Session 6: Three Star Approach”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Contract Management Planning
Advertisements

EFFECTIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA)
5. Monitoring and Analysis of TA Progress  Check on the process and progress of the technical assistance provided according to standards set and offer.
Head of Learning: Job description
Why? -Children have the right to water, sanitation and health. This right needs to be fulfilled in schools where children spend much of their day. -WASH.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Consistency of Assessment
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY PRACTICE STANDARDS
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Sultanate of Oman Oman Drinking Water Safety Plan.
EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)
+ Strengthening effective school health in Nepal Dr Lonim Prasai Dixit/Mr Madhukar Shrestha Coordinator/co coordinator School Health and Nutrition Network,
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
VPP Introduction Challenge for the Future of Safety Developed from VPP website information.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD Inter-regional Workshop on the Production of Gender Statistics 6 August 2007, New Delhi, India USER-PRODUCER GROUP.
Presented by Thomas. What is HR Department HR Departments are the entities organizations that organize people, report relationships, and work in a way.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
WHO IS MANAGER? People responsible for directing the efforts aimed at helping organizations achieve their goals. People responsible for directing the.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
SESSION 8: STRATEGIC PLANNING & GOALSSETTING District 3310 PETS 2010/11 Session 8: Strategic Planning and Goals Setting.
KENYA INSTITUTE OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
LGS – HR POLICY.  OVERALL POLICY STATEMENT  The most valued assets of the Service are the people who individually and collectively contribute to the.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
HAPPY SCHOOL Venue: Feathers Hotel Date: 2nd March, 2017
Policy Guidelines on Awards and Recognition for the K to 12 Basic Education Program DepEd Order No. 36 , s
BUGANDO MEDICAL CENTRE PRESENTATION ON OPRAS OVERVIEW
Three Star Approach for WASH in Schools In Afghanistan
Quality assurance in population and housing census SUDAN’s EXPERIANCE in QUALITY assurance of Censuses By salah El din. A . Magid OUR EXPERIANCE IN 5.
ISO/IEC
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICE DIVISION Resource Management & Mobilization
African Quality Rating Mechanism (AQRM)
Pietro Gennari FAO Chief Statistician co-Chair CCSA
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
CH5- SETTING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, IDENTIFYING STRATEGIES AND TACTICS
Closing the circle and Reviewing the plan
Second SDG Partnerships Webinar:
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
CLUB SERVICE PROJECTS By: PP Ronnie Tan RC of Belait PETS – 2009/10.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Session 2: “Enabling the Implementation”
Session 3: Steering Structures
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Standardization in the Beauty and Wellness Sector
Public Health Planning and Analysis
ENQA Agency Reviews – main changes from the old review process
Guidelines for Establishing State Motorcycle Safety Coalitions
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Bureau of Human Resource and Organizational Development
Induction Training Design
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Review of CSTL MER Framework
World’s Largest Educational Community
Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Statutory induction briefing
Presentation transcript:

Session 6: Three Star Approach” Orientation and Planning for The WinS Policy Implementation Department of Education Bureau of Learner Support Services 25 – 28 October 2016

Activity “Pinoy-Henyo” Each group will field in 2 members to perform the “Pinoy-Henyo” challenge Each group will be judged according to the following criteria: No. of Correct Answers 40 pts Teamwork 30 pts Creativity 30 pts Total of 100 pts

Activity “Paint me a Picture” The transmutation of the points to the number of stars garnered by each group will be based on this table: Number of stars to be given to the group Range Description 3 stars 90-100 Best 2 stars 79-89 Better 1 star 68-78 Good 0 star 57-67 Poor

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Situation 1 HAND WASHING ACTIVITY

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Time is UP!

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Situation 2 DISTRIBUTION OF HYGIENE KIT

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Time is UP!

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Situation 3 MEETING WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS ON SBM-WinS IMPLEMENTATION

Activity “Paint me a Picture” Time is UP!

Analysis How did you manage to perform the activity with your group? What went well? What went wrong? Do you think that the judging on each round was fair enough for every group? Why or why not?

