Federal Grants Management Test

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allowability and Grants Management Test When Working With NonTraditional Providers Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Advertisements

Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Raúl Soto Ph.D., Associate Director CTE 1 CTE Funding & OMNI Circular.
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
Grants Administration Updates - OMB’s Uniform Guidance Division of Grants Administration Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Texas Education.
Carl D. Perkins Career & Technical Education Act of 2006 The Law, The Myths, The Legends February 2015.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Tiffany R. Winters, Time and Effort Documentation Best Practices 1 Mike F. Bender, Esq.
TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING: THE BASICS Steven Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Omni Circular Key Area #6: Allowability of Meals and Conferences Jennifer Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2014.
Grant Requirement Reminders Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Ms. Jackie Reese, Audit Unit Manager Mr. Richard.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Subrecipient Monitoring and Common Findings By USDE Kristen Tosh Cowan, EsquireTiffany R. Winters, Esquire
GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Effort Takes Time and Documentation MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC SPRING FORUM 2015.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST ERIN AUERBACH JENNIFER CASTILLO BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC FALL FORUM 2015.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Shift to Greater Flexibility Under Federal Grants
HOOKS ISD Federal, State and Local Policies and Procedures Manual Training for Campus Personnel U.S. Education Department General Administrative Regulations.
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
GEPA Appeal: Who? What? When? Why? Where?
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
“Are You Ready for WIOA?”
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Your Policies and Procedures are Compliant
Understanding Supplement Not Supplant Under ESSA, IDEA, and Perkins
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
“The Georgia and Maine Stories” Impact on Recent Judicial Precedent on Federal Grants Management Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie Graham,
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
Allowability Hot Topics Under IDEA
Sponsored Programs at Penn
UGG - EDGAR …Taking another look … Model Policies & Procedures
How To Conduct a Control Self-Assessment
Back to 21st CCLC Basics October 4-5, 2018
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures
10 Biggest Changes Under the Every Student Succeeds Act
Using Data For cost allocation
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Office of Quality schools
Steven Spillan, Esq. 21st Century Programs Please visit Please visit
Managing Perkins Funds
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Federal Grants Management Test To Accountability…and Beyond!! Brustein & Manasevit 2016 Fall Forum November 30 – December 2, 2016 Federal Grants Management Test Bonnie Graham, Esq. and Mike Bender, Esq. bgraham@bruman.com mbender@bruman.com www.bruman.com

WELCOME CLASS Please put all of your books away. You have 10 minutes to complete your 29 question pop quiz!

Question 1 2 C.F.R. § 200.69 Pg. 94 2 C.F.R. Part 200 applies to states and districts, but not to non-profits. True False

Question 2 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(d)(3) Pg. 116 During your inventory of grant-purchased equipment, you discover a piece of equipment is missing. You are in compliance as long as you update the inventory records to indicate that the equipment went missing. True False

Question 3 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(e)(1) Pg. 116-117 When determining whether or not a State or LEA has an obligation to pay back the Federal share of a piece of equipment after disposition, the State or LEA must determine whether or not the item is valued at more or less than $5000. Value is determined at: The time of purchase The time of disposition At any point in time as long as it is within the grant period

Question 4 2 C.F.R. § 200.318, Pg. 118 2 C.F.R. § 200.302(6), Pg. 108 2 C.F.R. § 200.302(7), Pg. 108 Pursuant to EDGAR, the following list includes some of the policies and procedures that must be in writing: Employee benefits, inventory, and financial management Procurement, cash management, allowable costs No policies and procedures must be in writing Procurement, inventory, and time and effort

Question 5 2 C.F.R. § 200.305(b)(9) Pg. 110-111 Grantees and subgrantees must remit to HHS any interest earned on cash advances over: $1,000 $500 No earned interest must be remitted. All interest may be kept by the grantee or subgrantee All earned interest must be remitted to USDE

Question 6 34 C.F.R. § 76.730 Pg. 59 Under the micro purchase method, grantees and subgrantees do not have to maintain records for any purchase below $3500. True False

Question 7 2 C.F.R. § 200.302(b)(4) Pg. 108 Under EDGAR requirements, computing devices that cost less than $5000 may be considered supplies, as such grantees and subgrantees no longer need to have controls in place to safeguard such property. True False

Question 8 2 C.F.R. § 200.406 Pg. 132 Office Wow!, where you normally purchase your supplies from, is having a sale. The store is offering rebates on items that you need for your USDE program. You decided to purchase a scanner that costs $150 with a $50 rebate. The Federal grant can be charged: $150 $100 $50 Under EDGAR, printers are not an allowable cost

Question 9 Can you use Federal grant funds to pay a student’s 2 C.F.R. § 200.456 Pg. 156 Can you use Federal grant funds to pay a student’s registration fee to attend an employment seminar? No Yes, as long as the seminar is related to the grant program Yes, as long as you received prior approval from the Federal awarding agency and the cost is allocable to the grant Yes, as long as you obtain a receipt

Question 10 2 C.F.R. § 200.113 Pg. 102 During a happy hour discussion with your co-worker, you learn that your co-worker obtained a reimbursement of Federal grant funds for a tablet she purchased for her grandchild. It was a relatively small amount of funds compared with the total grant amount and as far as you know, this is the only time she has done something like this. You must: Tell your co-worker to return the funds Alert the local newspaper Tattle on your co-worker to the state or USDE Take your co-worker’s admission to the grave

