H. Anthony Chan, h.a.chan@ieee.org Unified framework and DMM gap analysis draft-chan-dmm-framework-gapanalysis H. Anthony Chan, h.a.chan@ieee.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2009 Enhancing Dynamic Cloud-based Services using Network Virtualization F. Hao, T.V. Lakshman, Sarit Mukherjee, H.
Advertisements

Deployment of Existing Mobility Protocols in DMM Scenario draft-liu-dmm-practice-of-deployment-00 draft-chan-dmm-framework-gap-analysis-05.
Why do current IP semantics cause scaling issues? −Today, “addressing follows topology,” which limits route aggregation compactness −Overloaded IP address.
MIP Extensions: FMIP & HMIP
1Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date University of Twente On the Security of the Mobile IP Protocol Family Ulrike Meyer and Hannes Tschofenig.
Mobile IPv6 趨勢介紹 1. Mobile IP and its Variants Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) – MIPv4 – Low-Latency Handover for MIPv4 (FMIPv4) – Regional Registration for MIPv4.
Distributed mobility management in the context of the MEDIEVAL project MEVICO Final Seminar, part 2 23 rd November 2012 Carlos J. Bernardos, UC3M
IPv4 and IPv6 Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP draft-berzin-malis-mpls-mobility-00 Oleg Berzin, Andy Malis {oleg.berzin,
DMM Framework based on Functional Elements draft-liebsch-dmm-framework-analysis-02 M. Liebsch, P. Seite, G. Karagiannis IETF88, Vancouver DMM WG 08 th.
Protocol for Hiding Movement of Mobile Nodes in Mobile IPv6 draft-qiu-mip6-hiding-movement-00.txt F. BAO, R. DENG, J. Kempf, Y. QIU and J.Y ZHOU.
81st IETF, Quebec Citydraft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 A PMIPv6-based solution for Distributed Mobility Management draft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 Carlos.
1 MIPv6 CN-Targeted Location Privacy and Optimized Routing draft-weniger-mobopts-mip6-cnlocpriv-01 IETF #68, Prague, March 2007.
Multimob possible future work I’: dmm multicast D. von Hugo Contributions from S. Figueiredo, S. Jeon, D. Liu IETF-83, Paris 1.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Distributed Mobility Management using IEEE Date Submitted: March 16, 2011.
Seamless Handover Scheme for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Ju-Eun Kang, LGDACOM CORPORATION/Research Institute of Technology, Korea Dong-Won Kum, Yang Li, and You-Ze.
1 Motorola PMIPv4 Call Flows: Bearer Setup with Dual Anchoring Parviz YeganiVojislav VuceticAlmon Tang (408) (732) (847)
AERO DHCPv6 Control Messaging IETF91 – Honolulu, HI Fred L.Templin
1 Evaluation of PMIPv6 Base Multicast Support Drafts Stig Venaas Behcet Sarikaya November 2009 Multimob WG IETF 76.
1 NetLMM Vidya Narayanan Jonne Soininen
PMIPv6 Route Optimization Protocol draft-qin-mipshop-pmipro-00.txt Alice Qin Andy Huang Wenson Wu Behcet Sarikaya.
The limitation in current NEMO scenario -Problem Statement draft-zhao-nemo-limitations-ps-00.txt John.zhaoJohn.zhao(Huawei technology shanghai R&D) Ke.
Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement Speaker: Jong-Ru Lin
Simultaneous Location in Home and Foreign in Monami6 65 th IETF at Dallas, Texas, USA Benjamin Koh Keigo Aso.
IETF#83 Multimob DMM Proposal Summary Dapeng Liu China Mobile 1.
1 Route Optimization and Location Privacy using Tunneling Agents (ROTA) draft-weniger-rota-01 Kilian Weniger, Takashi Aramaki IETF #64, Nov 2005.
Network Mobility (NEMO) Advanced Internet 2004 Fall
21-07-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Network based Distributed Mobility Approach Date Submitted: July,
2003/3/1856th IETF NEMO WG1 Basic Network Mobility Support draft-wakikawa-nemo-basic-00.txt Ryuji Wakikawa Keisuke Uehara
