Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular testing for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis San Francisco Department of Public Health Laboratory.
Advertisements

Global Consultation on the Implementation of the Xpert MTB/RIF system for rapid diagnosis of TB and MDR-TB M. Akhalaia, MD, Microbiologist, Reference.
TB in Tennessee The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Jason Cummins, MPH April 30, 2014.
MDCH STATE LABORATORY TUBERCULOSIS TESTING Specimens/Tests/Reports
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Tuberculosis
Standards for Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Professor Brian I. Duerden Inspector of Microbiology and Infection Control, Department of Health.
Module 3: Drug-Resistant TB. Learning Objectives Describe how drug resistance emerges Explain the difference between primary and secondary resistance.
ISDH Lab TB Testing Update Lixia Liu PhD MP(ASCP) September 16, 2010.
PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS
West Virginia Office of Laboratory Services Nicole Haddox, B.S. Microbiology- Tuberculosis Unit 1.
Introduction to Tuberculosis
Diagnosis of TB.
MAC PCR at WSLH Julie Tans-Kersten, MS, BS-MT (ASCP)
Allen Kraut, MD, FRCPC Medical Director, Occupational Health WRHA
 Pulmonary Tuberculosis BY: MOHAMED HUSSEIN. Cause  Caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis)  Gram (+) rod (bacilli). Acid-fast  Pulmonary.
Part 2 Performing drug susceptibility testing on solid media Module 10 1.
Comparison of Molecular and Conventional Methods for Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the United States, 2009 to 2011 Mitchell A. Yakrus,
British Society for Microbial Technology The laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis 25 years of progress D A Mitchison St George’s, University of London.
WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE 1 WSLH: Laboratory Update Tuberculosis Summit Verona, WI April 24, 2014 Julie Tans-Kersten, MS, BS-MT (ASCP) Tuberculosis.
CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC TB LABORATORY Alexander Sloutsky, Director University of Massachusetts Supranational Reference TB Laboratory Boston, MA.
TB 101 Part II Brenda Mayes, R. N. March TREATMENT TB DISEASE MDR XDR LATENT TB INFECTION.
Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE Case Study Youngmi Kim, MS, ASCP(M) Senior Microbiologist, Wisconsin State.
WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE 1 State Lab Perspective Julie Tans-Kersten, MS, BS-MT (ASCP) Tuberculosis Laboratory Program Coordinator Wisconsin.
Tuberculosis: A disease caused by tiny germs that enter in lungs when someone breath them in. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a rod shaped, non motile,
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000 Vol. 161, pp
Screening for TB.
CDC Guidelines for Use of QuantiFERON ® -TB Gold Test Philip LoBue, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Tuberculosis Elimination.
TB Methodologies Dr. John G. Magee Regional Reference Centre for Mycobacteriology Health Protection Agency Regional Laboratory, Newcastle upon Tyne.
3 Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Tuberculosis Disease.
Molecular diagnosis of drug resistant tuberculosis by a DNA array
Challenge of Diagnosing Smear-Negative TB Department of Infectious Diseases.
By: Kristen Sieck and Scott Senftner 3rd Period Health Class
By: Mpho Kontle and Topo Moses. Introduction & Etiology Multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is defined as tuberculosis that is resistant to at.
Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis By Dr. Faten Aly Shoukry, Ph D Consultant & Head of Microbiology Department, Abbassia Chest Hospital.
Mycobacteria İ. Çağatay Acuner M.D., Clinical Microbiologist, Associate Professor Department of Microbiology Faculty of Medicine, Yeditepe University,
Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
What’s New With Your Maryland State Lab. Richard Oatis Supervisor, Mycobacteriology State of Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Labs Administration.
Bacteriophage based test for the rapid detection & Antibiotic sensitivity test of TB Viro102: Bacteriophages & Phage Therapy 3 Credit hours NUST Centre.
Treatment Regimens for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Caused by Drug- Susceptible Organisms Initial PhaseContinuation Phase RegimenDrugs Interval and Doses (Minimal.
Case Discussion 2 - TB IN CHILDREN by Dr. Jeyaseelan P. Nachiappan & Dr. Suryati Adnan 1 Picture of CPG Cover.
TB – LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS by Dr. Zubaidah Abdul Wahab Datin Dr. Ganeswrie Raj 1.
TB: The Elispot In The Room Dr Jessica Potter TB Research Registrar Barts Health NHS Trust.
US TB Treatment Guidelines and DOT
Tuberculosis in children
Tuberculosis (TB) PHCL 442 Lab Discussion 4 Raniah Al-Jaizani M.Sc.
Tuberculosis Part 2.
TB diagnostic tests--history
Infant born with mother Tuberculosis
This is an archived document.
PROF.HANAN HABIB DEPRTMENT OF PATHOLOGY,MICROBIOLOGY UNIT KSU
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Tuberculosis
Laboratory ‘Network’ Update New York State Department of Health
Epidemiology of pulmonary tuberculosis
Time to update guidelines on screening for latent tuberculosis infection in dermatologic patients being treated with tumor necrosis factor-alfa inhibitors 
2017 World TB Day Jessica Gentry Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisor
CDC Guidelines for Use of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Test
Sputum Culture بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
Further explorations of surveillance data: case detection (all cases vs. bacteriologically confirmed, All strategies) Good afternoon. I will give a brief.
Time to update guidelines on screening for latent tuberculosis infection in dermatologic patients being treated with tumor necrosis factor-alfa inhibitors 
Module 9 Recording and reporting culture results
Tb: Screening & Diagnosis (1)
Tuberculosis in children BY MBBSPPT.COM
Deciphering TB Lab Reports
Tuberculosis Control Program
DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS
Laura Lane, Epidemiologist
Jessica Gentry Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisor
Uses of Genotyping.
Case of Medical Tourism
Presentation transcript:

Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis The ABC’s of AFB’s Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis Gary Budnick Connecticut Department of Public Health Mycobacteriology Laboratory

Overview Laboratory TAT Goals Case Study Contact Investigation NAAT Specimen Collection Testing Contact Investigation Genotyping IGRA’s NAAT The main topics of the presentation will include:

TAT Goals for the TB Laboratory Objective Goal Delivery of specimens to the laboratory ≤ 24 hrs of collection AFB smear results reported to submitter ≤ 24 hrs of specimen receipt in lab Identify growth as AFB ASAP ≤14 days of specimen collection Isolates identified as MTB ASAP ≤21 days of specimen collection DST results ASAP ≤28 days of specimen collection NAA results on specimens ultimately TB culture (+) ≤48 hrs of specimen receipt in lab

(details changed for presentation purposes) Case Study (details changed for presentation purposes) June 2006: Teenager immigrates to U.S. November 2009: started cough March 2010: presented to ED w/cough Chest X-ray: Cavity in Left Upper Lobe Patient transferred to another hospital CT Scan- Bilateral Cavities Specimens to commercial lab Smears AFB(+)

Sputums are Submitted to the State PH Lab for Smear and Culture Case Study Sputums are Submitted to the State PH Lab for Smear and Culture Collected from 4/4/10 to 8/1/10 Seventeen sputums are collected until the smear & culture are negative

Sputum Specimen Collection The accuracy of laboratory testing is directly related to the quality of the specimen Proper collection technique prevents contamination of specimen Any contaminants (other AFB & bacteria) introduced into the sputum decreases the chances of culturing out the TB Cough directly into tube Use a sterile, single-use container (50-ml centrifuge tube) Patient identifier on tube Lab will not test an unlabeled specimen

Sputum Specimen Collection Cough deeply to produce a lower respiratory specimen 3 consecutive sputums collected in 8-24h intervals, one should be early morning (before eating, drinking or smoking) Do not pool specimens A good specimen should be approximately 3–5 ml, usually thick and mucoid. Clear saliva or nasal discharge is not suitable as a TB specimen

Package and Transport to Lab Packaging as per DOT/USPS regulations Complete & accurate test requisition Transport to lab ASAP If transport is delayed for more than one hour, refrigerate specimen Keep cold (do not freeze) during transport CDC Goal: specimens received at laboratory within 24 hours of collection

