Naval Air Station Jacksonville 6 Nov 2014 Fleet Energy Training Event 2014 Commander, Naval Air Force, Atlantic CAPT Chris Boyle, N40 LCDR Clint Hoskins, N43 Naval Air Station Jacksonville 6 Nov 2014

Agenda CVN Energy Conservation Aviation Fuel Usage Air ENCON Program Overview Beta Test Current Focus Your Role Questions

Aircraft Carrier Energy At sea, Aircraft Carriers are powered by an alternative energy source – Nuclear Inport, Aircraft Carriers use pier electrical service and shore steam to power shipboard equipment Photos changed

CVN 68 Class Energy Conservation Bulbous Bow installed on CVN 76 and follow-on ships BioFuel: 50 / 50 blend of JP-5 / BioFuel authorized for use in CVN Emergency Diesel Generators Simulators used to train Bridge and Propulsion Plant Watchstanders Environmental Protection and Energy Conservation ( EPEC ) Award added to Battle “E” score Question: What does last bullet mean? Answer: Slide 4 - the results are that from slides 5/6. The Automated metering infrastructure has yet to be fully functional for our piers. The data from slides 5 and 6 is from the actual ship's logs that we used to try and evaluate our consumption. BLUF - it will be used to compare against each other and see if ships can observe inport energy consumption and conserve when they can (A/C loads, lighting in unmanned spaces, etc). Slides 5/6 are representations of the actual inport energy consumption for TR and BUSH (logs). It shows us how ships use power both during a daily cycle and wrt getting underway and how that compares with the rest of the fleet.

Aircraft Carrier Inport Energy Profile Question: What does this tell us? Answer: See slide 4 notes

Aircraft Carrier Inport Energy Profile Question: What does this tell us? Answer: See slide 4 notes

CVN 78 Class Energy Conservation Catapult steam, service steam and steam turbine driven auxiliaries eliminated Electric water heaters installed Reduced maintenance load and reduced ships weight by eliminating a piping network that covered the entire ship High efficiency fluorescent T-8 lighting Produces more light than legacy T-12 with reduced energy consumption

SMALL INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE! Aviation Fuel Usage Navy fuel consumption by numbers The U.S. consumes 7.1 billion barrels of liquid fuel per year, ~25% of world demand, while the Federal Government accounts for about 2%. Naval Aviation accounts for about 12 million barrels annually. For every $1 rise in the price of petroleum, the Navy’s fuel bill increases by $31 million per year. SMALL INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE! Question: What do the 6% and 1% numbers accounting for. Answer: Navy Fuel Consumption (USN):   Maritime: 51% Aviation: 42% Shore: 6%*** Expeditionary: 1%*** Naval Fuel Consumption (USN + USMC): Aviation: 40% Maritime: 38% Expeditionary: 16% Shore: 6% Source: Naval Energy Strategic Roadmap (2010-10-07). The 'Navy' vs. 'Naval' distinction is important when discussing consumption drivers. I believe that the first brief of the morning had an updated breakdown of fuel consumption, but the numbers hadn't changed much. Total USG Liquid Fuel Use DoD Fuel Use US Navy Fuel Use by Function

Cost Per Hour ( CPH ) . . . for a typical Air Wing FA 45% FM 15% FF 39% FW <1% Contracts (FW) 100% fixed cost. Labor contracted to sustain aircraft. Cost is not recoverable and is lost in year of execution. For a typical air wing, 40% of the cost per hour comes from fuel. Reducing the amount of fuel consumed for T&R will directly drive down the CPH. Fuel (FF) 100% variable cost. Reduce flying, reduce cost. Consumables (FM) Items used to sustain or repair aircraft. Reduce flying, reduce most cost. Residual cost incurred as periodic maintenance is performed. Repairables/AVDLR (FA) Aircraft components that are repaired and returned to the supply system. Reduce flying, reduce costs. Residual cost incurred as periodic maintenance is performed. Average CPH

Leadership Guidance NAE Strategic Guidance, 2013-2014 called for a reduction in the Flying Hour Program cost per flight hour of 10%. The Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) had set forth aggressive energy goals to reduce the Department of the Navy’s (DON) overall consumption of energy and decrease reliance on petroleum. Leadership realized the importance of having resources available when needed and during the 2013-2014 NAE strategic guidance, they called for a reduction in the Flying Hour Program cost per flight hour of 10%. Culture needed to change and we needed to take a good hard look at how we were executing our flight hours.

