René Wilhelm & Henk Uijterwaal RIPE NCC APNIC21, 18 September 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited Geoff Huston March 2004 Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make.
Advertisements

IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Paul Wilson, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Geoff Huston, APNIC March 2006 APRICOT 2006 IPv4 Numerology.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited Geoff Huston September 2003 Presentation to the RIPE 46 Plenary Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional.
BGP AS Number Exhaustion Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC March 2003.
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.
RFC 2050 Working Group Ray Plzak ARIN On behalf of Mark McFadden.
IPv4 Run Out and Transitioning to IPv6 Marco Hogewoning Trainer, RIPE NCC.
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.
March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
IPv6 Addressing – Status and Policy Report Paul Wilson Director General, APNIC.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 31 October 2005 Australian IPv6 Summit.
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
An overview of IP addressing history and policy issues Leo Vegoda Number Resources Manager, IANA.
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
Life After IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile. Overview ARIN’s current IPv4 inventory Trends and observations Ways to obtain IP addresses post IPv4 depletion.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
John Curran APNIC 29 5 March 2010 ARIN Update. 4-byte ASN Stats In 2009 – Received 197 requests for 4-byte ASNs – 140 changed request to 2-byte – ARIN.
IPv4 Address Allocation Trends J. Scott Marcus Chief Technology Officer (CTO) May 22, 2001.
1 AS Consumption Patterns Geoff Huston APNIC May 2005.
Anne Lord & Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Workshop, 10 May IP Address Management AfNOG Workshop, 11 May 2001 Accra, Ghana presented by:
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 26 October 2005 ARIN XVI.
1 IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Paul Wilson, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
IP Addressing and ICT Development in the Pacific Islands Anne Lord and Save Vocea, APNIC ICT Workshop, Fiji, November, 2002.
AS Numbers NANOG 35 Geoff Huston APNIC. Current AS Number Status.
Policies for ASN Management in the Asia Pacific Region – Revised Draft Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
Early Registration Record Transfers Richard Jimmerson Director of Operations APNIC 11Kuala Lumpur.
Internet Protocol Addresses What are they like and how are the managed? Paul Wilson APNIC.
News from APNIC German Valdez Communications Area Manager RIPE October 2008.
Registration Services Feedback Andrea Cima RIPE NCC RIPE 67 - Athens.
IPv4. The End of the World is nigh (er) ! Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
Policy SIG Report APNIC AGM Friday 29 August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand 1.
RIPE Network Coordination Centre October Andrew de la Haye 32-bit ASN Adjustment to Global Policy Proposal Stacy Hughes Andrew.
IP Address Management The RIR System Nurani Nimpuno APNIC.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
AS Numbers - Again Geoff Huston APNIC October 2009
Routing 2015 Scaling BGP Geoff Huston APNIC May 2016.
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers
Addressing 2015 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv4.
IPv4 Addresses.
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Routing and Addressing in 2017
Geoff Huston APNIC August 2009
IPv6 Documentation Address Policy
IPv6 Address Allocation APNIC
Geoff Huston September 2002
RIPE October 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited
News from APNIC ARIN XXII 16 October 2008.
Nurani Nimpuno On behalf of Geoff Huston APNIC 25 May 2006
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
4-Byte AS number registry Policy Proposal [LACNIC Proposal ]
DNS Operations SIG APNIC , Kyoto
Recovery of Unused Address Space prop-017-v001
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations
Overview of policy proposals
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
Feedback From NCC Registration Services
Presentation transcript:

René Wilhelm & Henk Uijterwaal RIPE NCC APNIC21, 18 September 2018 ASN Missing In Action René Wilhelm & Henk Uijterwaal RIPE NCC APNIC21, 18 September 2018 Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Agenda Motivation Data sources Results Modeling Conclusions Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Motivation Assume that you know what an AS is Each AS needs an unique identifier, its ASN ASN are assigned in a hierarchical way IANA → RIRs → (NIRs →) LIRs → End-Users Guarantees uniqueness Public registers available of all ASN ASN are a limited resource 16 bits Private use and some overhead 64510 available Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Motivation (3) Who has an ASN? ASN Assignment Policy Based on “Demonstrated Need” Global assignment policy, RFC 1930 Local policies by the RIRs If you meet the requirements, ask for one Policies say that one has to return the ASN if the need disappears Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

So, all assigned ASN are in the RIB, right? Motivation (2) Can we see which ASN are in use? The Internet is a network of AS Each AS wants to be able to send traffic to any other AS RIB in your router has a list of all ASN in use ASN are assigned based on demonstrated need So, all assigned ASN are in the RIB, right? Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Motivation (4) What is happening here? Euuhh, well, not quite… Early 2003: RIRs 20000 ASN assigned 300 new/month RIBs: 14000 ASN visible 200 new/month What is happening here? Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Agenda Motivation Data sources Results Modeling Conclusions Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Data sources The RIRs publish Stats Files List of ASN and date assigned Daily report since 2002 Extrapolate back in time for earlier dates Corrected for mistakes, double-counts, etc. Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Data sources (2) RIPE NCC Routing Information Service, RIS One of the projects to collect BGP info RIBs from 450 peers (IPv4 and IPv6) All BGP updates Data from 18 August 2000 to 1 August 2005 Each AS path Break down into its components Generate a list of AS and when they were in use Remove private ASN Remove ASN seen for less than 1 week Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Data sources (3) CIDR report Weekly report on the Internet from AS4637 Available since 1994 Includes number of ASN seen in the RIB Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Agenda Motivation Data sources Results Modeling Conclusions Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

