Student Learning Objectives (SLO)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Professional Learning
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Assuring Quality of Education: Regulations for Education Programs
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND YOUR TEACHER EVALUATION NYSUT Education and Learning Trust NYSUT Field and Legal Services NYSUT Research and Educational.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Carl Bonuso Mr. Fred Cohen Dr. Valerie C. D’Aguanno Dr. Robert.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
New York State Common Core Social Studies Framework
Graduating Students College & Career Ready: What’s Next
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Madison Central 2013 – 2016 Strategic Plan
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Introduction to Pearson Forward
Hope-Hill ES.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Local Control Accountability Plan
Essential Learnings All students will be productive and responsible citizens in a competitive world.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Comprehensive Planning
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
North Country/ Mohawk Regional NTI
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Teacher SLTs
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Implementing Race to the Top
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Student learning objectives introduction
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Regional Curriculum Council January 25, 2012

Objectives for Today Review Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Prioritize district steps for moving forward with SLOs Answer questions that can be answered now Plan for “next steps”

Student Learning Objectives A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning for the year (or, semester, where applicable). It must be specific and measurable, based on available prior student learning data, and aligned to Common Core, State or national standards, as well as any other school and district priorities. Teachers’ scores are based upon the degree to which their goals were attained.

What Are Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)? This slide lays out New York’s own definition of a Student Learning Objective. Student learning is our priority: it is at the heart of our system. SLOs demand a new level of clarity about what the essential learning is for students. SLOs offer an opportunity to document the impact that all educators make on students. In order to document and focus teacher impact, SLOs must be specific and measureable. Setting goals for student learning emphasizes outcomes, rather than inputs. SLOs focus attention on data and outcomes. SLOs are long-term, measurable academic goals based on as much available prior student learning data as possible. They are aligned to standards (CCSS, State, or national) and district and school priorities. NYSED Webinar (12.20.11)

The Foundations for SLOs Most Important Learning Curriculum Maps Units Designed with Enduring Understandings Available Prior Student Learning Data Common Assessments by grade level/content area Baseline/Diagnostic Assessments Vertical communication Specific and Measureable Student achievement goals (NOT professional goals) SMART goal writing process Alignment Curriculum and Instructional Units based on standards (state, CCLS, national) District wide goals (CDEP, BOE goals, CEP) IES/E2CCB (12.20.11)

Alignment of our Priorities and Goals “Sound strategy starts with having the right goal.” ~ Michael Porter “Sound strategy starts with having the right goal.” ~ Michael Porter Read and highlight the words that stand out to you. Discuss as large group – working to ensure that we have a common definition of SLO

School Improvement District Improvement Plan Teacher Evaluation Teacher Growth Plans Initiative Teacher Induction Teacher Performance Standards School Improvement Plans Principal Evaluation Data Teams PLCs Assessments/Screenings Coaching & Mentoring In-services - PD Resource Allocation Adapted From: Marzano, R.J. (2010). Whitepaper: Creating an aligned system

Supporting Improvement Through Alignment and Coherence PLCs Principal Evaluation Teacher Supervision & Evaluation Teaching Standards Data Teams School Improvement Plans In-services - PD Coaching & Mentoring Teacher Growth Plans Resource Allocation Multi-Tier Support District Improvement Plan Initiatives Adapted From: Marzano, R.J. (2010). Whitepaper: Creating an aligned system

Evidence and Growth Across All Levels Outcomes for Students District All Schools School All Teachers Classroom All Students Evidence and Growth Across All Levels

Identifying Success District School Teachers In each column identify how each of these groups defines success for a given school, classroom or course for a given year. District School Teachers Are there particular areas of alignment that you see among the three? Are there particular areas of misalignment among the three? Are all of the definitions of success being advocated measurable? As tables, brainstorm the definition of success. (10 minutes) Debrief questions

“There is no power for change greater than a community discovering what it cares about.”   ~ Margaret Wheatley

SLOs Focus Attention on Essential Learning, Data, and Outcomes What is the aggregate of what my students will learn this year? September/October November/December January/February March/April May/June From NY DOE engageny.org Introduction to SLO Deck

SLOs Focus Attention on Essential Learning, Data, and Outcomes What is the aggregate of what our students will learn through their school career? Kindergarten Primary Grades Elementary Grades Middle School High School From NY DOE engageny.org Introduction to SLO Deck

Key Messages for SLOs Continued… Illustrative Alignment of Annual Goals: District, School, Teacher District Goal: by the end of 2014-2015 school year, increase the percentage of students who meet the Aspirational Performance Measures, which are indicators of College and Career Readiness, from 35% to 50%. Middle School Goal: by the end of 2012-13 school year, increase the percentage of students who score a proficient on end of course State assessments by at least 10%, as compared to 2011-12; increase those scoring advanced by at least 5%. Teacher Goal: by the end of 2012-13 school year, 85% of students will demonstrate growth on the Social Studies assessment compared to their prior grade performance. From NY DOE engageny.org Introduction to SLO Deck

5 District Decisions by 5/30/2012 Assess and identify priorities and academic needs. Identify who will have State-provided growth measures and who must have SLOs as “comparable growth measures.” Determine District rules for how specific SLOs will get set. Establish expectations for scoring SLOs and for determining teacher ratings for the growth component. Determine District-wide processes for setting, reviewing, and assessing SLOs in schools. 3/01 4/16 5/30 From NY DOE engageny.org Introduction to SLO Deck

Step 1: Determine District-wide Priorities and Academic Needs Assess and identify District-wide priorities and academic needs. Start with commitments and focus areas in District strategic plans. Decide how prescriptive the District will be and where decisions will be made by principals, or principals with teachers. From NY DOE engageny.org Introduction to SLO Deck