Air ENCON Background Task Force Energy ( TFE ) established the Aviation Working Group (AWG ) to study and identify fuel-saving opportunities through the NAE AWG consisted of active-duty aviators, support personnel and civilian members of the NAVAIR team Studied existing fuel practices (commercial & military), evaluation of potential operations and interviews with current aviators AWG proposed the Aviation Energy Conservation ( Air ENCON ) program, modeled on Surface Warfare community’s Incentivized Energy Conservation ( i-ENCON ) program Defines roles / responsibilities, structure, metrics, awards and incentives, initial fuel-saving procedures to target, and implementation schedules In 2011, the Aviation Working Group (AWG) of Navy Task Force Energy (TFE) proposed the development of the Aviation Energy Conservation program, Air ENCON, similar to the surface community’s i-ENCON to study our current state and determine best practices for future operations where we could save money and resources.

Air ENCON Program Overview Objective Establish a Naval Aviation Enterprise-wide program that: Reduces reliance upon petroleum; Promotes a culture of energy awareness; Identifies and communicates best practices; Eliminates inefficient cultural paradigms; Rewards innovation and most efficient utilization of energy resources Without negatively impacting safety, mission or readiness Big picture, Naval Aviation needed come up with ways to reduce fuel consumption while maintaining T&R. The also needed a way to share those ideas throughout the fleet.

Air ENCON IPT Primary Stakeholders Task Force Energy presides over Navy energy programs and efforts Manages SECNAV Energy Awards Serve as co-IPT lead for Air ENCON CNAL representative and leadership facilitate Atlantic Fleet squadron Air ENCON activities CNAP and CNAL are the Integrated Planning Team leads for Air ENCON NAVAIR provides contract support along with concept technical evaluation and risk management Deloitte provides data analysis and reporting and assists with strategic communications and validation of ‘best practices’ All of these fee the Air ENCON program in an attempt to meet TFE goals Telecon bi-weekly with CNAP, CNAL, NAVAIR, OPNAV, Deloitte Serve as co-IPT lead for Air ENCON CNAP representative and leadership facilitate Pacific Fleet squadron Air ENCON activities Contract support Day-to-day program coordination Data analytical support Concept technical evaluation Risk management Data analysis and reporting Definition, validation, and articulation of best practices Develop strategic communications and training materials and assist driving culture change Risk planning Contractor Support

Beta Test Leadership Guidance Air ENCON Beta test launch 2013 In 2013, the Air ENCON program launched a beta test for 19 squadrons to begin real-time evaluations of fuel-savings practices. VADM Buss and RADM Branch distributed communications encouraging support for the beta test. In 2013, the Air ENCON program launched a beta test of 19 squadrons, including all TMS. The goal of the beta test was to validate 2 approved SOGs and provide an open forum to exchange ideas on energy savings.

Air ENCON Current Focus Data Analysis Standard Operating Guidance ( SOG ) Fleet Communications Beta Test CY13, Fleet Rollout 01 Apr 2014 - SOG (also known as “best practices”)

Air ENCON Current Focus - Data Analysis ACES: Summarizes all Budget Operating Report (BOR) data by squadron, providing executed flight hours and fuel consumed. FHP: Tracks allocated flight hours and R+ month in a Fleet Readiness Training Plan (FRTP) phase. Every quarter, the beta test squadrons were given a quarterly progress report utilizing data from ACES where we received the flight hours executed and fuel consumed and the Flying Hour Program which tracks allocated flight hours by R+ month Each progress report delineates whether the squadron is on a declining or improving trend based on their previous 36 months. They are also ranked against other TMS. CAVTS is a program that the IPT utilizes when analyzing potential Standard Operating Guidance to validate the cost benefits. CAVTS: A web-tool process used to identify future FHP cost drivers, track actual execution. Utilized for SOG development. More Information Will Be Provided in the Aviation Breakout Session

