Measurements of a and future projections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
CP Violation Reach at Very High Luminosity B Factories Abi Soffer Snowmass 2001 Outline: Ambiguities B  DK B  D*     etc. B  D*  a 0   etc. (“designer.
Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Polarization fraction & time-dependent CP analysis of measured at Belle. March 2008 – Geneva Swiss Physical Society – Annual meeting Kim Vervink.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
1 Disclaimer This talk is not for B physics experts. Taipei101 If you did it, you may check s during my talk. B0B0 B0B0.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
Interpreting CP asymmetries in. B   CP asymmetries Tree diagram: Penguin diagram: need |P/T| and  =arg(P/T) R t /R c R u /R c   
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Princeton University, Department of Physics Jadwin Hall, Washington Rd. Princeton, NJ , U.S.A. XXXIII International.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
D0 mixing and charm CP violation
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
Hadronic B Decays at BELLE and BABAR
From the Collaboration of
Status of mixing and CP-violation measurements at LHCb
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
Search for Super-Penguins: CP Violation in B0->K+K-K0
Search for CP Violating Decays of theU(4S)
Measurements of the UT Angle a from BABAR
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
Measurements of g and sin(2b+g ) in BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
Direct CP Violation in Observation of and search for
BESIII 粲介子的强子衰变 周晓康 中国科学技术大学 BESIII 粲介(重)子物理研讨会.
Misure dell’angolo a del Triangolo Unitario
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
Constraints on α from B Decays at BaBar
f3 measurements by Belle
The Measurement of sin2β(eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays with BABAR
Sin(2β) measurement with b→c transitions in BaBar
Study of the suppressed decay B-DK- and B-D(*)CPK- decays at Belle
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Measurements of sin(2b + g) / sin(2f1 + f3)
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of a and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines

Outline Introduction to the measurement of a Results from the B-factories: B p+ p-, p± p0, p0 p0 B r+ r-, r± r0, r0 r0 B0 (r p)0 Summary and outlook Will not cover expectations at LHC and Super B-Factories See talks of P. Robbe and A. Bevan

Inc. penguin contribution Measuring a Access to a from the interference of a b→u decay (g) with B0B0 mixing (b) Inc. penguin contribution

From aeff to a: Isospin Analysis Gronau and London, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3381 (1990) Assume SU(2) symmetry among amplitudes Neglecting EW Penguins: is a pure tree mode. The triangles share a common side.

Time Dependent Analysis Outline Fully reconstruct the B decaying to a CP eigenstate. Tag the flavor of the other B. Mis-tag probability measured in Bflav sample. Measure Dt. Extract S and C with a ML fit on a signal enriched sample. Signal PDF from MC. Background PDF from MC or sidebands

Variables used in the ML fit Event Topology Combine variables in F or N signal signal PID info: DIRC + dE/dX (BaBar) Aerogel + dE/dX (Belle) Dt background background

:results (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0607106 :results (preliminary) Background Signal B0tag mES B0tag mES DE DE Npp = 675±42 sPlot

:results (preliminary) 535 million BB hep-ex/0608035 :results (preliminary) Npp = 1464±65

:results (preliminary) C =−A :results (preliminary) 347 million BB Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Spp = - 0.53 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 BaBar (Spp, Cpp) = (0.0, 0.0) excluded at 3.6 s Average 535 million BB Belle Cpp = - 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05 Spp = - 0.61 ± 0.10 ± 0.04 2.3 s discrepancy Observation of Direct CPV at 5.5 s Observation of mixing-induced CPV at 5.6 s

(preliminary) Np±p0 = 572 ± 53 Np0p0 = 140 ± 25 347 million BB hep-ex/0607106 Np±p0 = 572 ± 53 Np0p0 = 140 ± 25

a constraint from Da = a - aeff Da a a 1- C.L. |Da| < 41o at 90% C.L. a a 1- C.L. Frequentist interpretation: use only the B→pp branching fractions and isospin-triangle relations. No stringent constraint from pp system alone  need rr and rp

