By: Scott Heffelfinger, Gianna Chase, Austin Shawn, Max Brown

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health & High Volume Hydraulic Fracking Dr Carroll O’Dolan.
Advertisements

Non-Renewable - COAL Pros: Abundant supply Inexpensive High power yield Infrastructure already exists Can be changed to liquid or gas Cons: Nonrenewable.
Nonrenewable Energy Oil & Petroleum. Nonrenewable vs. Renewable? nonrenewablerenewableWhat is the difference between nonrenewable and renewable? net energyWhat.
Human Health Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid BTEX Components in Drinking Water Ashley Andersen, Nicole Fenton, Alex Friedman, Kevin Jackson, Alec.
Coal By: Josephine Latimer Jonathan Klosop Evan Sedor.
1. © 2013 Petroch Services Pty Ltd BP Version J11002– Occupational Hygiene in the Oil & Gas Industry Occupational Hygiene in the Oil & Gas Industry Day.
Fracking By Tuvia Reback. What is Fracking? Fracking Process that U.S. and other countries use to remove natural gas from shale rock pores deep underground.
Against Fracking in Monterey County HCOM 266 Presented by: Ashley Stout Duce Bell Kerry Kelvas Sophie Snow.
T HE H ALLIBURTON L OOPHOLE Team SALL-Z. F RACKING (Noun) the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc, so.
Environmental Health. Air Pollution Burning of fossil fuels producing sulfur dioxide, a yellowish brown gas Particulates in the air –Tiny solid particles.
Fracking 101. Fracking is a debated environmental and political issue. Industry’s insist it is a safe and economical source of clean energy; critics,
Renewable/Non-renewable Resources
SAFETY: Health and the Environment Ms. Mai Lawndale High School.
Hydraulic Fracturing Beau Greiner. Natural Gas The term “natural gas” generally refers to methane gas It is advertised as a “clean” fossil fuel The use.
Human Impact on Ecosystems
Pollution The Simpsons team.
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
AIM: What is fracking? Why is fracking such a controversial topic? DN: What do you know about fracking?
By Jason Wright and Bailey Simmons Period 5 FRACKING: ECONOMIC BENEFIT OR ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD?
Natural Gas and Fracking Aubrey Pacheco Rebecca Villalpando Danielle Miller.
Improve The Air We Breathe In. California’s Central Valley A large, flat valley that dominates the geographical center of California The Central Valley.
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is an innovative and cost-saving process for drilling oil and gas from rock formations far underground, and is a booming.
1. HUNTER-GATHERER SOCIETIES HAD VERY LIMITED ENERGY REQUIREMENTS. THESE WERE MET USING WOOD (A RENEWABLE RESOURCE). 2. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED.
GEOGRAPHY 12 Environmental Project 2010 Athabasca Tar Sands In 2006 the oil sands produced million barrels per day, 62% of Alberta's total oil production,
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
1 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT The conversion of energy from one form to another often affects the environment and the air we breathe in many ways, and thus.
Non-Renewable Energy Oil, Gas, and Coal
Emissions Information. Emissions Controls Hydrocarbons- A class of burned or partially burned fuel, hydrocarbons are toxins. – Prolonged exposure to hydrocarbons.
Non-renewable and Renewable Resources Coal, Nuclear, Natural Gas, Oil, Wood, Wind, Solar, Geothermal, Solar-Hydrogen.
Nonrenewable Energy Resources. Oil Rules!!! What is crude oil? Petroleum, or crude oil is a thick, gooey liquid consisting of many combustible hydrocarbons.
What is Fracking? Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high- pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the.
Let your voice be heard! Presentation by Sean Mullin Legislative Aide Delegate Shane Robinson District 39.
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
© Cengage Learning 2015 LIVING IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 18e G. TYLER MILLER SCOTT E. SPOOLMAN © Cengage Learning 2015 Nonrenewable Energy-Fossil Fuels.
THREE METHODS OF OBTAINING FUEL FROM THE EARTH 1)HARVESTING- PEAT, WOOD, CORN, SUGARCANE ARE USED FOR BIOMASS ENERGY GENERATION ARE USED FOR BIOMASS ENERGY.
Carbon, Climate, & Energy Resources Unit 4 Carbon Dioxide Production from Burning Fossil Fuels Pamela J. W. Gore, unit author.
Renewable/Non-renewable Resources
Air pollution OSH 320.
What the Frack Is Going On?
Fracking and its effect on the environment
Transportation and the Environment
TRADITIONAL ENERGY Key Vocabulary: -Energy -Wood -Oil -Coal Mining
Health and Safety Impacts of Natural Gas Compressor Stations
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON (PAH’S)
Module 35 Fossil Fuel Resources
Air Pollution in China.
Air pollution in new delhi, india
Impacts on the Atmosphere
Fossil Fuels.
Nonrenewable Energy Resources
Petroleum and Natural gas
Fossil Fuels.
Fracking: Health Effects
Disadvantages Lots of wind turbines are needed to produce enough power. Turbines can only be put in windy areas. It is not always windy. Some people don’t.
Women In STEM and the Science of Fracking
Nonrenewable Energy Resources
Natural Gas A Maryland Perspective
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers
Coal-Fired Power Plants
Coal-Fired Power Plants
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers
Hydraulic Fracking Luis Cano.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers On level
Nonrenewable Energy Resources
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers OL
Shale Gas = Methane Health Impacts
Non-Renewable Resources
IMPORTANT NOTE TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
Presentation transcript:

By: Scott Heffelfinger, Gianna Chase, Austin Shawn, Max Brown Fracking By: Scott Heffelfinger, Gianna Chase, Austin Shawn, Max Brown

WHAT IS ”FRACKING”? The process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc., so as to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas.

