CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading Stephen Stead CRM-SIG Paveprime Ltd University of Southampton British Museum July 2017

Agenda CRMinf: recording Sloan assertions New requirements Proposed Extension Factoid Prosopography Conclusion

Spatial Relations Between Catalogue Entry Versions (S1) E31 Document Original Misc 4 E31 Document Misc 4 X P128 is carried by P128 is carried by P128 is carried by P128 is carried by E24 Physical Man-Made Thing ESL127704 E25 Man-Made Feature Marks of Misc 4 X E25 Man-Made Feature Marks of Original Misc 4 P53 has former or current location P59 has section P53 has former or current location P59 has section E53 Place Place of Original Misc 4 text E53 Place Place of Misc 4 X symbol P122 borders with P122 P122 E53 Place Place of Misc 4 L226 text E53 Place Place of Misc 4 25 text P122

Evolution of Catalogue Entry A] 4.-> X-> L226-> 25 B] 4.-> L226->X-> 25 C] 4.-> L226-> 25-> X Others?

Evolution of Catalogue Entries (A) E65 Creation Creation of Misc 4 E31 Document Original Misc 4 P94i was created by P16 used specific object P106i forms part of & P148i is component of E31 Document Misc 4 X P94i P106i & P148i E65 Creation Creation of X and Version 2 Misc 4 E31 Document Version 2 Misc 4 P94i was created by P16 P106i & P148i E31 Document Misc 4 L226 E65 Creation Creation of L226 and Version 3 Misc 4 P94i E31 Document Version 3 Misc 4 P94i was created by P16 P106i & P148i P106i & P148i E31 Document Misc 4 25 P94i E65 Creation Creation of 25 and Version 4 Misc 4 E31 Document Version 4 Misc 4 P94i

CRMinf classes: Temporal Entities E13 Attribute Assignment CRM CRMsci CRMinf S15 Observable Entity I1 Argumentation E2 Temporal Entity S5 S4 Observation I5 Inference Making I7 Belief Adoption I2 Belief

CRMinf classes: Others E28 Conceptual Object CRM CRMinf E59 Primitive Value E90 Symbolic Object E89 Propositional Object I6 Belief Value E73 Information Object I3 Inference Logic I4 Proposition Set

CRMinf Argumentation CRM I1 Argumentation I7 Belief Adoption E39 Actor P14 carried out by (performed) CRM E39 Actor I1 Argumentation I7 Belief Adoption CRMinf J2 concluded that (was concluded by) P116 starts J6 adopted (adopted by) P17 was motivated by I5 Inference Making I2 Belief J1 used as premise (was premise for) P17 was motivated by J3 applies (was applied by) P16 used specific object J5 holds to be (is held by) J4 that (is subject of) I4 Proposition Set I6 Belief Value I3 Inference Logic

Modelling my Beliefs in Evolutions A, B and C E39 Actor Person SdS P14 carried out by I5 Inference Making Evolution Decision J2 concluded that I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 J1 used as premise J4 that J5 holds to be J3 applies I2 Belief BM Belief in Spatial Relations of Misc 4 I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True I3 Inference Logic Catalogue Text Rules J2 concluded that J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution B of Misc 4 I4 Proposition Set S1 I6 Belief Value True J4 that J5 holds to be I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution C of Misc 4 I4 Proposition Set Evolution B I6 Belief Value False J4 that J5 holds to be I4 Proposition Set Evolution C I6 Belief Value False

Trusting a Belief P14 carried out by I7 Belief Adoption Adopting SdS belief E39 Actor Group BCHK17 J6 adopted J2 concluded that I2 Belief SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 I2 Belief BCHK17 Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 J4 that J5 holds to be J4 that J5 holds to be I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True I4 Proposition Set Evolution A I6 Belief Value True

The New Bit Text A- easy to represent content No desire to document the process Text B- easy to represent content Text A and Text B disagree I like A: Why? Multi-Vocality

Author’s position Like War Retribution I am going to kill you because you killed my brother Anticipation I am going to kill you because I killed your brother Diplomacy I am going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that your brother did it HHGTTG, Adams 1978

Author’s position Report Propaganda Manipulation Author describes what they believe happened Propaganda Author describes what they want you to believe happened Manipulation Author describes what they want you to think they believe happened OR Author describes what they think, you want them to believe happened

Proposed Extension I2 Belief CRM CRMinf E73 Information Object Ix Reading J5 holds to be (is held by) E73 Information Object Jx1 understands (understood by) I6 Belief Value: Default=“True” Jx2 believing provenance I4 Proposition Set: Provenance Jx3 reading as I4 Proposition Set: Triples of E73 content

Factoid Prosopography http://factoid-dighum.kcl.ac.uk/what-is-factoid-prosopography-all-about/

Mapping Factoid Model to CRM Paisin & Bradley 2012

What the aim is

What it is not CRM and CRMinf are not AI No attempt to automate reasoning The CRMinf extension only for “normal” cases Anything not “vanilla default” use full description

Conclusion CRMinf can document use of texts Full detail not always required Shortcuts using “normal” values may reduce documentation burden Development Effort Concentrates On What are the shortcuts AND What is “normal”