Session Objectives Appreciate the Philippines WinS Program is an integrated mechanism for QA – Monitoring – Recognition Explain the process of TSA as a QA – Monitoring – Recognition Appreciate the utilization of the TSA mechanism

Discussion Points Three Star Approach as an integrated QA – Monitoring – Recognition System Process Rating scheme and Report Recognition

DepED Order No. 10, s. 2016 – Policy and Guidelines for the Comprehensive WinS Program stipulated that the Office through the School Health Division of the Bureau of Learner Support Services (BLSS) shall take the necessary strategies and actions for the overall execution of the WinS program. Alongside this responsibility is establishing a set of standards for incentives and awards to recognize outstanding program implementers It is in this context that the following guidelines and mechanisms are enumerated to provide guide and standards to the field in the implementation of the WinS Policy (DepED Order No. 10, s. 2016).

Three  Approach as an Integrated System The WinS Three-Star Approach is designed as an integrated system to ensure the quality WASH practices in Schools, thereby contributing largely to achieve sustainable improvements for “healthy schools” that support all children in their development.   It is considered a single approach to ensure: quality of WinS implementation, due diligence of monitoring for developmental reasons; and performance is recognized to further motivate continuous improvement.

Three  Approach as an Integrated System As a QA mechanism of a regular school program, all schools shall monitor their WinS implementation to ensure that the enablers for learning are in place and functional. As a Recognition system, the recognition puts premium to both the improvement efforts of the school community and on the results of the efforts themselves. As a Monitoring scheme, the integrity of data shall be given premium. Thus, a Validation of information is a pre-requisite for awarding of Recognition. The Monitoring reports of schools shall serve as basis for technical assistance of the Schools Division Office. These shall form part of the agenda for technical assistance and Schools’ Continuous Improvement Projects

Three Star Approach for WinS Implementation: STEPS For Effort / improvement: Citation of Appreciation Recognition for 3schools Seal of Excellence for 3 years Recognition SDO looks closely at 3schools Documents review Visits and observations Validation: School Level: Report to School Stakeholders SIP, AIP and APP Continuous Improvement Project (CI Project) Plan adjustment of the WinS Program Evidence for the SBM Assessment SDO Level: Technical Assistance Plan of the ESs for each school M&E Report of the SDO DEDP , AIP and APP Translating Results into Actions Self-Assessment: Check 5 crucial WinS indicators Complete the Monitoring Form Review the results Gather School WinS TWG Orient or review of the indicators and 3 steps Preparation:

Rating Scheme Special Note: Five (5) of the 24 indicators are crucial indicators for the WinS implementation / practice. Safe drinking water Gender-segregated toilets Group handwashing facility Group handwashing activities Access to sanitary pads

Rating Scheme 1. Determine the compliance to the Five (5) Basic Crucial Indicators. If the school failed to meet any of the five, then the school’s Over-all Rating will automatically register as 0 Star, or “Beginning” regardless of the ratings in the other indicators Identify the Star level/rating of each indicator and assign an equivalent point, where 1 Star = 1 point. Compute for the Over-all Rating using averaging – i.e. total points divided by total indicators Determine the Over-all WinS Implementation Level using the Scale provided

Scale Range Descriptor 0.0 – .74 0 Star = Beginning Implementation 0.0 – .74 0 Star = Beginning Implementation 0.75 – 1.74 1 Star = Developing Implementation Level 1.75 – 2.74 2 Star = Maturing Implementation Level 2.75 – 3.00 3 Star = Advance Implementation Level TSA School Report

Recognition a. Elevated the implementation to a higher level. For improving, the school will be given a Citation of Appreciation as signed by Schools Division Superintendent b. Reached the desired Advanced Level of WinS Implementation (3 – Star Level). For being able to fully observe national standards, the school will be given a Recognition Award duly signed by the DepED Regional Director c. Successfully maintained an Advanced Level of WinS Implementation (3 – Star Level) for 3 straight years, the school will cited for excellence and be given the Seal of Excellence issued by the CO as signed by the Director of the BLSS in behalf of the Secretary.

“Be not afraid to walk slow. Be afraid if you stand still. ” “Be not afraid to walk slow. Be afraid if you stand still.” -Chinese Proverb Let us not be discouraged with what we only have right now. At the end of the day, if we persevere to commit ourselves with this SBM-WinS Program, little by little we will get there. We will become the catalyst of change not only in our region, but also in the entire nation.

Thank you!