RAPID EVALUATION METHOD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Systems Approach To Training
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Conducting the Community Analysis. What is a Community Analysis?  Includes market research and broader analysis of community assets and challenges 
1 ECOTOURISM CONFERENCE Ecotourism conference 2012 Theme: Integrating Ecotourism Practices For The Modern Traveler Dates :20 th -22 nd February 2012 Venue.
Data Use: How to Write a PLACE Report Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 4a – Qualitative Data Collection.
Educational Research: Action Research in Schools
Evaluation tools. Content Interview Focus group Interview are the main methods for collecting data in qualitative research. more structured the questions.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Evaluation Methods.
Step 4: Gather Evidence Luann D’Ambrosio, MEd. Review: What to measure What amount of $ and time were invested What did the program actually consist of.
Research Methods in Psychology (Pp 1-31). Research Studies Pay particular attention to research studies cited throughout your textbook(s) as you prepare.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Undertaking Research for Specific Purposes.
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
Rapid Assessment Process RAP James Beebe Gonzaga University 2002.
Chapter 5 Job Analysis.
Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues. What are qualitative methods of assessment? Qualitative methods of assessment are those whose results.
Chapter 11: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Design
Incorporating an Evaluation Plan into Program Design: Using Qualitative Data Connie Baird Thomas, PhD Linda H. Southward, PhD Colleen McKee, MS Social.
Methods: Pointers for good practice Ensure that the method used is adequately described Use a multi-method approach and cross-check where possible - triangulation.
Introduction to research methods 10/26/2004 Xiangming Mu.
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
Paradigms/Research Traditions “Instead of asking, how can this be true? We could ask, what if this were true? What then?” (Bochner, 2000, p. 267)
Chapter Nine: Qualitative Procedures
SITUATION ASSESSMENT FOR HIV PROGRAMMING DR. S.K CHATURVEDI DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI.
Definition of indicators Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.
Pharmacy in Public Health: Community Health Course, date, etc. info.
Strengthening Impact Evaluation for FSW Interventions through Surveillance-linked Triangulated Evaluation in Bangladesh Bangladesh AIDS Program USAID /
1 Presentation by I.D. PRASAD Chief Consultant (Corporate Development) APITCO Limited 8 th Floor, Parisrama Bhavanam, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. Ph: ,
THE RESEARCH PROCESS. STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM The first step in the process is to identify a problem or develop a research question. The research.
Draft findings VFM of MY
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Part Two.
High HIV prevalence among drug injecting female sex workers in Viet Nam: The need to reduce both sexual and injection risks in this vulnerable population.
Methods of Science Chapter 1 Section 3.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Chapter 2 Sociological Research Methods.
Lisa Brun Western Kentucky University
Qualitative research: an overview
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 43
APHA 135th Annual Meeting and Expo November 3-7, 2007 Washington, DC
Social Network Strategy Quality Assurance Evaluation Tool
PROJECT SCOPE MANAGEMENT
Chapter 2 Sociological Research Methods
Introducing Evaluation
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
By: Myat Sandi Aung, Euis Ratna Gumilang, Thu Zar Myint
Safety Culture Self-Assessment Methodology
Design Methodology Desi Dwi Kristanto, M.Ds. Week 6.
Evaluation tools.
Evaluating Qualitative Research
Dr Amina Rashad and Dr Nahed Kandeel
Module 8- Stages in the Evaluation Process
Types of Research in Sociology
Incorporating NVivo into a Large Qualitative Project
Chapter 14 Evaluation in Healthcare Education
PROJECT SCOPE MANAGEMENT
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Participatory Rural Appraisal.
Seminar DKV Desi Dwi Kristanto, M.Ds. Week 6.
Writing Instructional Objectives
Dr Amina Rashad and Dr Nahed Kandeel
Focus Group Discussion
Focus Group Methodology
The Processes of Science
Case studies: interviews
Root Cause Analysis Identifying critical campaign challenges and diagnosing bottlenecks.
Presentation transcript:

RAPID EVALUATION METHOD Dr. Nugroho Susanto, SKM, M.Kes

Introduction Elemen of rapid evaluation Method evaluation

ELEMEN RAPID EVALUATION Speed Teamwork Triangulation Practicality Local participation

Speed As mentioned earlier, RE can dramatically shorten the research time frame from months to weeks without sacrificing data accuracy and reliability. Schadule of program evaluation

Teamwork Working in teams not only speeds up data collection but also facilitates the necessary discussion and analysis of findings as they emerge. Solidarity team work Job description of time work

Triangulation Using a mix of complementary qualitative and quantitative methods and multiple data ources increases the validity and reliability of data. Key Informant FGD (focus group discussion) Direc observation

Practicality Rapid assessments are specific and narrowly targeted to produce useful recommendations for local interventions. RE is designed to be practical in that its scope is narrowed to a specific set of topics that directly inform the intervention

Local participation Rapid assessments rely on local participants’ involvement and guidance to access knowledge and beliefs and assure community ownership A major aspect of rapid assessment and evaluation is active and meaningful community participation.

Method triangulation

METHOD EVALUATION Key informant interviews Focus group discussions Social mapping Direct observation

Key informant interviews interviews with community experts. Example : for HIV and AIDS, are from the most vulnerable groups, such as sex workers, injection drug users, and long-distance truck drivers. They often have critical, first-hand information that program professionals do not have

Focus group discussions Discussion between several people on a particular topic guided by a facilitator usually have 6 to 12 participants and a moderator, and are used to gather data on a particular topic.

Social mapping exercise where interviewees are asked to draw a map of a particular place, and to indicate the location of certain features. is a favorite method among many rapid evaluators, and is highly useful for identifying HIV “hotspots” and hidden populations

Direct observation observation of a component of the program being evaluated. is often triangulated with focus group discussion and key informant interview data to compare observed behavior with stated behavior— in other words, what people actually do is compared with what they say they do.

Note of evaluation basic The five basic characteristics of RE are speed, teamwork, triangulation, practicality, and local participation. RE is an iterative process that greatly reduces the time it takes to collect and analyze data and reportfindings. Teamwork is essential to its success because the iterative process relies on continuous, intensive rounds of data collection and analysis in which findings are integrated into ongoing investigative procedures

THANK YOU