Network Mobility Support using Mobile MAG in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Domain draft-sijeon-netext-mmag-pmip-00.txt Seil Jeon (Presenter), Behcet Sarikaya, Rui.
IP Multicast Use Cases and Analysis over Distributed Mobility Management draft-sfigueiredo-multimob-use-case-dmm-03.txt Sérgio Figueiredo, Seil Jeon (Presenter),
Multicast Routing Optimization Juan-Carlos Zúñiga Luis M. Contreras Carlos J. Bernardos Seil Jeon Younghan Kim MULTIMOB WG, July
IP Address Location Privacy and Mobile IPv6: Problem Statement draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-PS-00.txt Rajeev Koodli.
: MobileIP. : r Goal: Allow machines to roam around and maintain IP connectivity r Problem: IP addresses => location m This is important for efficient.
IETF-70 in Vancouver1 STANDARDIZATION OF SOLUTIONS Behcet Sarikaya Huawei Research.
Service Flows Distribution and Handoff Technique based on MIPv6 draft-liu-dmm-flows-distribution-and-handoff-00
Distributed Mobility Management: Current Practices and Gap Analysis draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 Dapeng Liu (Editor) – Presenting Juan.
th IETF NEMO WG 1 NEMO RO Problem Space Prepared for 55 th IETF By Pascal Thubert (Cisco), Ng Chan Wah & Takeshi Tanaka (Panasonic)
Mobility With IP, implicit assumption that there is no mobility. Addresses -- network part, host part -- so routers determine how to get to correct network.
1 IPv6 and Mobile IPv6 For Mobile Networks Hesham Soliman Director, Elevate Technologies Octorber 2012.
Network-based Localized Mobility Management
V4 traversal for IPv6 mobility protocols - Scenarios Mip6trans Design Team MIP6 and NEMO WGs, IETF 63.
Distributed Mobility Management for Future 5G Networks : Overview and Analysis of Existing Approaches IEEE Wireless Communications January 2015 F. Giust,
Booting up on the Home Link
Networking Applications
Route Optimization of Mobile IP over IPv4
Network layer Jarkom Dasar – Week 6 Aisyatul Karima, 2012.
An IPv6 Distributed Client Mobility Management approach using existing mechanisms draft-bernardos-mext-dmm-cmip-00 Carlos J. Bernardos – Universidad Carlos.
Mobile IP and Upper Layer Interaction
Mobility in a Dual Stack Internet
Support for Flow bindings in MIPv6 and NEMO
Fast Handover for Multicast in Proxy Mobile IPv6
with distributed anchor routers
IETF67 B. Patil, Gopal D., S. Gundavelli, K. Chowdhury
2002 IPv6 技術巡迴研討會 IPv6 Mobility
DMM Requirements draft-ietf-dmm-requirements
Enhanced Mobility Anchoring
Delivery and Routing of IP Packets
Carlos J. Bernardos – Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: March 21, 2013 Presented at IEEE session.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: September 22, 2011 Presented at IEEE session.
IETF-100, MPTCP WG, November 2017
A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network Fred L. Templin IETF101 Routing Working Group.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: November 10, 2011 Presented at IEEE session.
NETLMM 및 IETF 이동성기술 표준화 동향
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
Mobile IP Outline Homework #4 Solutions Intro to mobile IP Operation
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Network-based and Client-based DMM solutions using Mobile IP mechanisms draft-bernardos-dmm-cmip-07 draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-08 draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-09.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: July 21, 2011 Presented at IEEE session.
Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6
Presentation transcript:

