Institutional Best Practice Dialogue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIVISION II TRANSFER REQUIREMENTS Jenn Fraser and Alex Smith, Academic and Membership Affairs.
Advertisements

NCAA Division II Academic Success Rate Eric Hartung & Stephanie Quigg.
NCAA Division I Academic Portal Technology
Division II Federal Graduation Rates and Academic Success Rates Reporting.
Use Mobile Guidebook to Evaluate this Session NCAA Division I Academic Standards and Legislative Update SACRAO Transfer Conference February 18, 2014.
Limited Resource Institutions APP and Academic Certification Best Practices NCAA Regional Rules Seminar 2014 Eric Brey Quintin Wright Katy Yurk.
NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program Improvement Plans and Penalty Waivers – Best Practices Eric Brey and Katy Yurk.
Overview of Actions Taken by the NCAA Division I Board of Directors – October 2011 Adopted increased initial-eligibility standards. Adopted increased two-year.
NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program 2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars Data Collection.
2015 Regional Rules Seminar.  To understand four-year college transfer legislation.  To be able to accurately apply legislation to use best practices.
DIVISION II FINANCIAL AID KATIE WILLETT. SESSION OVERVIEW Review and apply select financial aid legislation.  Counter status.  Period of the award.
Fundamental Introduction NCAA Division III Bylaw 14
KATIE WILLETT 4-4 TRANSFERS. AGENDA Permission to Contact Requirements 4-4 Transfer Legislation Case Studies Best Practices Certifying International Transfers.
APR Improvement Plans April 2014 Lindsey McDonnell Director of Certification Curriculum National Association for Athletics Compliance.
Agenda NCAA Bylaw 14. Eligibility between terms. Exchange programs and study abroad. Transfers. NCAA Division III Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement.
Division I Academic Certification: Progress Toward Degree and Two-Year/Four-Year College Transfers Andy Cardamone Anne Rohlman.
NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program Overview A Fundamental Introduction Azure Davey Katy Yurk.
Jennifer Smith Eric Mayes.  Session outcomes.  Learning objectives.  Case studies.
Greg Dana Kris Richardson. Learning Objectives Recognize eligibility for financial aid issues. Describe changes implemented by financial aid reform. Apply.
SUSAN BRITSCH, KATIE WILLETT, KAREN WOLF 4-4 TRANSFERS.
Introduction to the NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program Rules Education Meeting University of Louisiana at Lafayette September 23, 2009.
Creating a Pathway to the NCAA Division I or Division II Student-Athlete Experience JCCA Summer Conference, Louisville, KY Thursday, August 1, 2013 NCAA.
Purpose of this information  Review existing NCAA Initial-Eligibility Requirements at the Division I level  Cover new requirements that will be in implemented.
NCAA Eligibility Basics
KENNESAW STATE COMPLIANCE COACHES EDUCATION SESSION FEBRUARY 16, 2012 ELIGIBILITY “BLACK AND GOLD, PROUD AND BOLD”
KELLY DIENER Assistant Athletic Director/Student Services NICOLE MCCOY Athletics Academic Advisor GRIFFITH WATSON Athletics Academic Advisor.
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
NCAA RULES EDUCATION IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND STAFF SESSION MARCH 9, 2012.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
Andy Cardamone Stephanie Castera Shauna Cobb Juliette Kenny.
Understanding New Legislation September A PSA may participate in institutional fundraisers prior to his or her initial collegiate enrollment provided.
What You Should Know About Financial Aid and TOPS
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! September 2010.
Academic Performance Program Michigan State University February 2005 Department of Intercollegiate Athletics & Office of the Faculty Athletics Representative.
DIVISION II ACADEMIC REPORTING Maria DeJulio Gregg Summers.
NCAA DIVISION I ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE PROGRAM: DATA POLICY AND CYCLE-TWO DATA REVIEWS CARRIE LEGER-WHITE, BINH T. NGUYEN AND ANNE ROHLMAN.
Division III Eligibility – Advanced Anne Rohlman.
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman.
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Eligibility 101- The Basics Brenda Blackburn & Krishna Lee NAIA.
Demystifying R2T4 for programs offered in modules.
NCAA Academic Performance Program Overview
NCAA Regional Rules Presentation
Duquesne University Monthly Compliance Meeting
Welcome to the World of Academics
The Registrar’s Office The Registrar’s Office RO–103 Grades
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman
Eligibility 101- The Basics
Conference Bylaw and multiyear AID agreements
Welcome to the World of Academics
NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program
Federal Graduation Rates and Academic Success Rates Reporting
Grants-in-Aid Revenue Distribution
Multiyear Financial Aid Agreements in Equivalency Sports
Division I Waivers Processed by Student-Athlete Reinstatement
Introduction to the Division I Academic Performance Program (APP)
NCAA Division I Introduction to Financial Aid
NCAA Initial-Eligibility Requirements
Division I Academic Update
University of North Florida: April 26, 2017 John Shukie & Kelly Brooks
Division I Committee on Academic Performance Waivers and Hearings
DIVISION II PROGRESS TOWARD DEGREE
Division I Financial Aid
National Letter of Intent
UAlbany Compliance Corner
NCAA Division I Introduction to Progress Toward Degree
NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program
Department of Athletics
NATIONAL LETTER OF INTENT
Division III Graduation Rates Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Best Practice Dialogue NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program Data Collection: Institutional Best Practice Dialogue Binh Nguyen Anne Rohlman

