Andrew Jackson: 1832-1833.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sectionalism Industrial North (pro business, trade, and tariffs), Agrarian South (cash crops, slavery, anti-tariffs) Frontier West (cheap land, internal.
Advertisements

Essay Prompt: Analyze how tariffs led to the nullification crisis and the development of the states’ rights theory/debate. How was this disagreement settled?
Copy the following on the top 15 lines of NB p. 45.
Nullification Crisis:
Chapter 11 Sec. 1 Jackson Era.
Jackson’s Administration
The Nullification Crisis tariffs states’ rightsA crisis about tariffs and states’ rights State’s rights obey federalState’s rights – a theory that a state.
Constitutional Disputes and Crises
Jackson’s Administration
The Nullification Crisis Southern Response When Tariffs Get Too High.
NULLIFICATION CRISIS States Rights Vs. Federal Goverment.
ROAD TO CIVIL WAR MISSOURI COMPROMISE WHAT WAS THE CONCERN ABOUT ADMITTING MISSOURI AS A STATE? THE BALANCE BETWEEN SLAVE AND FREE STATES IN THE SENATE.
Unit 3B: The Nullification Crisis Unit 3B: Jacksonian Democracy US History I - Mr. Sularz Summit High School.
STATE RIGHTS VS FEDERAL AUTHORITY Nullification Crisis.
Age of Jackson Chapter 10. Election of 1824 John Quincy Adams vs. Andrew Jackson.
Unit 4: A Nation Divided Lesson 2: Tensions over Slavery and popular sovereignty.
Road to Civil War Slavery and the West p
Nullification & The Bank War APUSH - Spiconardi. Nullification  South Carolina was angered over the Tariff of 1828 and it’s increase in 1832  Feared.
Constitutional Disputes and Crises
Nullification Background Information write on back of Nullification graphic organizer Protective tariffs, tax on imported goods, had long been a topic.
The Tariff Debate (pages ) Explain in your own words what a tariff is. _______________________________________ Why did many northerners support.
Growing Sectionalism How did social and economic disparity contribute to the rise of sectionalism?
SC’s Secession from the Union Standard Indicator
Andrew Jackson and The Nullification Issue The Nullification Issue The Webster and Hayes Debate The Force Bill.
Andrew Jackson and the Nullification Crisis. WHY? Conflict over Tariffs North—wanted high tariffs South—did NOT want high tariffs.
Conflicts Over States Rights
THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE AND NULLIFICATION CRISIS.
Tariffs, 2 nd Bank and Secession  EQ: How did Jackson’s actions in reference to the idea of secession delay a civil war?
Unit 4: A Nation Divided Lesson 2: Tensions over Slavery and popular sovereignty.
Objectives Evaluate the significance of the debate over tariffs and the idea of nullification. Summarize the key events of the conflict over the second.
The Nullification Crisis
Objectives Evaluate the significance of the debate over tariffs and the idea of nullification. Summarize the key events of the conflict over the second.
Conflicts over States’ Rights
Lesson 2: Tensions over Slavery and popular sovereignty
Chapter 9 The Age of Jackson.
Growing Sectionalism How did social and economic disparity contribute to the rise of sectionalism?
CIVIL WAR SS8H6 The student will analyze the impact of the Civil War and Reconstruction on Georgia.
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Chapter 3 Section 2 Notes #22
Welcome Work In your ISN on a new page spread titled “Nullification Crisis”… Essential Question: How did Andrew Jackson handle the nullification crisis.
Jackson as President As suffrage continued by 1840 more than 80% of white males voted for president.
Nullification Crisis Sectionalism: Constitutional?
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Daily Quiz 1/5 Who does Jacksonian Democracy benefit most?
Jackson-the Nullification Crisis
Jackson Years.
Andrew Jackson and The Nullification Issue
Conflict over States’ Rights
The nullification crisis
November 1, 2018 University High APUSH.
NULLIFICATION CRISIS: CIVIL WAR AVERTED
NATIONALISM, SECTIONALISM, & THE AGE OF JACKSON
Sectionalism and the Civil War
Nullification Crisis Summary: Outcome: Tariff of 1824
The Nullification Crisis
Jackson Era 2.
Jackson’s Administration
Andrew Jackson and States’ Rights
Agenda 3/6 LEARNING TARGET History Day Presentations
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Question #1 Which precedent was established by the Supreme Court ruling in Marbury v. Madison? The federal government has the power to regulate trade.
Every Day is an Opportunity!
NATIONALISM, SECTIONALISM, & THE AGE OF JACKSON
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Thinking Questions: The Missouri Controversy
6.2 Political Conflict & Economic Crisis
12.2 Nullification Controversy
Chapter 11:1 & 11:2 The Jackson Era
Chapter 7 section 5 Review
Presentation transcript:

Andrew Jackson: 1832-1833

The “Tariff of Abominations”

Tariff Battles Tariff of 1816  on imports of cheap textiles. Tariff of 1824  on iron goods and more expensive woolen and cotton imports. Tariff of 1828  higher tariffs on imported raw materials [like wool & hemp]. The South alone was adamantly against it. As producers of the world’s cheapest cotton, it did not need a protective tariff. They were negatively impacted  American textiles and iron goods [or the taxed English goods] were more expensive! Dedicated to states’ rights, Jackson’s first term saw his efforts to uphold federal supremacy over states. The 1828 tariff, which raised taxes on imported goods, aroused opposition in the South, particularly in South Carolina, where it was called the “tariff of abominations.” Believing that the tariff punished southern consumers in order to benefit northern industry, South Carolina’s legislature threatened to nullify it, that is, to declare it null and void in South Carolina. South Carolina had a higher percentage of slaves than any other state and was ruled by an oligarchic elite of large plantation owners alarmed by the Missouri controversy and growing federal power. Indeed, the nullification crisis involved the fears of some slaveholders that the federal government might take action against slavery.

Votes in the House for the “Tariff of Abomination”

The Nullification Issue

1832 Tariff Conflict 1832 --> new tariff South Carolina’s reaction? Jackson’s response? Clay’s “Compromise” Tariff? Jackson’s vice-president, John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, developed a theory of nullification. In it (called “The South Carolina Exposition and Protest”) he argued that states had created the national government, and each state retained the right to prevent the enforcement of Congress’s laws within its border that seemed to exceed powers written in the Constitution. Opponents such as Daniel Webster argued that the people, not the states, had created the Constitution and the federal government, and that nullification was illegal, unconstitutional, and treasonous. While no other southern state threatened nullification, Calhoun’s theory offered the South a political philosophy to use when sectionalism intensified. Calhoun argued the theory did not threaten disunion but preserved it, allowing unique and diverse states to preserve their interests while remaining part of the federal union. To President Jackson, however, nullification was disunion. In 1832, when a new tariff was enacted, South Carolina declared it would be null and void the next year. In response, Jackson persuaded Congress to authorize him to use the military to collect the tariff in South Carolina (THIS WAS KNOWN AS THE “FORCE ACT” OR “FORCE BILL”).. To avoid war, Henry Clay, along with Calhoun, created a compromise tariff in 1833 that reduced duties. South Carolina rescinded the nullification law, and Calhoun abandoned his Democratic Party and Jackson for the Whigs and Clay and Webster, where they were united only by their hatred for Jackson. Andrew Jackson, dedicated to states’ rights and limited government, had defended the power of the federal government and the idea of the union against states’ rights.