Empagliflozin Empagliflozin is a highly selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) in the kidney Glucose reduction occurs by reducing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Advertisements

The management of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease in clinical practice.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
© Lloyd’s Regional Watch Content Guide CLICK ANY BOX AMERICAS IMEA EUROPE ASIA PACIFIC.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Introduction Bernard Zinman CM, MD, FRCP, FACP Director, Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto 1.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
André Lamy Population Health Research Institute Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton, CANADA on behalf of the CORONARY Investigators Disclosures.
CARU The HY pertension in the V ery E lderly T rial – latest data Stephen Jackson Professor of Clinical Gerontology King’s Health Partners.
S. Goto1, J. Zhu2, L. Lisheng2, BH. Oh3, D. Wojdyla4, M. Hanna5, J. Horowitz6, L. Wallentin7, D. Xavier8, JH. Alexander4 (1) Tokai University School of.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Richard Ceska, President of Cardionale, on behalf of IAS Welcome to PRAGUE Welcome to CARDIONALE.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Tailoring Intervention – Effectively Targeting the High-risk Population Cardiovascular Event Reduction in the Higher-Risk Primary Prevention Population.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
SS-1 Candesartan Support Slides. SS-2 Baseline Beta-Blocker Charm Added β-blocker Of patients on β-blockers Mean daily dose of β-blocker CandesartanPlacebo.
Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Safety. 2 Potential CV protection pathways of SGLT2i Diab Vasc Dis Res Mar;12(2):
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated.
R1. 이정미 / prof. 이상열. INTRODUCTION Type 2 diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease The presence of both type 2 diabetes and.
Heart Failure Events and All-cause Death in New Users of SGLT-2 inhibitors vs other glucose-lowering drugs - consistent risk reduction across patient groups.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
The SPRINT Research Group
Title slide.
Michael J. Koren, MD, Michael H. Davidson, MD, Daniel J
Implications for practice and conclusions
Trial profile SAS denotes the Simvastatin in Aortic Stenosis Study
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Career choice for Chinese medical graduate: Safety Physician
CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump
Neal B, et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:403–411
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
New Insights from EXSCEL
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Electrification Products
Empagliflozin (Jardiance®)
Locations where Black Panther was released in the theaters in 2018.
Citi Virtual Card Accounts – Continued Global Expansion
with type 2 diabetes without heart failure?
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Cardiovascular outcomes
Cardiovascular (CV) Safety and Severe Hypoglycemia Benefit of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 in Older Patients (≥65 years) with Type 2 Diabetes.
on behalf of the LEADER Trial Steering Committee and Investigators
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors work by blocking the reabsorption of filtered glucose in the kidneys. This leads to glucosuria and improved.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Diabetes and CV Risk Reduction: Cardiologists’ Perspectives on the Latest Outcomes Data.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
CV Risk Management in T2DM: What Did We Learn from ADA 2016?
A: Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to first LLA
August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at a Late-Breaking Trial Session of the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2004 held in.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
IBM's Geographical Structure and where IBM Global Financing has clients IBM Global Financing, the world's largest IT captive financier, has a total asset.
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects*
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
CANVAS programe subanalyses HR (95%CI): 0.65 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
Presenter Disclosure Information
Electrification business
Presentation transcript:

Empagliflozin Empagliflozin is a highly selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) in the kidney Glucose reduction occurs by reducing renal glucose reabsorption and thus increasing urinary glucose excretion In patients with type 2 diabetes, empagliflozin leads to1: Significant reductions in HbA1c Weight loss Reductions in blood pressure without increases in heart rate 1. Liakos A et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:984-93

Empagliflozin modulates several factors related to CV risk BP Arterial stiffness Other Albuminuria Uric acid Glucose Insulin Sympathetic nervous system activity ↑LDL-C ↑HDL-C Triglycerides Weight Visceral adiposity Oxidative stress Adapted from Inzucchi SE,Zinman, B, Wanner, C et al. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2015;12:90-100

EMPA-REG OUTCOME® Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled CV outcomes trial Objective To examine the long-term effects of empagliflozin versus placebo, in addition to standard of care, on CV morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and high risk of CV events CV, cardiovascular