September 18, 2018 Objectives Share staff and membership expertise on NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program (APP) Data Collection. Develop strategies for efficiently submitting accurate data.

Overview September 18, 2018 APP. NCAA Division I Academic Progress Rate (APR)/Academic Performance Census Date (APC) Data Submission. Updates. Common issues and case studies. Best practices. Adjustments and Corrections.

September 18, 2018 APR and APC

What is the APR? Calculation What for? September 18, 2018 What is the APR? Rate that provides term-by-term snapshot of eligibility and retention. Submitted in APP Portal. Calculation What for? Points awarded for both eligibility and retention. Totaled over most recent four years. Used to determine eligibility for postseason, APP penalties and public recognition.

APP Data Collection Timeline September 18, 2018 APP Data Collection Timeline Data Submission Phase (Due six weeks after first day of classes) Verification Phase (NCAA staff) Correction/ Adjustment Phase (14 calendar days to submit) Penalty Waiver Phase (14 calendar days to submit) Final Submit (email sent to chancellor or president)

APR/APC Updates New academic portal. September 18, 2018 APR/APC Updates New academic portal. NCAA Division I Committee on Academic Performance approved elimination of financial aid data reporting. Originally collected to ensure financial aid information was available for possible penalties.

APR and APC Data Submission: Common Issues September 18, 2018 APR and APC Data Submission: Common Issues

Data Submission Issues September 18, 2018 Data Submission Issues Track and cross country cohorts. Multisport student-athlete (SA)s. Exhausted eligibility. Notes section.

Track/Cross Country APR Cohorts September 18, 2018 Track/Cross Country APR Cohorts Cross country and indoor and outdoor track and field have separate APR. Cohort comprised of SAs who receive athletics aid in any of the three sports and are on each respective team’s varsity roster as of the first date of competition of the championship segment. Don’t offer aid? Then cohort is comprised of recruited SAs who are on the roster as of the first date of competition. APP Manual Page No. 26

Received Aid (or recruited) On Roster as of First Competition September 18, 2018 Case Study #1 Sport Received Aid (or recruited) On Roster as of First Competition Cross Country No Indoor Yes Outdoor In which cohorts does this SA belong?

SA belongs in indoor and outdoor track cohorts. September 18, 2018 SA belongs in indoor and outdoor track cohorts. Is the SA entered correctly below?: No, to be included in the cohort, the SA must be reported as receiving aid in that sport.

Track/Cross Country APR Cohorts September 18, 2018 Track/Cross Country APR Cohorts Indicate “Received Aid” as “Yes” for each sport, if the SA meets the cohort definition for that sport. Review squad APR report to ensure correct prior to submission. Warning: “Receives aid in one men’s track sport that they participate in, but not all the others.”

