Patient-Centered Medical Home: From Concept to Reality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
House Price
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Presentation transcript:

Patient-Centered Medical Home: From Concept to Reality Consumer Purchaser Disclosure Project October 17, 2007 Lisa Latts MD, MSPH VP, Programs in Clinical Excellence

More than 34 million Members Across the Country WellPoint, Inc More than 34 million Members Across the Country NH CT ME MA VA KY OH IN IL WI MO TX CO CA NV GA NY BC or BCBS licensed plans UniCare >100K members 9/18/2018

Patient-Centered Medical Home Definition of an “Patient-Centered Medical Home” (PCMH): a primary care practice that provides patients with accessible, continuous and coordinated care through a patient-centered, physician-guided, cost-efficient and longitudinal approach to care What is a Medical Home:* Each patient has an ongoing relationship with a personal physician trained to provide first contact, continuous and comprehensive care Physician-directed medical practice in which a team of individuals collectively take responsibility for ongoing care of patients Whole-person orientation of care for all stages of life Care is coordinated and/or integrated across all elements of the health care system Quality and safety are hallmarks of the medical home Patients have enhanced access to care through systems such as open scheduling, expanded hours and new options for communication Payment appropriately recognizes the added value to patients who have a medical home Medical Home is NOT: Reemergence of capitation Just another way to increase primary care reimbursement Panacea for rising heath care costs Net increase of dollars into the health care system 9/18/2018 * Adopted by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)

Why the Medical Home Primary care is important to the delivery system – current crisis in primary care recruitment and retention Medical home may be the (a) answer to increased quality, reimbursement and provider/patient satisfaction Aging population & increased prevalence of chronic diseases Current system emphasizes episodic treatment for acute care and more care, not better care; Capitation led to less care Rising healthcare costs and gaps/variations in quality and safety Need for better coordination of care among providers; care coordinated by a personal physician associated with better outcomes, especially in many chronic diseases Disease management as currently exists yielding mixed results; DM activities most successful when integrated into a physician practice Collaboration with national and local primary care providers to explore innovations and piloting PCMH models Goals to improve safety, quality, affordability, and experience of care 9/18/2018

Collaborating for Quality and Affordability Primary Care ACP AAFP AOA AAP Purchasers Patient-Centered Medical Home Patient Advocacy Groups Health Insurers 9/18/2018 © 2007 Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. All Rights Reserved.

Health Information Technology Clinical Process and Outcome Measures Pilot Program Model Implementation Coordination Implement in states across the country Recruit variety of practice shapes and sizes Large IPAs/ multi-specialty groups Smaller PCP group practices Solo and Duo Practice groups NQCQ Practice Designation - PPC Timing: Q1/Q2 2008 Coordinate pilot sites with other payers, especially CMS Critical mass of patients necessary for PCMH success Coordinate with other programs Pay for Performance Disease Management Transparency Programs Decision-support Evaluation Care Coordination Health Information Technology Clinical Process and Outcome Measures Resource Use Cost of Care Satisfaction Comprehensive evaluation Discussions with Commonwealth Fund, RAND 9/18/2018

Patient-Centered Medical Home Demonstrations - BCBSA 2007-2008 Pilot Planning WA ME MT MT ND VT MN NH OR MA WI NY ID SD ID MI RI WY PA NJ CT IA NE OH NV MD DE NV IN IL UT WV DC CA CO VA KS MO KY NC TN NM OK AR SC AZ MS AL GA LA AK TX FL HI PR PR 9/18/2018 = States where PCMH demonstrations are in planning for 2008 Participation as of 10/15/07

Personal Medical Home Reimbursement and incentive structure aligned to support practice transformation, clinical process/outcomes, cost of care and satisfaction Payment Methodology Prospective Payment FFS Pay For Quality For services currently recognized through Medicare RBRVS system; potential for additional services NCQA’s PPC Recognition: Care Coordination Process Redesign HIT Evaluate Levels of Achievement Clinical Process and Outcomes Resource Use/ Cost of Care Satisfaction Pre-Assessment of Practice Readiness Support from ACP, AAFP and AAP 9/18/2018

PCMH Project Questions Practice Recruitment Current WellPoint interest in ME, NH, WI, VA, CO, CA Coordinate with local ACP, AAFP chapters to recruit Urban/suburban/rural Large/medium/small/single What is critical payer mass for practice PCMH Designation NCQA PPC Program – time to get practices designated Who pays? Differences by level of designation attained Technical Support “Reward” for increasing levels Purchaser participation Employee incentives to use Medical Home practices? Care Coordination Payment All patients or just chronic disease? Which disease(s)? How much? How often? Opt in or opt out model for patients Timing of Program: Start, interim evaluation, final evaluation At least 18 month for adequate trial of effects What to do in the interim Evaluation Where, What, Who and How Definition of Success? Key components of success vs. elements that provide no incremental value Transparency What if….. 9/18/2018