Using Friendly Controversy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identifying Critical Information
Advertisements

Noticing When Students are Not Engaged
Demonstrating Intensity and Enthusiasm Design Question 5 - Element 29: How do you demonstrate intensity and enthusiasm for the content in a variety of.
Presenting Unusual or Intriguing Information Design Question 5 - Element 32: How do you use unusual or intriguing information about the content in a manner.
Maintaining a Lively Pace Design Question 5 – Element 28.
Using Homework Design Question 3 – Element 16: How do teachers design homework to deepen their students’ knowledge of informational content or, practice.
Using Academic Games Design Question 5 – Element 25.
Organizing Students to Practice and Deepen Knowledge
Organizing Students to Practice and Deepen Knowledge
Understanding Students’ Interests and Background
Focus Element Identifying Critical Content
Displaying Objectivity and Control
Managing Response Rates
Practicing Skills, Strategies, and Processes
Examining Similarities and Differences
Previewing New Content
Displaying Objectivity and Control
Focus Element Helping Students Elaborate on New Content
Chunking Content into Digestible Bites
Maintaining a Lively Pace
Asking Questions of Low Expectancy Students
Managing Response Rates
Communicating Value and Respect for Low Expectancy Students
Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Helping Students Practice Skills, Strategies, and Processes
Asking Questions of Low Expectancy Students
Providing Resources and Guidance for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Understanding Students’ Interests and Background
Probing Incorrect Answers with Low Expectancy Students
Using Friendly Controversy
Organizing Students to Interact with New Content
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
Design Question 3 – Element 20:
Design Question 8 - Element 37:
Using Physical Movement
Helping Students Process New Information
Design Question 3 – Element 14
Helping Students Examine Similarities and Differences
Acknowledging Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Elaborating on New Information
Using Physical Movement
Tracking Student Progress
Providing Opportunities for Students to Talk about Themselves
Examining Similarities and Differences
Helping Students Reflect on Learning
Design Question 3 – Element 16
Helping Students Record and Represent Knowledge
Recording and Representing Knowledge
Demonstrating Intensity and Enthusiasm
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Previewing New Content
Using Academic Games Design Question 5 - Element 25:
Focus Element Helping Students Record and Represent Knowledge
Applying Consequences for Lack of Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Demonstrating “Withitness”
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Helping Students Revise Knowledge
Chunking Content into “Digestible Bites”
Applying Consequences for Lack of Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Reflecting on Learning
Presenting Unusual or Intriguing Information
Identifying Critical Content
Establishing Classroom Routines
Noticing When Students are Not Engaged
Probing Incorrect Answers with Low Expectancy Students
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Helping Students Elaborate on New Content
Acknowledging Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Processing New Information
Presentation transcript:

Using Friendly Controversy Design Question 5 - Element 30: How do you use friendly controversy to maintain student engagement?

Before we begin… Before we begin talking about element 30, let’s be sure there is an understanding about how the elements in Design Question 5 are related. This is important as you plan your lessons. While watching the below video, please take notes about how the elements in Design Question 5 are related. Click here for the video.

How are the elements in Design Question 5 related to each other? After watching the video, you should have noticed that all of the elements have one common goal and that is to engage students in the learning process. Each element provides a different tactic for meeting the same goal. We hope you also noticed that while all of these elements are contained under the category “Enacted on the Spot”, student engagement can and should be planned for in advance. However, you will still need to read your students and apply some of these strategies as you notice the overall energy of the group becoming low. Now, let’s talk about element 30, specifically.

Review Teacher and Student Evidence NOTE: This list of evidence is not all inclusive but is instead a list of possible examples.

Review Scale for Element 30

Desired Effect in the Students The desired effect is, “students cognitively engage or re-engage as a result of the use of friendly controversy.” To receive an Innovating rating, the teacher must monitor and make accommodations so that every student in their classroom achieves this desired effect.