New England Regional Data Rapid Delivery of Specimens to Laboratory Goal= 100% of Specimens Received within 24 hours of Collection Issues Affecting TAT Method and Frequency of Transport Coordination of specimen collection and delivery Batching Cost Mean (2009) % within 1-day 2-days 3-days New England 49.2 70.4 83.2 National 42.3 60.3 75.6 % difference +6.9 +10.1 +7.6 9

Cultures and Clinical Specimens State PH Labs Receive Cultures and Clinical Specimens for Testing Referred Cultures AFB (+) Broths & Agar Clinical Specimens Pulmonary most common CTDPH (2009) Sputum, Bronch Lavage, Bronch Wash & Brushes = 65.7%

Referred Cultures BactiT/ALERT* SEPTI-CHECK LJ Agar Slant 7H10 Agar Slant BACTEC 460* SEPTI-CHECK Broth *Automated Method A variety of media, including automated systems are available for culturing for TB

Processing and Culturing of Clinical Specimens Digestion (NALC) Decontamination (NaOH) is lethal to all bacteria, AFB more resistant Prepare & Stain Smears Inoculate Broth & Agar Cultures: Lowenstein-Jensen 7H10/7H11 MGIT Broth

Acid-Fast Staining of Clinical Specimens Reporting Method (ATS) Number of AFB in 1x2” smear Report No AFB found 1-2 in entire smear Repeat 3-9 in entire smear Rare  10 in entire smear Few  1 per 1000 x field Numerous Clinical smears are read and reported daily. Auramine-Rhodamine Fluorescent Staining Smears Read Daily CDC Goal : Submitter receives AFB smear results within 24 h of receipt of specimen in lab

Case Smear History 4/4/10 6/12/10 4/11/10 6/18/10 4/21/10 6/27/10 Patient hospitalized for approximately 2 weeks. Discharged to home isolation while smear positive Date Collected Smear Result 4/4/10 (+) Numerous 6/12/10 (+) Rare 4/11/10 6/18/10 Negative 4/21/10 6/27/10 5/1/10 (+) Few 7/8/10 5/8/10 7/15/10 5/15/10 7/22/10 5/22/10 7/28/10 6/5/10 8/1/10

Acid-Fast Staining: Clinical Specimens Lab will report the “number” of AFB on AFB positive smears (rare, few, etc) You may see other smear reporting systems (e.g.CDC) 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+. Fluorochrome stain most sensitive Three AFB / smear is considered positive Non-Fluorochrome Stains Kinyoun , Zieihl-Neelson,

What is an AFB? Acid-Fast Bacilli The bacilli stays “red” even after exposure to acid during staining TB & all Mycobacteria Other non-Mycobacteria e.g Nocardia

A-R (Fluorochrome) Smear Sputum Collected 4/4/10 Date Test Result 4/4/10 A-R (Fluorochrome) Smear Positive (Numerous)

Culture (grow the AFB) in Clinical Specimens MGIT: Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube Automated system monitors growth LJ slants: 8 weeks @ 36 deg. C. w/CO2

Culture Progress (sputum collected 4/4/10) 4/10/10: Broth culture positive (AFB confirmed by smear) Submitter was notified of positive culture by phone and fax same day. Report: “Culture Positive for Acid-fast Bacilli” Not necessarily M. tuberculosis

A-R (Fluorochrome) Smear Sputum Collected 4/4/10 Date Test Result 4/4/10 A-R (Fluorochrome) Smear Positive (Numerous) 4/10/10 MGIT Broth Culture Positive for AFB

Is the Culture TB or Not TB? Identification Tests Gen-Probe Accuprobe primary ID method used by all NE PHLs HPLC (Connecticut) AFB have unique mycolic acids used to ID them Biochemical Testing (all NE states) Molecular (CDC Reference lab) DNA sequencing

Amplified and Non-Amplified What is a “Probe” Test? There are basically two kinds of “probe” tests depending on what you are testing Amplified and Non-Amplified

Testing AFB (+) Cultures? use Non-Amplified tests Gen-Probe Accuprobe MTbc, Mac, Mka, Mgo kits Tests for the presence of mycobacteria genetic “fingerprint” Sensitivity is based on how much AFB is in the culture Have to wait for growth Culture need not be pure

