The Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Average Cholesterol Levels Frank M. Sacks, M.D., Marc A. Pfeffer,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress in Vascular Anesthesiology Donald M. Voltz, M.D. Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals of.
Advertisements

US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Pexelizumab for the Reduction of Infarction and Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft ll (PRIMO-CABG II) Trial Presented at The American College of.
Statin Landmark Trials Across the Spectrum of Risk: Secondary CV Prevention.
Gemfibrozil for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Men with Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol VA-HIT Rubins, HB, et.
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk.
Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial Michael Miller MD,
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
Cholesterol and Lipids TIPS Wokefield Park 15/5/2013.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia James Shepherd, M.D., Stuart M. Cobbe, M.D., Ian Ford, Ph.D., Christopher.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
TC LDL- C HDL- C Nonfatal MI/CHD death CHD death All- cause mortality *As compared to placebo. † P= CARE: Effect of Lipid Lowering on Lipid Values.
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
Lipid Lowering Substudy Trial of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288: ALLHAT- LLT.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Type 2 diabetes mellitus Men and women.
Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Trial (BIP) Results Presented at the European Society of Cardiology Meeting Vienna, Austria 1998.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) The Lancet, Vol 344, November 19, 1994.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
OVERALL SURVIVAL Adapted from Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Lancet 1994;344: % of patients alive Simvastatin (n=2221)
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Landmark clinical trials with pravastatin WOS CARE LIPID.
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
AA-2-1 Jerome D. Cohen, MD, FACC, FACP Professor of Internal Medicine / Cardiology Director, Preventive Cardiology Programs St. Louis University Health.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
SPARCL – Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP with Specialist Interest in Diabetes and.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
FOURIER Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk
Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The PEACE Trial Torbjørn Omland, MD, PHD, MPH, Marc S.
Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial Michael Miller MD,
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
FATS- Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study
TNT: Baseline and final LDL cholesterol levels
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
LRC-CPPT and MRFIT Content Points:
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Characteristics of included studies
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics by Primary End Point
Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Average Cholesterol Levels Frank M. Sacks, M.D., Marc A. Pfeffer, M.D., Ph.D., Lemuel A. Moye, M.D., Ph.D., Jean L. Rouleau, M.D., J. Malcolm O. Arnold, M.D., Chuan-Chuan Wun, Ph.D., Barry Davis, M.D., Ph.D., Eugene Braunwald, M.D., for the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Study Design Secondary prevention of CHDSecondary prevention of CHD 80 centers in the US and Canada80 centers in the US and Canada 4159 men and women aged 21 to 75 enrolled4159 men and women aged 21 to 75 enrolled 3 to 20 months post-MI3 to 20 months post-MI Total-C < 240; LDL-C between 115 and 174; Triglycerides < 350 mg/dLTotal-C < 240; LDL-C between 115 and 174; Triglycerides < 350 mg/dL 5 yr Treatment with Pravastatin 40 mg vs. placebo5 yr Treatment with Pravastatin 40 mg vs. placebo Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Study Endpoints Primary:Primary: –CHD death or nonfatal MI Secondary:Secondary: –CHD death Tertiary:Tertiary: –Total Mortality Others:Others: –Fatal MI, nonfatal MI, PTCA, CABG, Stroke Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Baseline Characteristics 86% male; 14% female86% male; 14% female Mean age 59 ± 9 yearsMean age 59 ± 9 years 93% white93% white 21% current smoker21% current smoker 42% hypertensive42% hypertensive 14% diabetic14% diabetic Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Baseline Characteristics Mean 10 ± 5 months post-MIMean 10 ± 5 months post-MI 54% had prior PTCA / CABG54% had prior PTCA / CABG 83% taking aspirin83% taking aspirin 41% taking -blockers41% taking -blockers 40% taking calcium antagonists40% taking calcium antagonists 15% taking ACEIs15% taking ACEIs Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

Lipids at Baseline Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335: Plasma LipidPlaceboPravastatin (n=2078)(n=2081) Cholesterol (mg/dL) Total Total VLDL2727 VLDL2727 LDL LDL HDL3939 HDL3939 Triglycerides (mg/dL)155156

Percent LDL Reduction on Treatment P < for all comparisons Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

Fatal CHD or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (Primary Endpoint) Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335: % Risk Reduction p = 0.003

Coronary Bypass Surgery or Angioplasty 27% Risk Reduction p<0.001 Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Achievement of Endpoints Primary: CHD death or nonfatal MIPrimary: CHD death or nonfatal MI –24% reductionp = Secondary: CHD deathSecondary: CHD death –20% trend to reductionp = 0.10 (ns) Tertiary: Total MortalityTertiary: Total Mortality –9% trend to reductionp = 0.37 (ns) Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Achievement of Endpoints Fatal MIFatal MI –37% reduction (p=0.07) Nonfatal MINonfatal MI –23% reduction (p=0.02) Combined MI endpointsCombined MI endpoints –25% reduction (p=0.002) Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335: CABG/PTCA/CombinedCABG/PTCA/Combined –26% reduction (p=0.005) PTCAPTCA –23% reduction (p=0.01) Combined CABG/PTCACombined CABG/PTCA –27% risk reduction (p<0.001) Other: StrokeOther: Stroke –31% reduction (p=0.03)

CARE - Observations Fatal CHD + nonfatal MI + CABG + PTCAFatal CHD + nonfatal MI + CABG + PTCA –Women vs. Men: 46% vs. 20% –Current smokers vs. other: 33% vs. 22% – 60 yr: 20% vs. 27% –EF 40%: 28% vs. 23% –Hypertension, yes vs. no: 23% vs. 24% –Diabetes, yes vs. no: 25% vs. 23% –Prior PTCA/CABG, yes vs. no: 22% vs. 25% p values for all subgroups were statistically significant Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

CARE - Observations Baseline LDL influence on Events*Baseline LDL influence on Events* –LDL % p < –LDL < 125 3%p = 0.85 –LDL > p = Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335: *Events included; fatal CHD, nonfatal MI, CABG or Angioplasty

CARE - Safety No difference in fatal and nonfatal primary cancers... exceptNo difference in fatal and nonfatal primary cancers... except Breast Cancer:Breast Cancer: –Placebo (n=1) –Pravastatin (n=12), p=0.002* Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335: Of the 12 breast cancer cases in the pravastatin group, all were nonfatal; 3 occurred in patients who had previously had breast cancer, 1 was ductal carcinoma in situ, and 1 occurred in a patient who took pravastatin for only six weeks.

Summary Cholesterol lowering with pravastatin in patients with MI and TC < 240 mg/dL Fatal CHD or nonfatal MI24% Fatal MI37% Nonfatal MI23% All MI, fatal or nonfatal25% Coronary artery bypass surgery26% Coronary angioplasty23% Stroke31% Reduced Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

Expected Number of Cardiovascular Events Preventable by Treating 1000 Patients with Pravastatin for Five Years Number of Events Number of Events Events Total Group Age > 60 Women Fatal CHD Nonfatal Ml CABG PTCA Strokes TIA Other Cardiovascular38577 All Cardiovascular Events Patients with 1 event pre vented Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9

Conclusion These results demonstrate that the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy extends to the majority of patients with coronary disease who have average cholesterol levelsThese results demonstrate that the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy extends to the majority of patients with coronary disease who have average cholesterol levels Sacks, F. et al, N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1001-9