Multisport SAs Should only be in cohort in which their aid counts. September 18, 2018 Multisport SAs Should only be in cohort in which their aid counts. Exception: Cross country and track. Use Figure 15-3 for guidance. Different than federal hierarchy used for NCAA Division I Graduation Success Rate (GSR). NCAA Figure 15-3

September 18, 2018 Case Study #1 We have an SA on athletics aid who competed in volleyball and softball. Which sport should we report her for APR purposes? Volleyball.

Exhausted Eligibility September 18, 2018 Exhausted Eligibility Cohort definition: Received athletics aid; and Enrolled full time as of fifth week of classes or official census date, whichever is earlier. Legislated exceptions and less than full-time enrollment. APP Manual Page No. 25

Exhausted Eligibility September 18, 2018 Exhausted Eligibility SAs beyond five years full-time enrollment and have exhausted eligibility not included in cohort. Noncounters who meet cohort definition included in cohort. Medical noncounters. Fifth-year SAs. APP Manual Page No. 25

September 18, 2018 Notes Section During verification phase, warnings are reviewed by NCAA staff. Staff may contact you regarding warnings. Additional review may be avoided by noting rationale for warning. e.g., percent-of-degree, earned zero hours, GPA is zero, etc.

Data Submission: Scenarios September 18, 2018 Data Submission: Scenarios

Common Questions Graduation and retention. Legislated exceptions. September 18, 2018 Common Questions Graduation and retention. Legislated exceptions. Impermissible financial aid.

Case Study 1: Graduation and Retention September 18, 2018 Case Study 1: Graduation and Retention Men’s basketball SA graduates in December. Continues as a graduate student in the spring, but does not pass six hours and is not retained. How should he be reported? Once SA graduates, he is always awarded retention point. Fall: 2/2 Spring: 1/2 APP Manual Page No. 32

Case Study 2: Legislated Exceptions September 18, 2018 Case Study 2: Legislated Exceptions SA in cohort for fall term. Uses final academic year exception to meet six-hour rule. After fall, SA leaves institution without graduating to pursue professional athletics opportunity. Is the SA eligible for automatic professional departure adjustment? No, SA did not meet the conditions of legislated exception. SA would be a 0/2. NCAA Bylaw 14.1.7.2.1.3

Case Study 3: Impermissible Financial Aid September 18, 2018 Case Study 3: Impermissible Financial Aid Freshman SA learns that SAT score is invalidated during fall term. Invalidated score makes SA a nonqualifier. SA impermissibly received athletics aid during fall term. Should SA be included in cohort? No, cohort should only include SAs who permissibly receive financial aid. APP Manual Appendix A Page No. 1

Delayed-Graduation Points September 18, 2018 Delayed-Graduation Points

Delayed-Graduation Point September 18, 2018 Delayed-Graduation Point “Bonus” point (1/0) awarded in term when former SA graduates. Restores lost APR point. Point received in sport(s) reported. May request for any year in current multiyear APR cohort. If lost point was adjusted, no delayed-graduation point may be awarded.

Delayed-Graduation Point September 18, 2018 Delayed-Graduation Point Former SA graduates from your institution during any year in the current multiyear cohort. Former SA not included in team’s cohort in term he/she graduated. Former SA lost a point in his/her last term in cohort or would have, but departed prior to implementation of APR in 2003-04.

September 18, 2018 Case Study 1 We transitioned to Division I four years ago. Former SA lost a point in her last term during the year prior to us reporting APR data. SA graduated in current year and cannot be included in cohort. Can we award SA a delayed-graduation point? Yes, SA graduated in current multiyear cohort, lost a point in last term and cannot be included in current cohort.

September 18, 2018 Case Study 2 We had a women’s golf SA who left our institution two years ago due to the incapacitating illness of her father. We had the retention point adjusted at that time. SA returned in Spring 2013 and graduated. Can we award SA a delayed-graduation point? No, since the lost point was adjusted, there is no lost point to restore.

September 18, 2018 Best Practices

Data Submission: Best Practices September 18, 2018 Data Submission: Best Practices Start early – when portal opens midsummer. Develop data submission calendar. Include multiple staff members to check for errors and develop institutional knowledge in case of turnover. Review sport reports with coaches for errors and possible adjustments/delayed-graduation points. Develop a tracking chart and share with registrar annually.