Testing Sputums Directly? Use an Amplified Test “Amplified” means copies of the TB are made which increases sensitivity MTD, NAA, NAAT, PCR MTD: MTbc Tests for genetic material (DNA or RNA) Patient should not have been treated For initial diagnosis, not to follow treatment Results within 24-48 h of specimen receipt

CDC Goal: Cultures identified within 21 days of specimen collection Identification 4/4/10: First sputum collected and received at the lab 4/10/10: Culture: Positive for M. tuberculosis complex by Gen-Probe Accuprobe TAT= 6 days CDC Goal: Cultures identified within 21 days of specimen collection

What is M. tuberculosis complex A group of genetically related Mycobacteria M. tuberculosis – most commonly identified M. bovis - animals & humans M. bovis BCG - vaccine, bladder cancer therapy M. africanum - West Africa M. canetti - Africa, mode of transmission unknown M. microti – TB in voles Lab can confirm as M. tuberculosis if needed

Sputum Collected 4/4/10 Date Test Result 4/4/10 A-R (Fluorchrome) Smear Positive (Numerous) 4/10/10 MGIT Broth Culture Positive for AFB Gen-Probe Accuprobe MTBC Positive for MTB complex

Any Questions So Far?

Goal: MTB DST results ≤ 28 days of specimen collection Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) Goal: MTB DST results ≤ 28 days of specimen collection BACTEC MGIT 960 Method (Most NE, VT uses VersaTREK) Set up first (ASAP after TB is identified) Rapid Broth Method (4-14 days) SIRE & PZA “Confirmatory” Testing Set up if any resistance by MGIT 960 Secondary drugs also if Rif or any 2 drugs Resistance 21 Days Incubation Agar Proportion Method “Gold standard”

Anti-tuberculous Drugs BACTEC MGIT 960 Primary (First Line) Anti-tuberculous Drugs Rapid Method (4-14 days) TB isolate is inoculated to drug-free and drug-containing tubes and incubated. The system monitors for growth and the instrument software determines when test is complete

Concentration (ug/ml) BACTEC MGIT 960 Drugs Drug Concentration (ug/ml) Streptomycin 1.0 Isoniazid 0.1 Rifampin Ethambutol 5.0 Pyrazinamide 100

Goal: MTB DST results ≤ 28 days of specimen collection BACTEC MGIT DST Results Completed 4/29/10 Isoniazid (INH) - Resistant Rifampin (RIF) - Resistant Steptomycin (STR) - Susceptible Ethambutol (ETH) - Susceptible Pyrazinamide (PZA) - Susceptible = Multidrug-Resistant TB TAT=25 days Goal: MTB DST results ≤ 28 days of specimen collection

What is Multidrug-Resistant TB? A TB Isolate Resistant to Isoniazid and Rifampin

Requires 21 days incubation Agar Plate Method for primary confirmation and second line anti-tuberculous Drugs “Gold Standard” method Compare growth on drug and drug-free quadrants Requires 21 days incubation

Concentration (g / ml) Concentration (g/ml) p-Aminosalicylic Acid Agar Plate Method (7H10) Primary and Secondary Drugs Primary Drug Concentration (g / ml) Secondary Concentration (g/ml)   Isoniazid 0.2 Amikacin (Inj) 6.0 1.0 Ciprofloxacin (Flu) 2.0 Rifampin Ethambutol 10 5.0 Streptomycin Ethionamide Kanamycin (Inj) p-Aminosalicylic Acid Ofloxacin (Flu) Capreomycin (Inj) Rifabutin

4/18/10-Isolate Sent to CDC for MDDR Testing 4/17/10- MGIT In Progress Report: Resistance Detected 4/18/10-Isolate Sent to CDC for MDDR Testing Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance Quick way to get a preliminary DST result CDC Program Looks at the the TB genes that cause resistance CDC Requirements High risk of resistance or known Rif-R or high profile case Mixed or Non-viable (won’t grow) cultures Limitations They don’t know all the genes that cause resistance in TB