Question 11 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(h) (Pg. 119) 2 C.F.R. § 200.326 (Pg. 122) 2 C.F.R. § 200.213 (Pg. 107) A friendly and competent vendor, who your office has worked with in the past, has recently been suspended or debarred. However, his quote is the lowest price out of the bids you collected for the goods you are looking to purchase. Can you contract with the vendor? Yes No

Question 12 34 C.F.R. § 76.707 Pg. 57 You are attending a conference in San Diego, California. The conference is in May and you purchase your airplane ticket in January. The airplane ticket obligates to the Federal grant award: On the date you decided to make travel arrangements. On the date the travel arrangements are booked and seat assignments are confirmed. On the date the travel arrangements are paid in full. On the date you take the flight to San Diego.

Question 13 Costs are allocable to the grant if: 2 C.F.R. § 200.405 Pg. 132 Costs are allocable to the grant if: The cost of the goods or services is proportionate to the benefits received by the grant At least 80% of the goods or services will directly benefit the grant The goods or services, in any way, benefit the grant objectives The cost of the goods or services was included in the budget proposal

Question 14 2 C.F.R. § 200.343(b) Pg. 129 All obligations must be liquidated within 90 days after the end of the grant award funding period. True False

Question 15 2 C.F.R. § 200.432 Pg. 145-146 You are in charge of hosting your annual conference. In preparation you make a list of all your conference costs. Currently your list includes: speakers’ fees, local transportation, supplies, and providing locally available dependent-care. What costs are not allowable? Speakers’ fees Local transportation Supplies Providing locally available dependent-care

Question 16 2 C.F.R. § 200.413(c) Pg. 134 Generally, the salaries of administrative and clerical staff must be treated as indirect costs. True False

Question 17 2 C.F.R. § 200.430(i) Pg. 141 An administrator spends 10% of her time working on Perkins administration activities and the rest of her time working on non-Federal activities. Because most of her time is spent on non-Federal activities, she does not need to keep time and effort reports. True False

Question 18 A subgrant is different from a contract because: 2 C.F.R. § 200.330 Pg. 124 A subgrant is different from a contract because: A subgrant provides goods and services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program A subgrant uses the Federal funds to carry out a program as compared to providing goods and services for a program A subgrant is not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program A subgrant and a contract are the same

Question 19 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(c)(4) Pg. 116 The Science Department uses telescopes that were purchased in 2005. The director of the department wants to upgrade the equipment because his students were unable to see the 2016 blood moon. He asks for new telescopes, stating “the next time an astronomical phenomenon occurs I want to be ready.” Can you trade in the old telescopes to offset the cost of the replacement telescopes? Yes No

Question 20 34 C.F.R. § 76.707 Pg. 57 You signed a contract on August 21, 2015 for a speaker to present at a professional development event hosted by your organization on September 21, 2015. The payment for the speaker is issued on October 1, 2015. The expense for the speaker obligated on: September 21, 2015 August 21, 2015 When the encumbrance is entered into your financial management system. October 1, 2015

Question 21 2 C.F.R. §200.430(h)(8)(viii) Pg. 142 Budget estimates alone are appropriate support for salary charges to a Federal award. True False

Question 22 A compliant conflict of interest policy must address: 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(c)(1) Pg. 118 A compliant conflict of interest policy must address: Academic dishonesty Gratuity violations Diversity in employment practices All of the above

Question 23 2 C.F.R. § 200.320(f) Pg. 121 Grantees and subgrantees may sole source procurement from a vendor as long as that vendor was included in an approved application. True False

Question 24 2 C.F.R. § 200.335 Pg. 126 Recipients are not permitted to retain and store electronic records. True False

Question 25 2 C.F.R. § 200.335 Pg. 126 When original records are in paper, electronic versions may be substituted provided that the electronic records: Are subject to periodic quality control reviews Provide reasonable safeguard against alteration Remain readable a, b, and c None of the above because electronic storage of records is not permitted

Question 26 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(c)(2) Pg.116 An LEA purchases a computer lab with Title I funds that meet the threshold for equipment under the State rules. Occasionally, students in the 21st CCLC after school program use the computer lab as well. This is permissible as long as: The shared use is minimal and it does not interfere with the Title I students’ ability to use the lab. The activities of the 21st CCLC students are allowable under Title I Such use is not permissible Other programs are permitted to use the computers as well

Question 27 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(d)(2) Pg. 116 Pursuant to EDGAR an inventory of equipment purchased in whole or in part with Federal funds must be conducted: Once every two years Yearly Once every six months Whenever you feel like it

Question 28 2 C.F.R. § 200.319(a) and (b) Pg. 119 The following circumstances restrict competition in procurement transactions: In state or local preferences Requiring unnecessary experience Specifying a brand name b and c a, b, and c

Question 29 2 C.F.R. § 200.313(c)(1) Pg. 116 An LEA no longer needs a piece of equipment purchased for an IDEA program, other programs supported with funds from USDE do not need the equipment either. May the equipment be used in a program supported with funds from the Department of Labor? Yes No

Questions?

Legal Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.