Air ENCON Current Focus - SOGs Two SOGs approved, Eight in Pipeline Fuel Truck and Hot Pit Refueling - APPROVED Short-Cycle Mission and Recovery Tanking (SMART) - APPROVED Optimum Climb Profile Continuous Descent Profile Optimum Thrust T/O (Land Based) Less-Than-All Engine Taxi (Land Based) Base-Wide Takeoff Time Allocation Configuration Optimization Minimize APU Use Maximum Range Profile Question: What are SOG’s and base-wide Takeoff Time Allocations? Answer: SOG (Standard Operating Guidance) Attached are a SOG example Base-Wide Takeoff Time Allocation would include: Less fuel burned turning on deck during periods of lower traffic density Less fuel burned airborne due to decreased competition for training areas Reduced delays upon RTB and post-landing activities such as brake and munitions checks Requires coordination with wing and base operations to allocate takeoff (and range) times by squadron More Information Will Be Provided in the Aviation Breakout Session

Air ENCON Current Focus - Approved SOGs Reduce Fuel Dump Short-Cycle Mission and Recovery Tanking ( SMART ) Estimated savings of 15,000 gallons of fuel per eight event fly day Increase Truck Refueling Replace “hot pit” refueling with “cold” truck refueling for fixed-wing aircraft NAS Oceana study estimated 245,000 gallons in savings per year on-base Question: “Estimated savings of 15,000 gallons of fuel per eight event fly day” – YGTBSM Answer: This was based on actual CVW-7 deployment data...   "In a previous demonstration over 112 OEF fly days, CVW-7 observed savings of 1.68 million gallons of fuel (15,000 gallons/day) and 1,120 flight hours (10 hours/day). This translates into $2.35 million at $1.40/gallon for OEF and $6.45 million at the current JP-5 price of $3.84. The projected potential savings for Navy-wide implementation of SMART is approximately 10.5 million gallons of fuel and $40.3 million dollars annually, based on the current JP-5 price of $3.84 per gallon." The attached brief from CDR Orchard-Hays provides a generic history of SMART evolution via CVW-5 (2008), CVW-7 (2009/10), and CVW-3 (2010). You will note that the quoted fuel savings fall within the analytical range of the charts provided yesterday ("Total Fuel Burn: Variation 2 vs. Variation 4" Pg. 50 --> 0 to 26,470 gallons per fly day). This suggests that 15,000 gallons / day is a reasonable estimate of typical results rather than an extreme 'upper bound.‘ Question: What other issues (truck drivers training, trucks, support pers) are being address/considered? Answer: The attached “Naval Air Station Oceana Fuel Truck and Hot Pit Refueling Concept Validation Report” by Booz Allen Hamilton has made all of those considerations. More Information Will Be Provided in the Aviation Breakout Session 19

Air ENCON Current Focus - Fleet Communications Website http://airencon.dodlive.mil N40 SharePoint Site https://cpf.portal.navy.mil/sites/cnap/N40/encon/default.aspx CAC Enabled Quarterly Beta Squadron Reports There are several avenues the fleet can utilize to learn about best practices and share ideas for ways to save fuel. The Air ENCON website, the N40 Sharepoint site (CAC enabled) and the quarterly beta squadron reports. More Information Will Be Provided in the Aviation Breakout Session

Your Role Keep an open mind and consider how to achieve SECNAV objectives: Stay engaged Provide feedback on the Air ENCON program Provide innovative suggestions for future energy conservation efforts Implement new energy conservation practices Question: Who is the audience? Answer: All CNAL aviation commands.

Questions?