The analysis Worse than pp at first sight: However: V V final state. Mixture of CP = +1 and -1: need to know each fraction However: ~100% longitudinally polarized (~pure CP-even state) no need for elaborate angular analysis Branching fraction for B0 g r+r- is larger than p+p- Branching fraction for B0 g r0r0 is small (~1.1x10-6) small penguin pollution

results (preliminary) 347 million BB results (preliminary) hep-ex/0607098

275 million BB results PRL 96, 171801 (2006) Nrr = 194±32

results (preliminary)

results (preliminary) 232 million BB results (preliminary) hep-ex/0607092 Nr+r0 =390 ± 49

results (preliminary) 347 million BB results (preliminary) hep-ex/0607097 Nr0r0 = 98 ± 32 ± 22 3.0 s evidence

a constraint from a hep-ex/0607098 PRL 96, 171801 (2006) at 68.3% C.L. Use BR(B->r0r0)<1.1 X 10-6 a Frequentist interpretation: use only the B→ρρ branching fractions, polarization fractions and isospin-triangle relations. First evidence of B→r0r0 Constraint on a is less stringent

The Dalitz analysis r+p- r-p+ B0 r0p0 p+p-p0 B0 Monte Carlo A. Snyder and H. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 2139 (1993) r+p- r-p+ r0p0 B0 p+p-p0 B0 Monte Carlo Time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis assuming isospin simmetry. 26 coefficients of the bilinear form factor terms occurring in the decay rate are measured with a UML fit. Physically relevant quantities are derived from subsequent fits to these coefficients. Interference provides information on strong phase difference r(1450) and r(1700) are included

analysis (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0608002 m’ and q’ are the transformed Dalitz variables

analysis (preliminary) 449 million BB hep-ex/0609003 Dalitz + Isospin (pentagon) analysis 26(Dalitz) + 5(Br(rp), Br(r+p0), Br(r0p+), A(r+p0), and A(r0p+)) r+p- r-p+ r0p0 Signal SCF BB bkg continuum mass helicity

a constraint from (preliminary) [0,8]o U [60,95]o U[129,180]o at 68.3% C.L. 1- C.L. 1- C.L. a (deg) a (deg)

a constraints Belle rp result is not included. It will weakens the suppression of solutions around 0o and 180o. CKMfitter http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/ UTfit http://utfit.dreamhosters.com/ a constraints Global Fit B-Factories aB-Factories = [ 93 ] º +11 -9 aB-Factories = [92 ± 7]o (SM Solution) aGlobal Fit = [93 ± 6]o Nice agreement aGlobal Fit = [ 98 ] º +5 -19

Pending Issues Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Discrepancy on Cpp Solutions at 0o and 180o should be (more) suppressed. Using rp: nice suppression from BaBar, not from Belle. Background modeling. Interference with other resonances or non-resonant component in rp, rr modes. Subtleties on statistical analysis with small statistics. Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Cpp = - 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05

Uncertainties on a extraction Possible contribution of EW penguin and isospin breaking effect. EW penguin effect seems to be small (~2°). Other isospin breaking effect ~ O(1°). [M.Gronau and J.Zupan PRD 71, 074017(2005)] I=1 contribution due to finite width of r mass (rr mode). [A.Falk et al. PRD 69, 011502(R)] Too small to be an issue at B-factories

Summary and Outlook The three modes are complementary. Need to study them all. Good agreement between the CKM fit (a determined by others) and direct measurements. Still a lot to do. Refine previous analysis and exploit new ideas: a from B->a1p ? Constraint on a from B0->r+r- and B+->K*0r+ [M. Beneke et al., Phys. Lett. B638, 68(2006)] Doubling of statistics at the B-factories is much needed. Looking forward to LHC and to a Super B-Factory.

Backup Slides

Time Dependent CP Asymmetry mixing decay Amplitude ratio CP eigenvalue

BABAR Detector

DIRC: Control samples for p and K Projection for 2.5 < p < 3 GeV/c

:results (preliminary) Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Spp = - 0.53 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 (Spp, Cpp) = (0.0, 0.0) excluded at 3.6 s

:results (preliminary) App = + 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05 Spp = - 0.61 ± 0.10 ± 0.04 Observation of Direct CPV at 5.5 s Observation of mixing-induced CPV at 5.6 s

a constraint from

a constraint from

formalism Direct CP Violation CP violation in the interference with and without B mixing.

parameters (prelim)

Direct CP violation in Significance for non-zero DCPV: BaBar: 3.0 s Belle: 2.4 s