Why fracking is bad Fracking is to blame for the many health issues of those who live near fracking sights. People who live in areas that have a lot of gas and oil activity are said to be more prone to a plethora of health issues.

Health issues The health impacts of fracking include respiratory problems, birth defects, blood disorders, cancer and nervous system impacts. Workers and those who live near the wells are affected.

Respiratory issues Impacts include asthma attacks, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing and lung disease. Levels of pollutants high enough to cause respiratory problems have been found close to fracking sights and in areas with intense oil and gas activity. Workers are at risk of permanent lung damages caused by silica fracking sand.

Nervous system impacts Exposure to pollutants such as VOC’s and hydrogen sulfide cause neurological problems (Dizziness, headaches, seizures and loss of consciousness).  Many studies have measured benzene levels near fracking sites that are higher than the thresholds set to protect people from these impacts.

Birth Defects & Harm to the Developing Fetus VOC’s and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been found to interfere with a developing fetus. Harmful to the developing heart, brain and nervous system. Health experts have claimed this issue to be a threat to those who live near fracking sights.

Blood disorders Levels of benzene measured in studies were high enough to raise concern about internal organs. Harm to bone marrow and anemia if there were to be repeated exposure.

cancer Benzene, formaldehyde, diesel particulates and PAH’s are cancer causing pollutants found in fracking sights. Repeated exposure causes an increased risk of cancer.

Health issues Not only is our drinking water affected, the air is also contaminated. While the industry tries to keep the issue unnoticed, science continues to bring these health threats to light.

Leakage Natural gas is methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, and when you extract natural gas from shale formations, a portion of it leaks out. This leakage pollutes the air and drinking water. Some of the tap water has even turned bubbly and flammable, as a result of increased methane.

Why fracking is good At least 75 studies in the past 5 years have all concluded that methane emissions are falling. A recent study discovered that fracking has reduced carbon emissions by 20 percent. Whereas the costly development of solar and wind energy has only reduced the same emissions by roughly 1 percent. Fracking is better for the environment, as opposed to burning coal.

Not enough proof The Environmental Protection Agency’s advisory board debunked the claim that fracking contaminates drinking water. Stating that there was simply not enough scientific evidence to prove it.

Emissions have dropped America’s carbon emissions have dropped 800 million tons since 2007 and are back to the levels they were in in 1995. Fracking is a better solution to provide America it’s energy needs then oil or coal.

Coal vs. fracking Natural gas is better for the environment than burning coal. Burning coal releases three times more carbon emissions than natural gas. Fracking has improved emissions more than many other sustainable energy initiatives. Burning gas does not emit any lethal soot or sickening toxic metals.

Coal vs natural gas

Access to more gas and oil Fracking allows us access to natural deposits of gas that we were not able to reach before with other methods of extraction. Now gas can be accessed worldwide, causing a decrease in price, making it accessible to all.

Cost efficient Fracking reduces the cost of natural gases and helps stimulate a switch from coal to gas. Because fracking allows us more access to gas, it is becoming cheaper because of its abundance.

Health benefits Increasing reliance on natural gas, as opposed to coal, is creating public health benefits, as the burning of natural gas produces fewer harmful particles in the air. 

Drinking water not affected It is said to be highly unlikely that well-run drilling operations are creating cracks that allow chemicals to reach surface water supplies.  Drinking water and oil and gas deposits are at very different levels in the ground. Research has found that between 2008 and 2011, only a handful of major incidents happened across more than 3,500 wells.

employment With the increase in production of natural gas, the number of people employed also skyrocketed, meaning more are on health insurance policies. The increase in use of fracking technology has seen 67% rise in employment. 118,400 in 2003 to 198,400 by 2012.

Improvement Over the course of time, mistakes have taught workers what to do and what not to do while fracking. It has become better and safer over time.

Conclusion / Opinion Fracking has become a necessity within the U.S. and countries like it, but not much research was done on it’s future effects. Although natural gas fracking can greatly benefit the occasionally struggling farmer, it’s not worth condemning the overall health of the neighboring communities. Further expansion of drill sites and pipeline construction should be greatly hampered until further research can be conducted on the detrimental health impacts that could be imposed by such activities.

Google images https://goo.gl/images/i9pq1F https://goo.gl/images/vw9VK2 https://goo.gl/images/MhyLZK https://goo.gl/images/nomAEF https://goo.gl/images/G8qHTL https://goo.gl/images/r91wXK https://goo.gl/images/JacfR1 https://goo.gl/images/Gy95gZ https://goo.gl/images/UhZuhU https://goo.gl/images/VF7bze https://goo.gl/images/LtfriC https://goo.gl/images/Vp5KvX

Websites used https://www.nrdc.org/media/2014/141216 http://thefederalist.com/2016/08/24/obama-energy-czar- actually-fracking-is-pretty-good-for-the-environment/ http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/09/fracking- good-environment/# https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2015/05/pros-and- cons-of-fracking-5-key-issues/