Let’s Begin with the Basics First we need a complete understanding of element 30, using friendly controversy. As you watch the below video, jot down notes that will help you form a definition of friendly controversy. This understanding will go a long way in helping you to successfully implement element 30 in your classroom. Click here for the video. Note: You will only need to watch from the 4 minute and 45 second mark to the end in order to learn about using friendly controversy in the classroom.

Video Question Q: What is friendly controversy? A: The main components of friendly controversy are introducing a topic about which students have differing opinions. The students should seek to explain and defend their stance in a FRIENDLY way. These interactions will need to be monitored to ensure that students are displaying respect for one another and that there is an emphasis on the ideas or opinions and not the person who holds that view. There are many different strategies for incorporating friendly controversy into the classroom.

Task While watching the below video, please identify how the teacher is using friendly controversy as he is interacting with the students. After watching the video you will be asked to identify the teacher and student evidence to rate the teacher on this element. Click here for the video. If the hyperlink doesn’t work, please log into www.effectiveeducators.com and then copy/paste this link: https://www.effectiveeducators.com/resource/show/4e2d8e535d17508eb10898b4.

Video Question Q: How is this teacher using friendly controversy as he is interacting with his students? A: This teacher has asked his students to look at the solution to a math problem and rate it based on a scale that they are using in class. The students worked in pairs to determine where they would rate the solution on the scale. They are asked to present their rating, using evidence to back it up. As the students are taking their stance, the teacher is asking probing questions and pushing them to take a second look at the scale to determine whether spelling is a part of the rating.

Task On the next slide is the teacher and student evidence. What evidence did you see and were able to document? Use this to rate the teacher as you walk through the next few slides.

Review Teacher and Student Evidence What did you see?

Review Teacher and Student Evidence What did we see?

How to Rate Teacher and Student Evidence You can only give credit for what you see. Teacher structures mini-debates about the content. The teacher engaged in a mini-debate with the pair of students featured on the video. Teacher elicits different opinions on content from members of the class. The teacher has the students organized in groups and each group is prepared to present their assessment of where the solution should be rated on the scale. Students engage in friendly controversy activities with enhanced engagement. The students all appear to be engaged in listening to the debate between the teacher and the students as evidenced by their posture and eyes focused at the front of the classroom.

Review Scale for Element 30

How we Rated the Teacher This teacher earned an Applying rating for element 30. The teacher used friendly controversy techniques to maintain student engagement and monitored the majority of students for evidence of the effect. He does this by scanning the room consistently, as well as having each of the groups present their rating with evidence. He did not receive an Innovating rating because there is no evidence on the video that the teacher adapted or created new strategies for unique student needs and situations in order for the desired effect to be present in all students. The good news is that your evaluator will be able to see everything that is taking place in your classroom and talk to both you and your students!

What is next? First, start with a self-evaluation. What teacher and/or student evidence can you identify for element 30 in your classroom? What rating do you think you would receive on the scale for this element? Now that you have determined where you rate on the scale, take some time to identify what you need to change or improve upon in order to grow to a higher rating on the scale. The resources on the following slide may be useful in helping you to get started.

Additional Resources Log into www. effectiveeducators Additional Resources Log into www.effectiveeducators.com to access the first two resources. Strategies for Using Friendly Controversy This article provides several different ideas for incorporating friendly controversy in your lessons. If the hyperlink doesn’t work, copy/paste the link: https://www.effectiveeducators.com/attachment/show/502bf899e4b0eaed9d1bfc7f Video of a 7th grade math class example: https://www.effectiveeducators.com/resource/show/4e2d8ed15d17508eb10899e9 How to: Close the Achievement Gap by Seeking Multiple Perspectives Prezi presentation about how to execute friendly controversy efficiently into a classroom

Is this element in your PGP? Then you need to… sign into www.effectiveeducators.com. Click on the Growth tab and then click on the Plans option. Open your current plan and fill out a new Reflection Log, answering the appropriate questions. decide how you will change your teaching as a result of viewing this module. execute your change, reflect on its impact, and fill out another Reflection Log in iObservation.

Further questions? Here are resources in case you have further questions: Your evaluator Another evaluator on your campus Your school’s classroom practice mentor (CPM)