HBr V(m+7) H+: Bandwidths https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PPT-200212ak.ppt https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-200212aka.xls
Old fit by Long which was not very good https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-200212aka.xls
I can not find this one Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw 6 7.80613 0.7 17.4721 0.764733 11.5016 4.12475 7.33774 0.555272 13.6021 1.30699 17.4213 0.793153 16.8335 0.695287 https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-200212aka.xls
Not convincing fit Reasonable fit
Is this fit based on the Full J´=6 peak’ Bad fit in this region GOOD overall visual fit
Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw 6 7.80613 0.7 17.4721 0.764733 11.5016 4.12475 7.33774 0.555272 13.6021 1.30699 17.4213 0.793153 16.8335 0.695287
This one looks the best to me Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw Bw 6 7.80613 0.7 17.4721 0.764733 11.5016 4.12475 7.33774 0.555272 13.6021 1.30699 17.4213 0.793153 16.8335 0.695287
Based on the above figures and fits I suggest we use BW(J´=6) = 11 +/- 3 J´ Use average value from all experiments 1 2 3 4 5 Not included 6 Value based on above, ca. 11 +/- 3 7 Average value for exp. Other than “old value from Long 8 9 All in all:
stdev J´ <BW> error 3.139257 0.635296 1 3.228763 0.547863 2 3.139257 0.635296 1 3.228763 0.547863 2 3.76391 0.193317 3 4.554887 0.45988 4 8.180523 0.707259 5 6 11 7 8.939383 0.483114 8 6.163523 0.357336 9 5.151303 0.339359 https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-200212aka.xls