What do we have after this? 2 lists: ASN assigned: RIR Stats Files (“Theory”) ASN in use: RIS and CIDR report (“Practice”) Compare the two An ASN appears in both: normal case ASN in use but not assigned Inappropriate use Problem with the registration mechanism ASN assigned but not in use Missing In Action or MIA Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

ASN in use but not registered 436 ASN used but not registered 255 still visible on 1/8/2005 215 in RIPE NCCs ranges Old registrations Found other data for 214 40 in ARINs ranges 0 in APNICs ranges 7 ASN outside all RIR ranges Accuracy At most 41 out of 33000 with no records (0.12%) 1 out of 10000 for the RIPE NCC Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Total Number of ASN seen Assigned (■,■) Actual (■,■) End Start of Internet Bubble Increase in MIA Constant #ASN MIA Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Linear or Exponential growth Looking at the plots indicates that growth is linear Tests: Fit to linear and exponential curve Linear describes the data best Look at derivatives All indicate linear growth Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

■ Data Linear fit Exponential fit Linear or Exponential ■ Data Linear fit Exponential fit Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Growth rates 284 + 43 ASN new allocations/month 105 + 31 ASN disappear (note peak at the end) Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Growth rate per registry (ARIN) 3 Curves: New assignments New/re- assignment Disappearing Recovery of ASN since 2004 Reassigning since 2005 Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Growth rate per registry (RIPE NCC) Very little recovery Rate seems to increase Total rate compensated by ARIN’s recovery 3 Curves: New assignments New/re- assignment Disappearing Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Growth rate per registry (APNIC) Very little recovery with 1 exception Rate constant since mid 2003 3 Curves: New assignments New/re- assignment Disappearing Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Only 60-63% of all assigned ASN are visible on the net Fraction of ASN seen Only 60-63% of all assigned ASN are visible on the net Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

ASN Not Seen on the Internet 33681 ASN assigned on 1/8/2005 20101 in the RIS 7037 ASN have never been used 5046 were retired Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Age of Retired ASN People use an AS for a few years, then stop using it Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

ASN active over time  80% active after one year  40% still active after 10 years Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

ASN active over time (2) Why does this drop? Two effects: Sites go out of business No incentive to return an ASN Little recovery by RIRs Networks merge Need for one ASN (often) disappears No incentive to return the unused ASN Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Activation Delay (APNIC 2001/2002/2003/2004) Time between assignment and appearance in the RIS 40% appears within 2 months 2 out of 3 after 200 days 20% never appears Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Activation in Practice and Reality ARIN: Policy is that there must be plans to use the ASN within 30 days after assignment RIPE NCC: No policy, informal discussion 3 months APNIC: Policy: meet requirements upon receiving an ASN (or reasonably soon thereafter) This does not happen in practice Time is considerably longer  20% never appears on the net even though there was demonstrated need Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Agenda Motivation Data sources Results Modeling Conclusions Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

When will the Internet run out of 16 bit ASN? 33681 assigned on 1/8/2005 30830 still available 284 + 31 assignments/month from the unused pool 108.5 months to go Run out in 8 to 11 years, or 2013 to 2016 Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Can we make the pool last longer? Reclaim what disappears: 284 - 105 = 179 assignments/month 15 + 4 years, or 2016 to 2024 Reclaim what is assigned but not used: 160 + 40 assignments/month 23 + 5 years, or 2023 to 2033 Use 4 bytes for the ASN 4x109 numbers and that will last for a million years Draft exists Has to be implemented and deployed Ask your vendor, make plans Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Policy changes Current policies based on demonstrated need But: Only 63% is actively used 20% is never used It is too easy to demonstrate need Revisit policies and use stricter criteria This should be discussed in the policy WG of the RIRs Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Reclaim unused resources Uniqueness is essential What if somebody starts using assigned resources again? No good mechanism for recovery Certification might be the answer Efforts in the APNIC and RIPE Region Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Certification Certificate to show that a resource is assigned to somebody 1 year period Renewable No need to renumber If the certificate expires, one can reuse the resource Will require people to check… … but this is expected to become standard practice for securing the routing system Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Agenda Motivation Data sources Results Modeling Conclusions Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Conclusions Number of ASN assigned 284 ASN assigned per month from the unused pool Actual growth is only 160/month At this rate, the pool will be empty by 2013 -2016 Reclamation will make the pool last longer Certification might help to accomplish this If one does not want this, then one should start to think about deploying 4 byte ASN Full paper: www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-353.html Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Acknowledgements CIDR report: Tony Bates, Geoff Huston, Philip Smith RIPE NCC: Adrian Bedford, Daniel Karrenberg, Alex Le Heux, Leo Vegoda, Filiz Yilmaz ARIN: Cathy Murphy RIS crew @ RIPE NCC Registration departments of the RIRs and Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018

Questions? Henk Uijterwaal 18 September 2018