Trial design John M Lachin, ScD Professor of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Statistics, The George Washington University, Rockville, USA

Disclosure Consultations Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck and Co., Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, AstraZeneca

Participating countries 590 sites in 42 countries Participating countries (42): Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Colombia Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia France Georgia Greece Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Israel Italy Japan Korea Malaysia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Singapore South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Taiwan Thailand Ukraine United Kingdom United States North America, Australia, New Zealand Latin America Asia Africa Europe

Randomised and treated Trial design Placebo (n=2333) Screening (n=11531) Randomised and treated (n=7020) Empagliflozin 10 mg (n=2345) Empagliflozin 25 mg (n=2342) Study medication was given in addition to standard of care Glucose-lowering therapy was to remain unchanged for first 12 weeks Treatment assignment double masked The trial was to continue until at least 691 patients experienced an adjudicated primary outcome event

Timeline September 15th 2010: First patient entered April 13th 2013: Last patient entered December 15th 2014: Closeout (final visits) started April 13th 2015: Last patient out Efforts were made to track outcomes and vital status for all patients, including those who discontinued trial medication

Patient disposition Placebo Empagliflozin 10 mg Empagliflozin 25 mg Intent-to-treat population 2333 (100) 2345 (100) 2342 (100) Discontinued study drug prematurely 683 (29.3) 555 (23.7) 542 (23.1) Completed study or died 2266 (97.1) 2264 (96.5) Vital status available 2316 (99.3) 2324 (99.1) 2327 (99.4) 6809 (97%) completed study or died 1780 (25%) discontinued study drug prematurely, more in placebo All but 214 (3%) completed study or died Vital status assessed in 99%

Key inclusion and exclusion criteria Key inclusion criteria Adults with type 2 diabetes BMI ≤45 kg/m2 HbA1c 7–10%* Established cardiovascular disease Prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, unstable angina or occlusive peripheral arterial disease Key exclusion criteria eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (MDRD) BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease *No glucose-lowering therapy for ≥12 weeks prior to randomisation or no change in dose for ≥12 weeks prior to randomisation or, in the case of insulin, unchanged by >10% compared to the dose at randomisation

Pre-specified primary and key secondary outcomes Primary outcome 3-point MACE: Time to first occurrence of CV death, non-fatal MI or non-fatal stroke Key secondary outcome 4-point MACE: Time to first occurrence of CV death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction; MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event

Further pre-specified outcomes CV death Non-fatal MI Non-fatal stroke Hospitalisation for heart failure All-cause mortality All CV and neurological events were adjudicated by independent, masked, clinical event committees CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction

Additional analyses Changes from baseline in: HbA1c Weight Waist circumference Systolic and diastolic blood pressure Heart rate LDL cholesterol HDL cholesterol Safety and tolerability Adverse events HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein

Statistical testing strategy for MACE Analysis compared empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg (pooled) versus placebo Hierarchy to be used: Test of non-inferiority for 3-point MACE Test of non-inferiority for 4-point MACE Test of superiority for 3-point MACE Test of superiority for 4-point MACE Each tested at =0.0249, allowing for 0.0001 penalty for inclusion of interim data in NDA to FDA Non-inferiority was concluded if two-sided upper bound of 95.02% CI was <1.3 Superiority was concluded if two-sided p≤0.0498 MACE; Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; NDA, New Drug Application; FDA, Food and Drug Administration

Statistical analysis Analyses of CV outcomes were based on a Cox proportional hazards model Patients who did not have an event were censored on the last day they were known to be free of the outcome Cumulative incidence functions were corrected for mortality as a competing risk (except for all-cause mortality) The primary analysis was conducted in patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug (intent-to-treat population) The CV outcome analyses were independently validated by statisticians at the University of Freiburg, Germany

Further pre-defined analyses of the primary outcome Secondary analyses: Comparisons of empagliflozin 10 mg versus placebo and empagliflozin 25 mg versus placebo Sensitivity analyses: To assess the robustness of the outcomes, we used three subsets of the data set (two on-treatment sets and one per-protocol set) Subgroup analyses based on baseline characteristics