H. Anthony Chan, h.a.chan@ieee.org Unified framework and DMM gap analysis draft-chan-dmm-framework-gapanalysis H. Anthony Chan, h.a.chan@ieee.org

Abstract the functions of MIP family Mobility routing (MR) function: to intercept packets to/from the HoA of a mobile node and to forward the packets, based on the internetwork location information, either to the destination (or to some other network element that knows how to forward to the destination). Home address allocation: allocate the home network prefix or HoA to a MN. Location management (LM) function: to manage and to keep track of the internetwork location of a MN, which includes a mapping of the HoA to the routing address of the MN (or of another network element that knows how to forward packets towards the MN). one (or more) proxy may exist between LM and MN so that the LM function is maintained in the hierarchy LM-proxy-MN.

Unified framework REQ5: Considering existing protocols first Abstracting existing protocol functions is a way to see how to maximize the use of existing protocols REQ4 (part 2): Compatibility Different deployments using the same abstract functions can be compatible with each other REQ3: IPv6 deployment Functions are abstracted from MIPv6 and PMIPv6 Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP)

Network-based versus Host-based IP layer of the protocol stack are comparable Packet from CN: no difference other than treating the MAG-MN combination in PMIP as MN in MIP a. MIP IP(HoA) IP(CoA) CN HA MN b. PMIP MA MAG

Unified framework MIP LM, MR, and HoA allocation in home network only Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ6: Security: Trust between MN and MR LM, MR, and HoA allocation in home network only network1 network3 network2 LM1 HoA1 alc IP3 alc IP2 alc MR1 HoA11 MN11 IP32,HoA11 CN21 host-based

Unified framework PMIP Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ6: Security: Trust between AR and MR, in addition LM, MR, and HoA allocation in home network only network1 network3 network2 LM1 HoA1 alc IP3 alc IP2 alc MR1 HoA11 AR31 MN21 IP31 IP32 MN11 CN21 HoA11 network-based Client-based or network-based

Unified framework HMIP Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ6: Security Trust between MR’s, in addition LM, MR, and HoA allocation in home network LM proxy, MR in visited network network1 network3 network2 LM1 HoA1 alc IP3 alc IP2 alc LM MR MR MR1 MR3 HoA11 AR31 MN11 IP31 IP32,HoA11 MN MN MN31 CN21 network-based or host-based

Unified framework Multiple home networks Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ1 (part 1): Distributed deployment (part 2) avoiding non-optimal routes (part 1) May deploy functions in each network (part 2 later) LM, MR, and HoA allocation in each network network1 network3 network2 LM1 LM3 LM2 HoA1 alc HoA3 alc HoA2 alc MR1 MR3 MR2 HoA11 AR31 MN11 IP31 IP32,HoA11 MN31 CN21 network-based or host-based

Unified framework HAHA Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) HAHA as a possible DMM solution Requires signaling between different LM’s LM=LM1+LM3+LM2 network1 network3 network2 LM LM LM HoA1 alc HoA3 alc HoA2 alc MR1 MR3 MR2 HoA11 AR31 MN11 IP31 IP32,HoA11 MN31 CN21 network-based or host-based

Unified framework LM, MR, and HoA allocation in each network Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ2: Providing mobility support dynamically Home network and HoA was associated with MN. Need to associate instead with an application of the MN (which may have multiple applications) LM, MR, and HoA allocation in each network network1 network3 network2 LM1 LM3 LM2 HoA1 alc HoA3 alc HoA2 alc MR1 MR3 MR2 HoA11 AR31 MN11 IP31 IP32,HoA11 MN31 CN21 network-based or host-based Details in draft-liu-dmm-dynamic-anchor-discussion; see also draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip; draft-sarikaya-dmm-dmipv6

Unified framework Logical Functions (abstracted MIP/PMIP): 1. MR: Mobility routing (data plane) 2. HoA allocation 3. LM: Location management (control plane) 4. Proxy (HMIP) REQ1 (part 1): Distributed deployment (part 2) avoiding non-optimal routes (part 1) Deploy functions in each network (part 2) May generalize the LM’s into a distributed database. MR may cache the LM information (part 2) Need MR in CN’s network to optimize the route REQ6: Security Trust between MR and LM, in addition Location management: control plane is supported by hierarchical and distributed database network1 network3 network2 LM1 LM3 LM2 HoA1 alc HoA3 alc HoA2 alc MR1 MR3 MR2 HoA11 AR31 MN11 IP31 IP32,HoA11 MN31 CN21 network-based or host-based