Trip Generation and Mode Choice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

DEVELOPMENT OF MODE CHOICE MODEL FOR WORK TRIPS IN GAZA CITY State of Palestine Ministry of Transport Sadi I. S. AL-Raee EuroMed Regional Transport Project:
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Traffic Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
1 Transportation Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequence Meeghat Habibian Modeling approach.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Module 6: Continuous Probability Distributions
Modal Split Analysis.
Final Exam Tuesday, December 9 2:30 – 4:20 pm 121 Raitt Hall Open book
QUALITATIVE AND LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Queuing CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Mode Choice Survey Results. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Which variables do you think matter? What is your age? How far from campus do you live?
Signalized Intersections
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
MODELS OF QUALITATIVE CHOICE by Bambang Juanda.  Models in which the dependent variable involves two ore more qualitative choices.  Valuable for the.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Review- Observation-Inference-Prediction Carefully look at each image/graph and for each image/graph come up with – o 1 Observation o 1 Inference o 1 Prediction.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Estimating the Benefits of Bicycle Facilities Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Approaches Kevin J. Krizek Assistant Professor Director, Active.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Improving the Residential Location Model for the New York Metropolitan Region Haiyun Lin City College of New York Project Advisors: Prof. Cynthia Chen,
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin Probability Distributions Chapter 6.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MAJOR IN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JOHN IVAN P. GUEVARRA.
Elementary Statistics:
Unit 1 Exploring Data: Distributions
Statistical Significance
Probability Distributions
Car, walk or public transport?
What Is Statistics? Chapter 1.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
A New Approach to Measure Preferences of Users in Built Environments: Integrating Cognitive Mapping and Utility Models Benedict Dellaert Erasmus University.
Survey of Potential Overnight Service Passengers
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics Belgrade November, 2017
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
In-Class Exercise: The Poisson Distribution
Walking to transit (and potential of walking)
Maximum Likelihood Find the parameters of a model that best fit the data… Forms the foundation of Bayesian inference Slide 1.
Mode Choice Survey Results
Improved treatment of special attractors
Tabulations and Statistics
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
Transportation Demand Analysis
Honors Statistics Chapter 2
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
School of Civil Engineering
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
BUS 173: Applied Statistics
Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems
Who is your Target Market?
Probability Distributions
Maximum Likelihood We have studied the OLS estimator. It only applies under certain assumptions In particular,  ~ N(0, 2 ) But what if the sampling distribution.
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Presentation transcript:

Trip Generation and Mode Choice Saigon CEE 320 Anne Goodchild

Outline Trip Generation Mode Choice Survey

Trip Generation Purpose Approach Predict how many trips will be made Predict exactly when a trip will be made Approach Aggregate decision-making units Categorized trip types Aggregate trip times (e.g., AM, PM, rush hour) Generate Model

Motivations for Making Trips Lifestyle Residential choice Work choice Recreational choice Kids, marriage Money Life stage Technology

Reporting of Trips - Issues Under-reporting trivial trips Trip chaining Other reasons (passenger in a car for example)

Trip Generation Models Linear (simple) Poisson (a bit better) Poisson gives the average number of daily trips but can also calculate the probability of making X number of trips in a day.

Poisson Distribution Count distribution Uses discrete values Different than a continuous distribution P(n) = probability of exactly n trips being generated over time t n number of trips generated over time t λ average number of trips over time, t t duration of time over which trips are counted (1 day is typical)

Poisson Ideas Probability of exactly 4 trips being generated P(n=4) Probability of less than 4 trips generated P(n<4) = P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3) Probability of 4 or more trips generated P(n≥4) = 1 – P(n<4) = 1 – (P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3)) Amount of time between successive trips

Poisson Distribution Example Trip generation from my house is assumed Poisson distributed with an average trip generation per day of 2.8 trips. What is the probability of the following: Exactly 2 trips in a day? Less than 2 trips in a day? More than 2 trips in a day?

Example Calculations Exactly 2: Less than 2: More than 2: Less than 2 P(0) = e-(2.8)(1) = 0.0608 P(1) = 0.1703 P(0) + P(1) = 0.0608 + 0.1703 = 0.2311 More than 2 P(n>2) = 1 – (0.2311 + 0.2384) = 0.5305 More than 2:

Example Graph

Example Graph

Example: Time Between Trips

Example Recreational or pleasure trips measured by λi (Poisson model):

ln(λ) = 0.49

Example Probability of exactly “n” trips using the Poisson model: Cumulative probability Probability of one trip or less: P(0) + P(1) = 0.52 Probability of at least two trips: 1 – (P(0) + P(1)) = 0.48 Confidence level We are 52% confident that no more than one recreational or pleasure trip will be made by the average individual in a day

Mode Choice Purpose Approach Predict the mode of travel for each trip Categorized modes (SOV, HOV, bus, bike, etc.) Generate Model

Dilemma Qualitative Dependent Variable Explanatory Variables

Dilemma = observation Walk to School (yes/no variable) 1 1 = no, 0 = yes 10 Home to School Distance (miles)

A Mode Choice Model Logit Model Final form Specifiable part Unspecifiable part Betas are estimated using maximum likelihood s = all available alternatives m = alternative being considered n = traveler characteristic k = traveler

Discrete Choice Example Regarding the TV sitcom Gilligan’s Island, whom do you prefer?

Ginger Model UGinger = 0.0699728 – 0.82331(carg) + 0.90671(mang) + 0.64341(pierceg) – 1.08095(genxg) carg = Number of working vehicles in household mang Male indicator (1 if male, 0 if female) pierceg Pierce Brosnan indicator for question #11 (1 if Brosnan chosen, 0 if not) genxg generation X indicator (1 if respondent is part of generation X, 0 if not)

Mary Anne Model UMary Anne = 1.83275 – 0.11039(privatem) – 0.0483453(agem) – 0.85400(sinm) – 0.16781(housem) + 0.67812(seanm) + 0.64508(collegem) – 0.71374(llm) + 0.65457(boomm) privatem = number of years spent in a private school (K – 12) agem age in years sinm single marital status indicator (1 if single, 0 if not) housem number of people in household seanm Sean Connery indicator for question #11 (1 if Connery chosen, 0 if not) collegem college education indicator (1 if college degree, 0 if not) llm long & luxurious hair indicator for question #7 (1 if long, 0 if not) boomm baby boom indicator (1 if respondent is a baby boomer, 0 if not)

No Preference Model Uno preference = – 9.02430x10-6(incn) – 0.53362(gunsn) + 1.13655(nojames) + 0.66619(cafn) + 0.96145(ohairn) incn = household income gunsn gun ownership indicator (1 if any guns owned, 0 if no guns owned) nojames No preference indicator for question #11 (1 if no preference, 0 if preference for a particular Bond) cafn Caffeinated drink indicator for question #5 (1 if tea/coffee/soft drink, 0 if any other) ohairn Other hair style indicator for question #7 (1 if other style indicated, 0 if any style indicated)

Results Average probabilities of selection for each choice are shown in yellow. These average percentages were converted to a hypothetical number of respondents out of a total of 207.

My Results Uginger = – 1.1075 Umary anne – 0.2636 Uno preference – 0.3265

Primary References Mannering, F.L.; Kilareski, W.P. and Washburn, S.S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition. Chapter 8 Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual 2000. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.