Extent of Condition Joe Pardue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of River Protection 2013 Hanford ORP Site Status Report
Advertisements

B E S T B E S T B E S T.
8D Corrective Action. 2 8D Problem Solving & Corrective Action: Initiate 8D Corrective Action D1 - Create Problem Solving Team D2 - Define the Problem.
Improving recognition of and response tochild vulnerability – the development ofthe Greater Shepparton Vulnerability Guide Improving recognition of and.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
Environmental Management Systems Refresher
Office of River Protection 2014 Hanford ORP Site Status Report Glen Clark, WRPS 2014 ASP Workshop September, 2014 Albuquerque, NM Glen Clark, WRPS.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
Quality Representative Training Version
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Consolidated Audit Program (DOECAP) U.S. Department of Energy’s Consolidated Audit Program (DOECAP) Dr. Todd L. Hardt DOECAP.
Fundamentals of ISO.
1 Accreditation and Certification: Definition  Certification: Procedures by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service.
Worker Focused Safety Program Violence in the Workplace Worker Training Module 5.
Unit 14: Developing a Corrective Action Program Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  The purpose of a CAP  How a CAP benefits and supports.
Joe Pardue Operations Team Lead and Laboratory Lead DOECAP Operations Team Pro2Serve 1.
Office of River Protection 2015 Hanford ORP Site Status Report
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Joe Pardue Operations Team Lead and Laboratory Lead DOECAP Operations Team 1.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TOOL
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Leveraging the Management Review Process of ISO and OHSAS for Facility-level and Institutional-level.
TTMA Workshop September 30 th What Is HACCP? H - Hazard A - Analysis C - Critical C - Control P - Point HACCP is a food safety management system.
Software Quality Assurance SOFTWARE DEFECT. Defect Repair Defect Repair is a process of repairing the defective part or replacing it, as needed. For example,
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
National Center for Coastal Ocean Science Environmental Management System Implementation August 2005.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
DOECAP Laboratories Phased Audits U.S. Department of Defense 2016 Environmental Monitoring and Data Quality Workshop St. Louis, Missouri April 12-14, 2016.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
George E. Detsis Manager, Analytical Services Program United States Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Sustainability.
Electric System Financial Results Financial Planning Budget and Rates Building Community Reliability Standard Advisory Service NERC Onsite Visit, Feb 2013.
Table 1. The Five Medical Laboratory Case Studies Jan Martin et al. Transnational Evaluation of a New Continuing Professional Development Activity for.
Auditor-in-Training Guidance for the Trainer and the AIT ASP 2009 Workshop September 14-17, 2009 Susan L. Aderholdt.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Data Collection and Evaluation Module – Revised July, 2010.

Self-Identified Checklists and Phased Audit Training
People and Culture Office Safety, Health and Wellbeing
Writing Findings, Observations, and the Executive Summary
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category
DOECAP Laboratories Phased Audits U. S
U.S. Department of Energy Consolidated Audit Program
DOECAP Pilot Audit – Phase I The Saga of a Thorough, but Inefficient Audit September 2016.
kenya laboratory networking updates 27th June 2017
Joe Pardue Operations Team Lead and Laboratory Lead Pro2Serve
Self-Identified Checklists and Phased Audit Training
Fundamentals of ISO.
Quality Healthcare for Everyone
U.S. Department of Energy 2016 ASP Workshop
How To Be An Effective Auditor
QSM 5.1, QSAS 3.1, Errata Document Rev. 2
Director, Quality and Accreditation
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
Transition ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015
Auditor Feedback Results
People and Culture Office Safety, Health and Wellbeing
How To Be An Effective Auditor
DOE ASP 2016 Workshop 19-23Sep16.
Tools and Techniques for Quality
Path Forward for FY 2017 Laboratory Audits
Safety Self-Inspections
Performance Management Training
ET-CAC Report Kevin ALDER Agenda item 6-3 (1)
Section 6 – Rational Equations
Corrective Action Response Guidelines For TCEQ Accredited Laboratories
MODULE 7 Definitions Module 7 page 1.
Presentation transcript:

Extent of Condition Joe Pardue Operations Team Lead and Laboratory Lead DOECAP Operations Team ASP Workshop 2016 September 21, 2016

Extent of Condition The presence of similar condition across the organization. Mark Paradies, TapRooT, Changing the Way the World Solves Problems. Extent of conditions evaluations are usually conducted after the root cause has been established to determine if additional actions are required to address the risk of additional failures or non-conformances

Root Cause and Corrective Action DOECAP audited facilities are required to develop root causes for all findings that are issued The root cause is to determine the causal factors that resulted in a non-compliant or unacceptable issue Laboratories are also requested to evaluate extent of condition determinations to determine if the same non-compliant or unacceptable issue occurred in other areas of the facility

FY15 – Organic Finding on Balance Calibration Checks M2-150625-A: The laboratory does not use standard check weights that bracket the expected mass range for balance calibration checks. (Priority II) (QSM, Version 5.0, Module 2, Section 5.5.13.1, Table; TNI EL-V1M2-2009, Section 5.5.13.1b; Procedure XXXXXX, Revision 6.5, Section 11.2.1; Procedure XXXX, Revision 5.4, Section 20.3.1)

FY-16 Inorganic Finding on Balance Calibration Checks M3-16XXXX-B: The laboratory does not use standard check weights that bracket the expected mass range for balance calibration checks. (Priority II) (QSM, Version 5.0, Module 2, Section 5.5.13.1, Table; TNI EL-V1M2-2009, Section 5.5.13.1b; Procedure XXXXX, Revision 6.6, Section 11.2.1.1)

Extent of Condition The two findings were issued on consecutive years and were issue for the same failure The causal analysis and corrective action were focused on the area of the laboratory related to the finding and did not address all areas of the laboratory As a result, a second finding issued dealing with the same issue, resulting in the development of a corrective action

Extent of Condition The examples that have been presented are very straight forward The audited facilities area strongly encouraged to evaluate the causal analysis and the planned corrective for extent of conditions The DOECAP review of planned corrective actions should consider extent of conditions