2015 for onroad, nonroad, biogenics, fires 2014NEIv2 for the rest of the U.S. 2013 for Canada, Interpolated data for Mexico EPA has components of 2016 available 2016 for nonroad, biogenics, fires (draft) 2016 onroad emission factors compatible with 2014NEIv2 – plans for activity data discussed today Goal: release emissions platform SMOKE INPUTS and scripts for ‘14, ‘15, and ‘16 in February Processed AQM-ready emissions will not be available US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

2016 Platform Onroad Plans February 2018: alpha version of onroad 2016 emission factors compatible with 2014 v2 Uses updated speeds, light-duty splits, fuels, temporal distn. Age distributions consistent with 2014 (not projected) 2016 activity data to be quickly developed April 2018 Receive any S/L desired changes to 2016 activity data and representative counties Would anyone want to provide 2023 and 2028 activity data? Summer 2018 Incorporate provided inputs into beta version* Develop future year projections* * pending available resources US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Activity Data Needs for Onroad On-roadway emissions Exhaust, evaporative, evaporative permeation, refueling, brake and tire wear Primary inputs: vehicle miles traveled (VMT), average speeds, speed profiles, and temperature (gridded, hourly) Off-network emissions (i.e. parked vehicles) Exhaust, evaporative, evaporative permeation, refueling Evaporative fuel vapor venting: hot soak (immediately after a trip) and diurnal (vehicle parked for a long period) Primary inputs: vehicle population (VPOP) and Temperature (gridded, hourly, daily min/max) Hoteling: Extended idle and auxiliary power units (APU) for combination long-haul trucks Primary inputs: Hoteling hours and T (gridded, hourly) VMT and HOTELLING are temporalized, others aren’t US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Onroad Emissions Preparation Hourly Met. Data from WRF* Meteorological Preprocessor (Met4Moves) MOVES Temperature ranges, rel. humidity Run MOVES to get emission factors (EFs) for representative counties for each temperature and speed needed EF tables Gridded met Use representative EFs with county/ grid-specific activity data and hourly meteorology to create emissions for all counties Activity Data SMOKE * WRF = Weather Research and Forecasting model AQ model-ready files US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Representative Counties 3000+ US counties are mapped to 303 representative counties according to: state, fuels, age distribution, ramp fraction, inspection & maintenance (I/M) programs, and emissions standards The criteria for selecting rep. counties was discussed on MJO in June, 2017 The selection spreadsheet will be available with the v2 documentation Emphasize the county specific activity and the grid specific meteorology is used even if using rep counties. US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Overview of VMT Development 2014 NEI VMT Data used: County-level VMT (VM2) from FHWA by road type Use county population data to fill gaps in FHWA data VMT by county and road type County population data from U.S. Census VMT by county, road type, and HPMS vehicle type Allocate VMT by road type to HPMS vehicle types FHWA fractions (VM4) vehicle type by road type VMT by county, road type, and MOVES vehicle type Distribute VMT to MOVES vehicle types IHS 2014 vehicle populations VMT by county, MOVES road type, vehicle type, and fuel type Distribute VMT to MOVES fuel types and road types IHS fuel fractions

New Data Available for 2016 Our preliminary 2016 VMT developed last summer used AEO 2017 to project to year 2016 by fuel and vehicle Update: FHWA has recently released some of their data for 2016 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statist ics/2016/ VM-2 data has vehicle miles traveled by state Includes Urban/Rural and “Functional System” (i.e., road type) FHWA provided county-specific VM-2 data to EPA US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Creating 2016 VMT from 2014 The preferred approach for the alpha version is to adjust the 2014 VMT to 2016 levels Retain splits by road type, vehicle type, fuel, etc. EPA filled in missing data into county-level FHWA VM-2 data Local roads and some minor collectors not provided Computed magnitude from state totals and allocated to counties based on population Converted from FHWA to MOVES road types Computed 2014-2016 factors by county and road type, county overall, and county urban+rural 2016v2 onroad VMT projection factors.xlsx US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Review of county-specific factors The computed county-specific factors had much more spread that was anticipated for a two-year change Expected change in 2 years was +/- 10% Overall county factors varied from 0.46 to 2.74 Road type-specific factors even broader 593 county factors outside of +/- 10% Some states had more “out of range” factors than others: TX had 142 counties, GA had 85, WI had 26, NC had 27, FL had 20, KS had 16, MI had 17, NM had 15, ND had 17, AR had 16, IN had 14 FHWA program is a similar to NEI in that state DOTs submit their VMT to DOT for collation GA confirmed with their DOT that methods changed between 14 and 16 – others states may have also US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

State-specific factors Due to the variability in the county-specific factors, state-road type and state-overall factors were also computed Functional system-specific factors can be computed based on FHWA state VM-2 for 2014 and 2016 Overall state factors range from -1.4% (WY) to 14.1% (UT) State-road type factors by functional system have more spread, but outliers tend to have little VMT in those road types Factors by MOVES road type are next and in state-road 2014-16 growth factors from VM-2.xlsx US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