What Does the District Determine? This slide lays out the steps Districts need to take before schools and teachers can get started with SLOs. 1. Start with your overall district priorities and needs 2. Work through grades/subjects for your teachers and identify who must set SLOs and who will have SLOs 3. Determine how specific SLOS will get set. Specifically, what grades and subjects already have district-wide assessments that you will require be used with SLOs; are there areas where you plan to develop or acquire new assessments; what choices around assessments will you leave to schools? 4. Establish district expectations for scoring SLOs, and for determining teacher ratings for the growth component. 5. Finally, make district decisions about processes for developing, approving, and assessing SLOs. For instance, what timetable will you set for your goal setting/review cycle? How will you ensure consistency and rigor across classrooms (e.g., will the district approve all SLOs, or a sample?); what training and resources will you provide for principals and teachers (norming activities, inter-rater reliability, etc); what data systems can help support the SLO process, and how will you address assessment security? NYSED Webinar (12.20.11)

This slide makes the point about how many of our teachers will have Student Learning Objectives as their growth measures. Let’s start at the bottom of this bar chart which has been generated using SED class assignment data. Approximately 14% of our teachers are teaching in 4-8 ELA and Math. These teachers will receive growth/VA scores from the state. Moving up, you see that our data says that 21% of teachers are assigned as teachers of students in Special education, ESL, or bilingual: many are covered by state assessments in the 4-8 ELA/Math group so they will have state-provided growth/VA scores. If not, they will have SLOs. Continuing, we get to middle and high school ELA, math, science and social studies: our “core subject areas” in the Regulations. Here, dependent on funding, we have plans to add state assessments in: ELA 9-11 (2012-13) Science 6-8 Social Studies 6-8  These teachers will all have SLOs in 2012-13. For all of our other teachers (such as K-3, CTE, phys ed, arts, etc.), SLOs will be used to measure student learning for the State growth component of a teacher’s overall evaluation. NYSED Webinar (12.20.11)

Growth is State-provided SGP/VA Teachers by Grade and Subject: Growth is State-provided SGP/VA Growth is SLO K-2 Teachers Future Possibly 1 SLO for ELA (literacy and writing) 1 SLO for Math (unless teacher focuses on single subject area) 3 Teachers (must use State assessment as evidence) 4-8 Common Branch/ ELA/Math Teachers YES N/A 4-8 Science and Social Studies Subject Teachers Future Likely - 1 SLO for each subject/assessment – (SLOs must cover classes with largest numbers of students until a majority of students are covered) Grades 6-7 Science and 6-8 Social Studies must use a State-approved 3rd party assessment as evidence; Grade 4 and Grade 8 Science must use a State assessment as evidence. 4-8 Other Subject Teachers NO 9-12 Core Subjects, Regents Subjects and Regents Equivalents As available 1 SLO for each subject/assessment - (SLOs must cover classes with largest numbers of students until a majority of students are covered) - Core Subjects: High school ELA, Math, Science and Social Studies courses associated in 2010-11 with Regents or, in the future, with other State assessments must use a State assessment as evidence if one exists (or Regents equivalents). If not, SLO must use assessment from list of State-approved 3rd party assessments and Regents equivalents. 9-12 Other Subject Teachers 1 SLO for each subject/assessment - (SLOs must cover classes with largest numbers of students until a majority of students are covered Teachers with a Mix of Sections/Courses With/ Without State-Provided Growth Measures Yes if ≥50%of sections/students are covered by SGP/VA If <50% covered by SGP/VA, then SLOs will be used. - First, SLOs must use SGP/VA where available; then create SLOs for largest sections without SGP/VA until majority of students are covered.

Who needs SLOs?

School Wide, Group or Team Measures School-wide, group, or team measures are an option as a comparable growth measure SLO but they must be based on State assessments. Provides a means of providing measures of student learning for teachers who do not have a common, district-wide or State assessment that covers their content area.

This slide makes the point about how many of our teachers will have Student Learning Objectives as their growth measures. Let’s start at the bottom of this bar chart which has been generated using SED class assignment data. Approximately 14% of our teachers are teaching in 4-8 ELA and Math. These teachers will receive growth/VA scores from the state. Moving up, you see that our data says that 21% of teachers are assigned as teachers of students in Special education, ESL, or bilingual: many are covered by state assessments in the 4-8 ELA/Math group so they will have state-provided growth/VA scores. If not, they will have SLOs. Continuing, we get to middle and high school ELA, math, science and social studies: our “core subject areas” in the Regulations. Here, dependent on funding, we have plans to add state assessments in: ELA 9-11 (2012-13) Science 6-8 Social Studies 6-8  These teachers will all have SLOs in 2012-13. For all of our other teachers (such as K-3, CTE, phys ed, arts, etc.), SLOs will be used to measure student learning for the State growth component of a teacher’s overall evaluation. NYSED Webinar (12.20.11)

School Wide, Group or Team Measures SLO based on school-wide growth on the State ELA tests as a measure of student growth for all arts teachers within a district since growth in the various arts is difficult to measure and ELA skills could be enhanced by course work in the arts. In this case, all arts teachers in a school would earn the same score for the growth component of their evaluations.

School Wide, Group or Team Measures A district may decide to measure all elementary school push-in and pull-out teachers on school-wide growth on ELA and/or Math because the districts believes it will help promote collaboration, and it is difficult at this point to determine their individual contribution to specific students’ growth.

Questions Email questions and requests for information at anytime to: slohelp@mail.nysed.gov