Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Novel Mutations on EGFR Leu792 Potentially Correlate to Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib in Advanced NSCLC  Kai Chen, MD, Fei Zhou, MD, Wenxiang Shen,
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 151, Issue 2, Pages e6 (August 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selection by T7 RNA Polymerase
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Crystal Structure of the TAO2 Kinase Domain
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (February 2019)
Nucleotide Effects on the Structure and Dynamics of Actin
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Thomas Kampourakis, Yin-Biao Sun, Malcolm Irving  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 959-967 (December 2015) Defects in DNA Repair Genes Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer  Elizabeth R. Plimack, Roland L. Dunbrack, Timothy A. Brennan, Mark D. Andrake, Yan Zhou, Ilya G. Serebriiskii, Michael Slifker, Katherine Alpaugh, Essel Dulaimi, Norma Palma, Jean Hoffman-Censits, Marijo Bilusic, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Rosalia Viterbo, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Costas D. Lallas, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Roman Yelensky, David J. McConkey, Vincent A. Miller, Erica A. Golemis, Eric A. Ross  European Urology  Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 959-967 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009 Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Distribution of alteration in samples by alteration type and responder status for the (A) AMVAC and (B) DDGC data sets. For each panel, the top graph indicates the alteration counts per sample. Somatic mutations in all sequenced genes were taken into account. Samples were subdivided into nonresponders (left section of the graph) and responders (right section) and sorted by the total number of all alterations in descending order. For each panel, the right-hand graph provides alteration counts per gene. For each panel, the main field indicates the presence of the mutation in a given sample in a given gene. Only the most deleterious mutation in the indicated gene is shown for cases in which two or more mutations were identified in the same patient. The type of mutation is color-coded as shown by the legend. MIBC=muscle-invasive bladder cancer. European Urology 2015 68, 959-967DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Distribution of alteration in samples by alteration type and responder status for the (A) AMVAC and (B) DDGC data sets. For each panel, the top graph indicates the alteration counts per sample. Somatic mutations in all sequenced genes were taken into account. Samples were subdivided into nonresponders (left section of the graph) and responders (right section) and sorted by the total number of all alterations in descending order. For each panel, the right-hand graph provides alteration counts per gene. For each panel, the main field indicates the presence of the mutation in a given sample in a given gene. Only the most deleterious mutation in the indicated gene is shown for cases in which two or more mutations were identified in the same patient. The type of mutation is color-coded as shown by the legend. MIBC=muscle-invasive bladder cancer. European Urology 2015 68, 959-967DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by ATM/RB1/FANCC mutation status for the AMVAC discovery and DDGC validation sets. Alteration in any one of ATM/RB1/FANCC predicts better PFS (p=0.0085) and OS (p=0.007) in the AMVAC discovery set, with a trend towards significance for OS (p=0.0545) in the DDGC validation set. wt=wild type; mut=mutation; PTs=patients. European Urology 2015 68, 959-967DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 ATM and RB protein domains and structures annotated with alterations. (A) RB domains and variants. The positions of RB missense variants and truncations are mapped with respect to known domains. The domains of RB are denoted along with their sequence ranges (except Rb-C, which corresponds to residues 829–872). RbN A and RbN B denote the A and B N-terminal domains. Pocket A and Pocket B denote the two pocket domains of RB. Rb-C is the C-terminal conserved motif. Truncations are marked with arrows. Red triangles denote missense mutations in responders, while green triangles denote missense mutations in nonresponders. Mutations predicted to be deleterious are marked with a black border around the triangles; those predicted to be neutral do not have a border. Mutations found in the same patient are connected with thin red lines. TCGA mutations associated with bladder cancer are denoted below the protein domain diagram with blue triangles. (B) ATM domains and variants. The positions of ATM missense variants and truncations are mapped with respect to known domains. (C) Predicted structure of ATM. The FAT (light green), PI-3/PI-4 kinase (light blue), and FATc (orange helix in the background) domains in a predicted structure of ATM are shown in ribbon representation. The wild-type residues found where missense variants were determined in this study are shown with red spheres. The magenta spheres represent a PI-3 kinase inhibitor molecule and thus mark the active site of the kinase domain.(D) Structure of RB1. RB-C domain bound to transcription factor Dp-1 and transcription factor E2F1 (Protein Data Bank entry 2AZE). The RB-C domain is shown in orange, Dp-1 in green, and E2F1 in cyan. The wild-type residue for mutation S862G is shown in red spheres; it forms a side- chain/side-chain hydrogen bond with E864 of RB, shown in orange spheres. It forms backbone hydrogen bonds with C274 of Dp-1 (not shown). European Urology 2015 68, 959-967DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions