BAAQMD Rulemaking Greg Nudd Acting Rules and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOODS MOVEMENT & Air Quality Considerations Presented by Larry Greene, Executive Director Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD)
Advertisements

Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SENATE BILL X1 28 & UPDATE OF POWER PLANT SITING GUIDANCE Workgroup Meeting August 3, 2001 California Environmental Protection Agency.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD DIESEL EMISSIONS STANDARDS AL UPTON BUTTE COUNTY FLEET MANAGER  Four separate rules apply to Public Agencies  On-Road.
Bay Area Emission Reduction Strategies June 4, 2008 Jean Roggenkamp Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District Climate Protection Program NACAA, Indianapolis, Indiana June 12-13, 2007 Wayne Kino Air Quality Program Manager.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
SCAQMD Air Quality Permitting for Emerging Technologies Jay Chen, P.E. South Coast Air Quality Management District November 4, 2009 Southern California.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group April 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Emissions Solutions Al Gray Technical Communicator Cashman Equipment.
CAPCOA Jack Broadbent. Who We Are  35 Air Districts  Representing nearly 2,000 Air Quality professionals  Governing Board made of 14 APCOs  Coordinates.
Board Meeting June 27, 2013 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Update on Recommendations to the California Public Utilities.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
PM2.5 Working Group Meeting #2 South Coast Air Quality Management District July 11, 2006.
Public Workshop Proposed RACT/BARCT Determination for Stationary Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines August 29, 2000 California Environmental Protection.
1 ITSA Meeting April 2, 2004 San Diego Thermal Spraying in California.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Final Regulation Order for Truck and Bus Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board November 20, 2014.
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
Overview of the AB2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Proposed Amendments to Fuel Test Methods Monitoring and Laboratory Division January 25, 2013.
CALIFORNIA WATER ISSUES Survey of Wine Institute Advocacy Efforts Wine Institute Board of Directors Meeting – March 8, 2016 Tim Schmelzer, Director of.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to the AB 2588 Guidelines Regulation July 27, 2006 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,
MJAC Founded 1928 December 2016
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Compliance and Enforcement Presentation to Industrial Association of Contra Costa County February 22, 2017 Paul Grazzini, Air Quality Specialist Bay.
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Flexible Air Permitting
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Quarterly Meeting November 30, 2016
Clean Air Act Glossary.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
BACWA Air Issues & Regulations ● Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Annual Tribal and EPA Conference October 31, 2018
CEQA Guidelines & Thresholds Update
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
SIA in US Legislative Update Shanghai, China
AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Presentation transcript:

BAAQMD Rulemaking 2017-2019 Greg Nudd Acting Rules and Strategic Policy Officer September 21, 2017 1 1

Overview Upcoming Rules on Criteria Pollutants Air Toxics Reductions at Existing Sources (Rule 11-18) Climate Rules (Methane) Impact of Assembly Bill 617 2 2

Reg 6 Rules: Coarse Particulate Matter Criteria Pollutants Reg 6 Rules: Coarse Particulate Matter Rule 6-1 is currently a Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) rule Tighten general particulate matter emissions limits Specify test methods for determining compliance Require periodic compliance testing New Regulation 6, Rule 6: Prohibition of Trackout No “significant” visible roadway material on adjacent paved roadway Cleanup required at end of work day New Regulation 6, Rule 8: Bulk Material Handling No “significant” visible dust No visible dust beyond the property line Clean up spills 3 3

Refinery Fuel Gas Sulfur Limits Criteria Pollutants Refinery Fuel Gas Sulfur Limits Regulation 9, Rule 1, Sulfur Dioxide Limit total sulfur in refinery fuel gas to reduce SO2 emissions from RFG combustion Sets a limit on the total sulfur content of RFG of 100 ppm (90-day average basis) Requires monitoring and sampling of RFG for total sulfur Expected to reduce SO2 emissions by ~250 tpy 4 4

Rule 9-9: Gas-Fired Turbines Criteria Pollutants Rule 9-9: Gas-Fired Turbines Lower NOx limits on small (50 to 100 MMBtu/hr) and medium-sized (100 to 500 MMBtu/hr) turbines Small turbines expected to comply by installing combustion-based controls (e.g., steam injection or Dry Low NOx) Medium-sized turbines expected to comply by installing or modifying SCR systems 5 5

Regulation 1, Regulation 8, Manual of Procedures – Criteria Pollutants Regulation 1, Regulation 8, Manual of Procedures – Update and Cleanup Consolidate definitions of VOC in various Reg 8 Rules into one definition and place in Reg 1 Amend provisions in certain Reg 8 Rules that require updating and/or clarification Amend the MOP to support Reg 1/Reg 8 project and to update/clarify certain volumes     6 6

Capping Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Bay Area risk levels decline since 1990 1990 2001 2014 7 7

Capping Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Rule 11-18 Reduces Risks from TACs to the lowest achievable levels Particularly benefits CARE areas Incorporates latest health risk methodologies Promotes continuous improvement Ensures public transparency Provides greater flexibility 8 8

Capping Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Rule 11-18: Risk Action Thresholds A. Benefit of Setting the Risk Action Level at 10 per Million An Air District staff review of the toxic emissions from the potentially affected facilities indicates that these risk levels range from approximately 56/M to 10/M at the maximally exposed individual (MEI). Approximately 450 facilities would be required to reduce their risk impacted under the proposed rule. B. Ten per Million v. 25 per Million – What’s the Difference? 10/M is achievable and has been and continues to be demonstrated in practice in at least ten air pollution control districts, including Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control Districts. Air District staff estimated that numbers of residents that would be included under each risk action level scenario and determined that the 10/M action level would serve to reduce risk to about 10 to 15 times as many people as the 25/M action level. 9 9

Capping Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Air District staff will conduct health risk assessments Facilities above Risk Action Levels must: Develop a risk reduction plan for Air District approval Plan must get down below 2020 Risk Action Levels (10/million) Execute plan according to plan schedule Risk reduction measures include: Installation of Best Available Retrofit Control Technologies for Toxics (TBARCT) Modification of operating hours and activity levels Modification of emissions point characteristics 10 10

Capping Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Proposed Rule 11-18 Publish Final Hearing Package (September 2017) Proposed Rule Staff Report Socioeconomic Analysis Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (CEQA) TBARCT Workbook Public Comments Due: October 16th Board Hearing for Adoption (November 15, 2017) Implementation Phase 1: Facilities with PS > 250 (including multiple-source facilities) 2017-2018 Phase 2: PS >10 including MSF Phase 3: Stationary Diesel Engines: 2021-2027 Phase 4: Retail Gasoline Stations: 2023-2028 11 11

Prohibit Significant Methane Leaks Climate Rules Prohibit Significant Methane Leaks Establish a general/catch-all methane emissions limit (Draft Rule 13-2) applicable to all sources Considering a methane emissions limit of 10,000 ppm and 10 lbs/hr. If a source can demonstrate a methane leak is  less than 10 lbs/hr, no need to repair. If a repair is required, methane leak must be repaired and demonstrated to be less than 500 ppm Rule will likely include a delay-of-repair provisions 12 12

Climate Rules Oil and Gas Rule Air District Rule 8-37 limits organic compounds from natural gas and crude oil facilities but exempts methane ARB’s Oil & Gas Rule (adopted in Mar 2017) Covers < 25% of Bay Area GHG emissions due to exemptions Allows air districts to implement firmer requirements How will it work? Consider a lower leak threshold to achieve cost-effective methane and VOC emissions reductions and protect public health Remove methane exemption from rule 13 13

Climate Rules Composting Registration for organic waste processing to better track material and characterize emissions Best Management Practices (BMPs) Storage Pile size and time limits at Transfer Stations and Chip and Grind facilities Additional BMPs for Composting Facilities required subject to low- throughput or other exemption limits (community, park, on-site agricultural) Control equipment for larger facilities Biofilters Alternative control methods 14 14

AB 617 Components Require additional air monitoring in impacted communities Develop methods to reduce air pollution in impacted communities Develop clearinghouse for Best Available Retrofit Control Technology; air districts adopt additional BARCT rules Require uniform reporting of emissions inventories Increase allowable fines ($5,000 per day) Slide 15 15

Air Monitoring in Impacted Communities AB 617 Requirement – State/air districts to enhance air monitoring in impacted communities. Air District efforts already under way Identifying additional air monitoring locations in refinery communities. Assembling available data to help identify additional locations for potential monitoring (health outcomes, modeling, short term studies, etc.). Working with equipment manufacturers, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), South Coast AQMD, universities and other groups to identify cutting edge equipment. Slide 16 16

Emission Reduction Plans AB 617 Requirement – Identify areas impacted by criteria pollutants and Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) and develop Emission Reduction Plans to reduce those impacts. Air District efforts already under way Continued reduction of criteria pollutants Regulation 11, Rule 18 will require existing stationary sources to reduce risk from TACs to the lowest levels in the State Already adopted Regulation 2, Rule 5 to reduce TACs from new sources. CARE Program/Community Risk Reduction plans Planning Healthy Places Guidebook Slide 17 17

BARCT Requirements Air District efforts already under way AB 617 Requirement – State to develop a clearinghouse to define BARCT for stationary sources. Air districts to enact additional BARCT rules. Air District efforts already under way The 2017 Clean Air Plan evaluated all rules to determine which needed to be updated. Staff currently reviewing and prioritizing rules to ensure that this requirement is met. Slide 18 18

Emissions Inventory Reporting AB 617 Requirement – State to develop uniform emissions inventory reporting requirements for criteria pollutants and TACs and require sources to submit this information to the State. Air District efforts already under way Regulation 12, Rule 15 requires the use of uniform reporting of emissions inventories based on guidance produced and updated to incorporate the latest emissions information available. Regulation 11, Rule 18 will result in accurate, uniform emissions inventory for TACs to ensure health risk to the lowest levels achievable. Slide 19 19

Working with Partners and Timelines in AB 617 Conference calls every week with CARB and South Coast AQMD to discuss issues and develop plans forward. Working with other agencies, NGOs, universities and communities to hear ideas and receive feedback. Timelines for implementation are extremely aggressive and will require a refocus of Air District resources Air monitoring – deploy first stages by July 1, 2019 (Additions possible by Jan. 1, 2020 and annually thereafter). Emission Reduction Plans - Once an area is identified as being impacted, a reduction plan must be in place within one year BARCT Rules – Adoption of rules by Jan. 1, 2019 and implemented by Dec. 31, 2023 Slide 20 20

Questions? 21 21