Data Submission: Best Practices September 18, 2018 Data Submission: Best Practices Delayed-graduation points: Use report feature in APP Data Collection Portal. Delayed-graduation points: Have flag for former SAs who return to institution in university student administration program (e.g., Banner, Peoplesoft). Delayed-graduation points: Develop outreach program to find former SAs who are interested in pursuing graduation.

Corrections and Adjustments September 18, 2018 Corrections and Adjustments

Correction vs. Adjustment? September 18, 2018 Correction vs. Adjustment? Correction Fix error or add new information. Documentation not required. May be requested for any year. Requested through APP Portal. Adjustment Request to discount lost eligibility or retention point. Must provide documentation. May be requested for any year in multiyear APR cohort. Requested through Legislative Services Database for the Internet Waiver Portal; processed by staff.

Case Study: Correction or Adjustment? September 18, 2018 Case Study: Correction or Adjustment? We incorrectly entered SA’s GPA. Correction. SA did not earn eligibility point, but suffered incapacitating illness during term. Adjustment. SA not awarded retention point, but qualified for a missed-term exception.

Automatic Adjustments September 18, 2018 Automatic Adjustments Documentation maintained on campus for: Allowable exclusions. 2.6 GPA transfer to another four-year institution. Professional athletics departure. Medical-absence waiver. Missed-term exception. APR Adjustment Directive

Adjustment Updates New academic portal. September 18, 2018 Adjustment Updates New academic portal. Significant increase in number of requests submitted during 2012-13. The Committee on Academic Performance approved education-impacting disability and international competition language updates to directive.

September 18, 2018 Adjustment Directive Mitigating circumstances surrounding SA must be beyond control of SA and/or institution. Contemporaneous documentation required. Approval of adjustment request removes lost points from numerator and denominator. APR Adjustment Directive

Common Issues Lack of contemporaneous documentation. September 18, 2018 Common Issues Lack of contemporaneous documentation. Mitigation did not “incapacitate” SA or prevent return to institution. Circumstances within control of SA/institution. Correction incorrectly submitted as adjustment. APR Adjustment Directive

September 18, 2018 Case Study 1 Facts: SA earned eligibility point in fall while suffering from a mental health disorder. SA sought treatment for disorder and did not return to institution in spring. Documentation: Transcript, letter from SA’s coach, letter from team physician confirming mental disorder diagnosis. Staff decision: Deny, insufficient documentation. Reconsideration: Letter from treating psychiatrist confirming SA sought treatment at conclusion of fall term and could not return to institution. Staff decision: Approve.

September 18, 2018 Case Study 2 Facts: SA falsified application to institution. Once discovered, SA was dismissed from institution. Documentation: Falsified application, police report, copy of institution’s policy, statement from institution. Staff decision: Deny, within control of SA.

Adjustment Best Practices September 18, 2018 Adjustment Best Practices

Adjustment Best Practices September 18, 2018 Adjustment Best Practices Keep a spreadsheet to track lost APR points as they occur. Obtain documentation when the SA leaves or has something impact academic performance. Review spreadsheet with coach, advisor, etc. – they may be aware of possible adjustments. Review lost points from previous cohorts to find possible adjustment requests.

September 18, 2018 Resources

NCAA staff: APP data reviews. GSR. September 18, 2018 NCAA staff: Greg Dana gdana@ncaa.org Maria DeJulio mdejulio@ncaa.org APP data reviews. GSR. Integrated Postsecondary-Education Data Systems. Corrections. Data-related issues.

NCAA staff: Data-related issues. September 18, 2018 NCAA staff: Anne Rohlman arohlman@ncaa.org Katy Yurk kyurk@ncaa.org Data-related issues. APR and GSR deadline extensions and reinstatement for championships. Requests for alternative definition of cohort. APR adjustments. Level-One, -Two and -Three penalties and postseason ineligibility waivers.

APP Table Hours Data/Waivers/Plans September 18, 2018 APP Table Hours Data/Waivers/Plans Day Time Wednesday 9 -11 a.m. 2 - 4 p.m. Thursday 1 - 4 p.m. Room: Atlanta - Cottonwood San Diego - Harbor E

September 18, 2018 Questions?

Institutional Best Practice Dialogue NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program Data Collection: Institutional Best Practice Dialogue Binh Nguyen Anne Rohlman