Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InVEST Sediment Retention Model Estimate the amount of watershet erosion and sedimentation and its economic impact on hydropower production and water quality.
Advertisements

1 Guadalupe Watershed Model Year 1 Progress Report SPLWG Meeting May 14 th 2008 John Oram, Lester McKee, Michelle Lent Item #3b.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
53rd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ARIZONA-NEVADA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON, AZ APRIL 4, rd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ARIZONA-NEVADA ACADEMY.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Estimating Pollutant Loads Caroni River Bolivar, Venezuela Global Applications of GIS Technology Lee Sherman.
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
San Diego’s Watershed and and Examination of Land Cover in Relation to Pollution Tamera Ashcraft 30 November 2000.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Conclusion BACKGROUND Since the basis of this analysis is not based on the skill of the offender, but rather, an inherent dependence on environmental and.
In the City of Austin Bryan Barnett. Overview Atrophic Effects on the Hydrologic Cycle Potential Effects on the Surface Excessive Run-off High transport.
A GIS approach to understanding groundwater – surface water interactions in the Logan River and Red Butte Creek, Utah Trinity Stout CEE 6440.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
GIS as a tool to help determine the effects of aquatic systems polluted with nutrients Term Project Phillip Udom December 1, 2015 CEE 6440 – GIS in Water.
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Application of TOPMODEL GIS for Bear River Watershed
David Stevens, Nancy Mesner, Terry Glover, Arthur Caplan
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Christian Michaelson Joe Anderson
Indices of Road Erosion Bear Valley Watershed, Idaho
Innovation Through GIS
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
Precipitation, Streamflow and a Look at Little Bear River Contaminants
Dan Child CEE 5440/6440 Utah State University Fall 2003
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
Labyrinth Weir Flow Analysis & Maps
Cristina Nelson, Term Project, CEE 6440, Fall 2007
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Best Management Practices Implemented in Lower Bear River
Terrain Analysis for Water Quality Modeling
Lecture 22: Using ArcToolbox Tools in Python
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
Assignment #8 - Project Flow Chart Jack Melcher UEP-232
Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS for Water Resources Cee 6440
Comparison of Streamflow and Precipitation in the Provo River Watershed CEE 6440 By: Steven McKee.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
Hydrologic Analysis of the Hyrum Reservoir watershed
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM)
Upper Bear River Watershed Analysis using Topmodel
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Analysis of the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the Logan River Watershed Paul Ackerson CEE 6440.
Hyrum Reservoir and how it applies to Flood Control by Nathan Wright
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Urbanization and the Effect on Watershed Hydrology
CEE 6440 GIS in WATER RESOURCES
WATER RESEARCH OF PINEVIEW RESERVOIR
Surface Water Streams, rivers, ponds, lakes and wetlands.
% Riparian Natural Cover
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho Ruba Mohamed GIS in Water Resources CEE 6440 11/23/2010

Why we care ? Water quality affects: Fish and aquatic organisms Aesthetics

Study Purpose Is to use ArcGIS to estimate the phosphorous load on the streams using the landuse data and loading rates from literature The streams are: Bear River, UT, ID and WY Logan River, UT and ID Spring Creek, UT Little Bear River, UT

How I used ArcGIS!

Selection of Streams, Watersheds, and flow monitoring points Selection of Streams, Watersheds, and flow monitoring points. Data are obtained from USGS (2010) Displaying Land use data obtained from USGS (2010) Create subwatershed for Little Bear River and Logan River using the TauDEM command line script from the USU TauDEM webpage and the Command prompt, DEM data obtained from USGS (2010)

Streams, Watersheds and Flow Monitoring Stations Monitoring stations feature class is created by exporting MS Excel file and displaying xy data - Flow Data Source: NHDPlus 2010, region 16 Stream Mean Annual Flow (cfs) Logan River above state dam, UT 84.386 Spring Creek at 600 S nr Logan, UT 27.108 Little Bear River at Benson marina, UT 117.06 Bear River below Oneida reservoir, ID 219.688

Landuse Data Data Management tools Raster Raster Dataset Mosaic Spatial analyst tools Extraction Extract by Mask

TauDEM Application - Pit removal (fel) - Flow direction using the D8 method (P) - D8 slope (sd8) - Contributing area (ad8o) - Longest flow path (plen), flow paths length (tlen) and network order (gord) - Stream network skeleton (ss) - Stream delineation (ssa) - Stream network (w) (P) (ad80) (ssa) (fel) (sd8) (tlen) (w)

Results

Subwatersheds Delineation

Landuse Percentage Logan River Bear River Little Bear River

Total Phosphorous Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Summary of the landuse percentage Landuse Logan River Bear River Little Bear Cropland and pasture < 3% 20% 22% Shrub-brushed rangeland ≈ 33% ≈ 50% ≈ 40% Forest land ≈ 60% ≈ 20% Urban, residential, industrial, and commercial < 1% Literature phosphorous loading rate Land Use Total Phosphorous Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Industrial 4.77 Transportation, communications and services 2.5 Commercial and Services 2.05 Residential 1.97 Cropland and pasture 0.94 Herbaceous Rangeland 0.22 Shrub-brushland rangeland Forest land 0.08 Lakes and reservoirs

Conclusions Little Bear River is subjected to the highest load of phosphorous because it has the highest percent of cropland and pastures. Logan River is healthy because 60% of its landuse is forest and less than 2% cropland and pasture. Bear River is expected to receive a relatively high load of phosphorous downstream.

Future Work Delineate the Spring Creek subwatershed and apply the same approach to estimate the load of phosphorous. Calculating the area of each landuse and use it to find the phosphorous concentration. Appling the same study with other nutrients i.e. nitrogen and organic carbon

Questions?