Introduction Data comes in many forms. Doctor / Patient: Conversations Test results Scans Vital statistics Area / Policy Maker: SIMD Community Profiling Tool ScotPho Locally-sourced statistics For practitioners & policy makers… data should tell a compelling story.

SIMD 2016 – Official Tool 7 SIMD DOMAINS INCOME EMPLOYMENT HEALTH (38 INDICATORS) INCOME EMPLOYMENT HEALTH EDUCATION HOUSING GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS CRIME

SIMD 2016 – Official Tool GLASGOW CITY

SIMD 2016 – Official Tool DUNDEE CITY 20% MOST DEPRIVED

SIMD 2016 – Official Tool MORAY (ELGIN) 20% MOST DEPRIVED

SIMD 2016 – Official Tool ABERDEENSHIRE 20% MOST DEPRIVED

SIMD 2016 - Fraserburgh & Peterhead POSSIBLE CRITERIA FOR LOCALITIES INTERMEDIATE GEOGRAPHY: FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA INTERMEDIATE GEOGRAPHY: PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA PETERHEAD HARBOUR

POSSIBLE CRITERIA FOR LOCALITIES FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA SIMD 2016 - Fraserburgh & Peterhead FRASERBURGH PETERHEAD POSSIBLE CRITERIA FOR LOCALITIES Area is large enough to ensure effective partnership working and small enough to ensure effective community engagement; Comprises of at least 500, and no more than 30,000, people; Allows for the easy alignment of data; and May be compared to similar areas throughout Scotland. 1 2 3 4 FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA PETERHEAD HARBOUR

Socio-economic Gap BASED ON 6 INDICATORS BETTER OUTCOMES BEST RANKING ALL INTERMEDIATE GEOGRAPHIES IN ABERDEENSHIRE BASED ON 6 INDICATORS AND ADDING TO QUADRANT CHART POORER OUTCOMES WORST HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

GAP Socio-economic Gap SOCIO-ECONOMIC BETTER OUTCOMES POORER OUTCOMES HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators CHILD POVERTY RATE (%) BETTER OUTCOMES POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

HOSPITAL STAYS RELATED TO ACLOHOL Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators BETTER OUTCOMES HOSPITAL STAYS RELATED TO ACLOHOL (Scotland = 100) POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

COMPARATIVE ILLNESS FACTOR Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators BETTER OUTCOMES COMPARATIVE ILLNESS FACTOR (SCOTLAND = 100) POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators NEETs AGED 16-19 YEARS (%) BETTER OUTCOMES POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

EMPLOYMENT DEPRIVATION (%) Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators EMPLOYMENT DEPRIVATION (%) BETTER OUTCOMES POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

STANDARDISED MORTALITY RATIO Socio-economic Gap – Specific Indicators BETTER OUTCOMES STANDARDISED MORTALITY RATIO (SCOTLAND = 100) POORER OUTCOMES PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA FETTERESSO, NETHERLEY AND CATTER HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES Socio-economic Gap – Local & National Context BETTER OUTCOMES ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES ONLY POORER OUTCOMES HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY

ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES Socio-economic Gap – Local & National Context BETTER OUTCOMES FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA PETERHEAD HARBOUR FRASERBURGH LOCHPOTS PETERHEAD BAY BANFF ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES ONLY ABERDEENSHIRE GEOGRAPHIES SCOTTISH CONTEXT SIMD 2016 30% MOST DEPRIVED 13 OF 15 DATA ZONES POORER OUTCOMES HIGH CHILD POVERTY LOW CHILD POVERTY ALL 6 DATA ZONES 20% MOST DEPRIVED

Areas more frequently ranking in ‘bottom 5’ FRASERBURGH HARBOUR & BROADSEA (13) FRASERBURGH LOCHPOTS (11) FRASERBURGH CENTRAL-ACADEMY (8) PETERHEAD HARBOUR (12) PETERHEAD BAY (8) HUNTLY (4) BANFF (3) INVERURIE SOUTH (2) NEW PITSLIGO (2) TURRIFF (2) INCOME DEPRIVATION EMPLOYMENT DEPRIVATION COMPARATIVE ILLNESS FACTOR HOSPITAL STAYS (ALCOHOL USE) HOSPITAL STAYS (DRUG USE) SCHOOL PUPIL ATTENDANCE SCHOOL PUPIL ATTAINMENT NO QUALIFICATIONS CRIME RATE OVERCROWDING PRESCRIBED DRUGS FOR DEPRESSION LOW BIRTH RATE EMERGENCY HOSPITAL STAYS AVERAGE DRIVE TIME TO LOCAL AMENITIES ANTENATAL SMOKING

Correlations – Specific Indicators & SIMD Rankings ABERDEENSHIRE SIMD OVERALL RANKINGS IN DEPRIVED AREAS… INCOME DEPRIVATION - HIGH 82% EMPLOYMENT DEPRIVATION - HIGH 81% COMPARATIVE ILLNESS FACTOR - HIGH 78% NO QUALIFICATIONS - HIGH 70% PUPIL ATTENDANCE - LOW 59% PUPIL ATTAINMENT - LOW 50% OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDS - HIGH 45% 16-19 NEETS - HIGH 40% EMERGENCY HOSPITAL STAYS - HIGH 39% STRONGLY CORRELATED TO OVERALL SIMD RANKINGS

END Summary ABERDEENSHIRE SIMD MAIN POINTS… OVERALL RANKINGS END MAIN POINTS… Data allows us to advance on an evidence-led basis. Sometimes data can tell a compelling story. There are a number of tools we can use to identify inequality – SIMD, the Community Outcomes Profile tool, etc., and there are various techniques (e.g. maps, quadrant charts, etc.). Four criteria for defining a locality were proffered as a possible starting point for discussion. Intermediate Geographies / Data Zones are helpful from an analytical perspective and in terms of performance measurement. Regeneration Plans and other similar initiatives tend to focus on areas that exhibit multiple deprivation, e.g. Peterhead & Fraserburgh – should we look elsewhere?