How to Interpret the District Created Final Exam Teacher Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY2006 FCAT Results. Reading Grade 3 FCAT SSS Reading Percent Level 1 All Students Tested.
Advertisements

Infinite Campus Tutorial
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
Student Learning targets
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
Standards Based Report Card Standards Based Report Card.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
Third Grade Curriculum night WELCOME!!!!!
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Value Added Model Value Added Model. New Standard for Teacher EvaluationsNew Standard for Teacher Evaluations Performance of Students. At least 50% of.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Assessing LEP Students for English Language Proficiency
Provincial Assessment Results
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
Mark Howard, Chief Performance Accountability
Legislative Requirement 2013
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Introduction to Powerschool Gradebook and tienet
WOSIS Conference 25th May 2017 HAMILTON COLLEGE
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Connecticut’s Growth Model for the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments: English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics Hello. Thank you for listening.
Teacher SLTs
VAM Primer.
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Teacher SLTs
Student Growth Measurements and Accountability
The ACT and Pre-ACT Tests
Release of PARCC Student Results
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
PowerSchool for Parents
The Good The Bad & The Ugly Real-Life Examples of the SLO Assessment Report Form With Tips on How to Complete It August 21, 2012.
Growth Models Oklahoma
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
Connecticut’s Growth Model for the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments: English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics October 2016 Hello. Thank you.
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
How to Interpret the AP Teacher Report
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Third Grade Back to School Night
Standards-Based Grading
Understanding Learning Gains
Teacher SLTs
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
In the previous lesson, you studied the randomness of various sampling populations.  If you wanted to know the average height of the trees in a forest,
Teacher Evaluation and EVAAS
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Welcome to UNC-Chapel Hill
School Improvement Plan
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Tom Tomberlin Director, Educator Recruitment and Support
Teacher SLTs
Sign in Username- student ID
Michigan School Accountability Scorecards
Purpose of This Deck This slide deck is intended for use by site administrators to provide information to Parents about the California School Dashboard.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

How to Interpret the District Created Final Exam Teacher Report This is how the report will look.

The Top of the Report This is what you will see at the top of the report. This section provides multiple years of data score information (if applicable). This is the number that will go on the VAM/data score portion of the summative evaluation.

Body of the Report To see a specific course, click on the plus sign. To see all the courses, click on all of the plus signs. You can also “close” a course by clicking on the minus sign. This is also where you can see what percentage of the students used in your calculation met the Student Success Score (SSS).

Body of the Report (Full-Year Student) Here we are looking at the first student in the Pre-Calculus course. Full-year student - Refers to whether or not the student is considered to have been a full- year student. Only full-year students are included in the VAM/data score calculation, indicated with a ‘Y’. Full-year student rule (determined by the state DOE) - A student needs to be in the same school during survey period 2 (October) and survey period 3 (February). Please note that the rule doesn’t state that the student needs to have the same teacher for both surveys, rather that they need to be in the same school. The same full-year student rule is used for state- generated VAM, district-generated data scores and school grades.

Full-Year Student Example

Prior FSA Prior FCAT/FSA rule - We provide the prior FCAT/FSA level in the report to provide teachers information on the extent to which, if at all, the prior FCAT level was taken into account in the calculation. Please consult the formula for your specific type of test for more information. The weighting is as follows: The weighting provides protection for the teacher. The use of previous FCAT/FSA attempts to level the playing field between teachers whose students may have done less well on the FCAT and those whose students tended to score in the higher levels. The vast majority of courses use the most recent previous reading FCAT/FSA score for the student. Mathematics- based courses use the most recently available math FCAT/FSA. If a student does not have a previous FCAT/FSA score, he or she is not used in the calculation.

Attendance Rate Attendance Rate - The attendance rate is the percentage of time that the student was in school. We do not use number of days; rather the percentage of days the student was present. 170 out of 180 days = 94% or .94 We provide the attendance rate in the report to provide teachers information on the extent to which, if at all, the rate was taken into account in the calculation. Please consult the formula for your specific type of test for more information. Incorporating the attendance rate provides protection for the teacher. The use of the attendance rate attempts to level the playing field between teachers whose students tend to be absent more often and those whose students tend to have better attendance.

Weighting Factor The weighting factor is the combination of the prior FCAT level with the attendance rate. Weighting Factor = Weighting x Attendance Rate Please consult the formula for your specific type of test for more information. The weighting factor combines the various variables used in the formula into one number.

Final Exam Result DDA Result - Lets you know whether the student met the Student Success Score 1 = met Student Success Score (helps the teacher data score) 2 = did not meet the Student Success Score (does not help the teacher data score) X = There was no score for the student Please consult the formula for your specific type of test for more information.

Did the students listed as a 2 “Fail” the exam? 1 = met Student Success Score (cut mark) 2 = did not meet the Student Success Score (cut mark) X = There was no score for the student Did the students listed as a 2 “Fail” the exam? Not necessarily. It means they did not meet the Student Success Score (cut mark). To use the FCAT levels as an analogy, a level 2 FCAT student didn’t “fail,” but also isn’t considered proficient. A student who did not meet the Student Success Score simply did not meet the mark established for that particular test.

Student Percent Correct The student percent correct lets you know the percent correct that the student achieved on the final exam. The student percent correct should be used in combination with the test average score to figure out how close a student came to reaching the student success score, if they didn’t meet the score. It can also be used to see by how much the student exceeded the student success score, if they met or exceeded the test average score. NOTE: If you happen to teach a semester long course and have two different cohorts throughout the year, you may see two different test average scores, one for the winter cohort and one for the spring. NOTE: The Test Average score is the same as the Student Success Score (SSS)

I see an “X” in some boxes. What does that mean? If a student has an X in a box, that means that a piece of information for that student was not available. If a student has an X in the box for any column, he or she is not included in the calculation of the data score. X in the Prior FCAT column - There was no prior FCAT information available. Example: Student moved here from Georgia. If a student has an X in this column, he or she is not included in the calculation of the data score. X in the Weighting Factor column - Since a previous FCAT level was not available, no Weighting Factor could be calculated. If a student has an X in this column, he or she is not included in the calculation of the data score. X in the DDA Result column - There is no DDA result on file for the student. If a student has an X in this column, he or she is not included in the calculation of the data score.