CDC MDDR Results Received 4/21/10 =Multidrug-Resistant TB rpoB Mutation Found = Rifampin Resistant inhA - No Mutation katG -Mutation found= Isoniazid Resistant gyrA (fluoroquinolone ) - No Mutation Rrs (Amikacin) - No Mutation Eis (Kanamycin - No Mutation Tlya (Capreomycin) - No Mutation

Sputum Collected 4/4/10 Date Test Result 4/4/10 A-R (Fluorchrome)Smear Positive (Numerous) 4/10/10 MGIT Broth Culture Positive for AFB Gen-Probe Accuprobe MTBC Positive for MTB complex 4/21/10 CDC MDDR Inh, Rif (Res) 4/29/10 BACTEC 960 DST Inh (0.1), Rif (1.0) Resistant Str (1.0), Eth (5.0), PZA Sus 5/13/10 Agar Proportion 1st & 2nd line Inh (0.2, 1.0, 5.0) Resistant Rif (1.0) Resistant Eth (5.0) Resistant Strep (10.0) Resistant Rifabutin (2.0) Resistant Ethionamide (10.0) Resistant Others Susceptible

Why do the MGIT and APM DST Results Sometimes Disagree? Bacterial population (isolate vs. subculture) Differential growth rates Different inoculation amounts (size, clumps) Different methods or media Cross-contamination Transcription, labeling errors “Human error / lab error” Beverly Metchock, DrPH, D(ABMM) Mycobacteriology Laboratory Branch CDC DTBE

Contact Investigation-Genotyping MTbc isolates forwarded to Michigan PHL Goal: send all MTbc case isolates Molecular fingerprinting patterns Compare patterns in state & nationally Uses: Detect outbreaks earlier Discover unsuspected relationships between cases Identify false positives TB-GIMS (web-based tool)

Contact Investigation-IGRA’s Mother had TB when first immigrated Father treated for LTBI as contact to wife Patient was oldest of 5 children, including 3 week old infant, when diagnosed Quantiferon Testing: 2/4 siblings positive (infant negative)

Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA’s) Measures interferon gamma (INF-γ) released by WBC’s. Approved to measure immune response for both LTBI and TB infection resulting in active disease FDA approved tests: QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) 2005 Quantiferon-Gold (In-Tube) (QFT-GIT) 2007 T-SPOT.TB (T-Spot) 2008 QFT-GIT: Connecticut & Massachusetts PHL

QuantiFERON Gold (In-Tube) Best practices to optimize test results Collection & Handling Will Affect Results Tubes at room temperature Collect 1 ml (line on tube) Vigorous shaking for 10 seconds Store tubes upright Do not refrigerate or freeze during storage or transport Blood tubes must be incubated within 16 hours www.cellestis.com

Updated Guidelines for Using Interferon Gamma Release Assays to Detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection-United States, 2010. MMWR June 25, 2010/59(RR05); 1-25 Convened an expert consultation in 2009 45

Interferon Gamma Release Assays Recommendations Report both qualitative and quantitative results May use an IGRA in place of (but not in addition to) a TST in all situations in which CDC recommends a TST IGRA Preferred / TST acceptable Low rates of return to have TST read Received BCG vaccine or cancer therapy TST Preferred / IGRA acceptable Children aged <5 y

Nucleic Acid Amplification (NAA) Test Make copies of TB DNA (if present) Specimen type depends on the method Does not distinguish live or dead AFB Sensitivity: how frequently is NAA(+) when TB is in the specimen >95% for smear (+) TB patients 55-75% of smear (-) / culture (+) patients Performance improves with increased clinical suspicion of TB

Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) FDA-approved for smear (+) & smear (-) Not for test of cure or treatment monitoring Pulmonary Only None or <7d on drug therapy Approx. $60 / test cost (labor & reagents) NE PHL Availability In-House: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont NH sends to Maine, RI sends to MA

Updated Guidelines for the Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis MMWR January 16, 2009/58 (1); 7-10 Convened an expert consultation in 2009

Acknowledgements Toby Bennett, RI Dept. of Health Lab Mark Lobato, M.D., CDC/ DTBE Lynn Sosa, M.D., Conn. Dept. of Public Health Peggy Sweeney, New Hampshire Public Health Lab France Tyrrell, CDC/DTBE/MLB

Thank You