AL to KS Factors STATE rural restricted rural unrestricted urban restricted urban unrestricted all rural all urban total Alabama 9.0% 4.4% 7.3% 4.9% 5.4% 5.5% Alaska 11.5% 10.7% 7.0% 11.0% 6.3% 8.3% Arizona 9.1% -4.0% 5.1% 6.9% 1.1% 5.0% Arkansas 4.7% 4.8% California 24.3% -9.4% 7.5% -1.8% 2.4% 2.2% Colorado 10.3% 4.0% 8.2% 5.7% 6.0% 6.7% 6.5% Connecticut 1.3% 2.1% 0.8% 1.4% Delaware 7.8% 3.6% 13.0% 6.8% 6.1% Dist. of Columbia N/A 2.7% Florida 13.2% 8.8% 10.9% 5.3% 6.6% 7.2% Georgia 10.2% 18.7% 6.4% 16.4% 10.1% Hawaii 7.6% 2.9% 4.2% 4.5% Idaho 28.2% -2.0% 27.4% 2.6% Illinois -0.4% 3.4% 2.0% 2.3% Indiana 9.2% 11.7% -1.1% 1.5% Iowa 6.2% Kansas 8.0% -0.1% US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

KY to NY Factors STATE rural restricted rural unrestricted urban restricted urban unrestricted all rural all urban total Kentucky 6.8% 0.1% 4.0% 2.9% 2.5% 3.3% Louisiana -1.2% -7.4% 14.6% 3.5% -5.5% 7.1% 1.9% Maine -7.7% -1.7% 42.4% 14.5% -3.0% 21.2% 3.8% Maryland 24.4% -0.1% 5.6% 5.0% 4.8% Massachusetts 36.3% 32.5% 6.4% 6.0% 33.8% 6.2% 7.4% Michigan 8.0% 3.2% -0.6% 0.7% 2.1% Minnesota 1.8% 8.7% -0.3% 2.7% 3.0% 2.8% Mississippi 25.6% -2.6% 8.6% 3.7% Missouri 10.0% 1.7% 4.3% 4.1% 4.7% 4.2% 4.4% Montana 11.6% 3.1% 3.6% Nebraska -3.1% 13.9% 14.0% 5.5% Nevada 13.0% 8.9% 8.3% 5.3% 5.9% New Hampsh. 3.9% New Jersey 1.5% 5.4% New Mexico 6.9% 8.5% 11.4% 8.2% New York -26.4% -2.8% 1.6% -19.9% -4.9% US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

NC to WY factors STATE rural restricted rural unrestricted urban restricted urban unrestricted all rural all urban total North Carolina 8.6% 7.2% 9.4% 7.9% 7.5% 8.4% 8.1% North Dakota -4.5% -15.2% 7.6% 9.6% -12.9% 9.3% -7.3% Ohio 6.4% 3.8% 5.5% 5.4% 4.6% 5.2% Oklahoma 9.5% 3.2% 6.6% -1.2% 4.7% 1.2% 2.8% Oregon 12.0% 6.7% 7.3% 3.7% 4.8% 6.1% Pennsylvania -2.7% -5.2% 10.5% 2.0% -4.3% 1.5% Rhode Island 27.8% -9.1% 8.9% -0.8% 3.3% South Carolina 12.3% 11.0% 9.7% South Dakota 27.5% -7.1% 1.1% 2.6% 3.1% Tennessee 4.4% -6.8% 13.6% 10.4% -3.3% 11.5% 6.3% Texas 14.7% 1.8% 14.5% 14.0% 14.2% 11.6% Utah 13.4% 13.5% 13.1% 15.1% 14.4% 14.1% Vermont 10.2% 4.2% -0.5% 2.2% Virginia 0.4% -7.5% 21.4% -4.9% 9.8% 4.3% Washington 8.8% 5.6% 6.0% 3.4% 6.9% 5.1% West Virginia -17.6% -8.3% 20.3% 20.4% -10.7% Wisconsin 13.0% 1.9% 7.7% 4.1% Wyoming 0.5% -2.5% -0.2% -1.4% -1.5% US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Decision Point What level of factors to use? Pros/cons: State+road type State+urban, State+rural State overall State+restricted, State+unrestricted (not shown) Pros/cons: Using one factor per state is simpler for downstream computations of VPOP and for hoteling hours based on VMT [and for understanding how VMT was adjusted] Using urban/rural factors allows for differences between urban and rural areas Using the same factor for all road types does not characterize differences between the road types US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

2014NEIv2 Coming Soon Data for 2014NEIv2 has been computed and should be posted with documentation by the end of January Seeded CDBs for emission factor mode modeling For representative counties only Includes small numbers in key fields so emission factors are generated for all potential source and road types Age distributions averaged across represented counties Unseeded CDBs for inventory mode modeling For all counties Includes county-specific activity data (including holes where they exist) Activity data in SMOKE format (VPOP, VMT, hoteling) Scripts to put activity into and get it out of CDBs Other files updated such as those listed in 2014v1 TSD US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Modeling Platform for 2014v2 Package of scripts and ancillary data to run SMOKE-MOVES including rep. county and fuel mappings is currently available (courtesy UNC) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1- UHPzfNS46fw1fjx0rOqzbC24s4-qoKr 2014 and 2015 emission factors are included 2016 will be added mid-February, including emissions for 14, 15, 16 in SMOKE Flat file format US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group

Next Steps Review representative counties for potential changes Review 2016 data for issues, once it has been provided Review issues brought up to the workgroup Distribution of hoteling hours as compared to known truck stops Best practices for developing heavy-duty VMT and VPOP E.g., checks of VMT/vehicle Best practices for using IHS data for splitting VMT and VPOP Best source of age distributions for 2016 – especially for heavy-duty vehicles Review workgroup charge here: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/12UNpx Nr8GlRDZmY3AKdEgm62qRy-vHCn US EPA OAQPS, Emission Inventory and Analysis Group