Belgrade 13-14 December 2013 www.easpd.eu With support from the European Union Progress Programme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short overview of the SCORE project
Advertisements

Why does ERA Need to Flourish
THE PROJECT LIFECYCLE National Contact Point
Bernard Casier Member Quality Audit Cell The Flemish Quality Audit System Brussels, 26 th June 2012.
BORN BY COMBINATION. BORN BY COMBINATION. Key resources and tools for setting up local public goods in mountain areas of Emilia Romagna Antonella Bonaduce,
Innovative use of ICT in schools in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Portugal and the United Kingdom Ulf Fredriksson Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning,
Best practice for ensuring quality in international statistics - The Principal Global Indicators - Werner Bier, Per Nymand-Andersen European Central Bank.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
A strategy for a Secure Information Society –
WP7 Internal Evaluation & Quality Assurance Green Employability Project StudioCentroVeneto - Toni Brunello and Paolo Zaramella Vienna, 10th January 2012.
Mirjam Woutersen, Nancy van San and Henri Ponds
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA – State of Play ERA Monitoring and ERA progress report Fabienne Gautier Dublin, 14th June 2013.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
The EU framework for integration of third-country nationals: a focus on the role of cities and on funding opportunities Martin Schieffer, Immigration and.
Implications for the Regions EU-Regional Policy 1 Governance White Paper Introduction Adoption of White Paper on European Governance, July 25, 2001 Aim:
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
1 The role of macro- regional strategies after 2013 The Commissions view (or rather the view of one official) David Sweet, DG Regional Policy, European.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The urban dimension : State of play and perspectives Władysław Piskorz DIRECTORATE-GENERAL.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
RegGov: Regional Governance of Sustainable Integrated Development of Deprived Urban Areas Improving the impact of territorial co-operation on local policies.
URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
| | Learning from EuroHealthNets Health Inequalities Projects.
The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
0 - 0.
1 NECOBELAC Project WORK PACKAGE 3 Cross-national advocacy infrastructure.
My Rights – My Voice Training by Persons with Disabilities to Staff on UNCRPD (10/ /2014) Communication Plan & Dissemination Strategy Kick off meeting.
Erasmus+ Erasmus+: Sport Yves Le LostecqueDG Education and Culture Head of the Sport UnitEuropean Commission.
Governance Framework for Integrated Service Delivery Improving Government Service Delivery through Single-Window Service Initiatives Sponsored by the PSSDC.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry # European Standardisation: Proposal for a Regulation Presentation to IMCO – 5 October 2011 European Commission.
Importance of community-based services for persons with disabilities: Availability and quality International frame June 2012,Belgrade Dr.Vasilka.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
EuropeAid Co-operation Office Institutional Capacity Development Operations for the ACP Countries Unit AIDCO C4 Centralised Operations for the ACP Countries.
Structural Development and Quality Assurance of Higher Education
European Commission Research 1 The 6th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Richard ESCRITT Director Co-ordination of Community.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Manchester Children and Young People’s CYP IAPT Learning Collaborative
L EDA K OURSOUMBA C OMMISSIONER FOR C HILDREN ’ S R IGHTS (C YPRUS ) ENOC C HAIR E LECT European Network of Ombudspersons for Children (ENOC) 1.
Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union 24 February 2013 Joël Schuyer.
The role of ACER In the Regional Initiatives Steve Gordon Head Of the Gas Department North West Regional Initiatives 2011.
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
Table of contents 1 Manual of Operational Procedures (MOP) 2
The role of networks in the process of immigrant integration NIKOS STATHOPOULOS, NIKOS STATHOPOULOS, DIRECTOR, G&D SOCIAL LAB LTD Integration programs.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
NORMAPME ISO User Guide for European SMEs The essence of.
European vision for development and work of the national network Belgrade, 15 June 2012 Luk Zelderloo This event is sponsored by the PROGRESS Partnership.
QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN VET LUGANO MEETING
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
European Framework: Milestones in formal and social recognition of non- formal and informal learning in youth work Hans-Joachim Schild, European Commission,
European Network on Quality Assurance in VET Barbara Kelly Chairperson May 2006.
Thessaloniki, Outline I.Introduction II.Why a roadmap? III.What do we want authorities to do? IV.What can EASPD do? V.What can.
Belgrade, 24 April 2015 Sabrina Ferraina Senior Policy Officer
Quality of Service… beyond costs… towards investment Luk Zelderloo, Secretary General EASPD.
1 EPR Public Affairs 2010 Helsinki, 16 June 2010.
RELATION BETWEEN PEACE PROMOTION AND EDUCATION SECTOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE PROMOTION ACTION IPPA Rasa Useliene.
European Commission Environmental cooperation in the Mediterranean June 2009.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
1 Networking and Stakeholder Cooperation Answers on a (not yet) asked question! December 2006, Skopje Luk Zelderloo.
1 Validation: The Dutch Experience Conference “Adapting to Changes in Society” Tallinn, 27 May 2014 Drs. Amnon Owed Policy advisor Ministry of Education,
The industrial relations in the Commerce sector EU Social dialogue: education, training and skill needs Ilaria Savoini Riga, 9 May 2012.
Excellence in Teaching in Higher Education: The students’ perspective” Karina Ufert European Students’ Union, Chairperson Meeting of Directors General.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
How to improve the availability and quality of community-based services? Zagreb,23 November 2010 Dr.Vasilka Dimoska Specialist in social medicine and health.
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Antonio Cammarota DG EMPL/B3 Health and Safety
European experiences in transition from institutional to community-based settings Sabrina Ferraina, Policy Manager (EASPD)
Presentation transcript:

Belgrade December With support from the European Union Progress Programme.

1. Key dimensions of Networking 2. Stakeholder cooperation: a strategic choice 2

1.1 Conceptual dimension -Values and Principles 1.2 Structural dimension -Formal agreements & transparent structure 1.3 Operational dimension -Tangible outcomes and results 1.4 The way forward 3 1. Key Dimensions of Networking

Dos & Donts Being absent Making differences explicit Hop Skip Jump: exploring, elaborating, concluding United in Diversity Adopting the culture Conceptual dimension

Dos & Donts Being there Securing consensus Keeping rhythm and direction Need is the mother of invention Starting separately… Structural dimension

Dos & Donts Mandate! Words motivate, examples activate Recognising and ignoring territories Following the procedure Operational dimension

Indirect steering and influencing Flexibility Celebrating success Building identity Networking = the art of managing the paradox Losing time = winning time Lots of efforts = few results The more formal … the more dependent on individuals The way forward

2. Stakeholder cooperation: a strategic choice We live and work in a complex society: Different actors Different interests Different parties Different opinions Effective and successful implementation of policies is needed win-win situation 8

2.1 Stakeholders concept 9 A stakeholder approach is about creating tools and instruments to organise the communication between all parties involved

2.2 Actions when developing a stakeholder approach 1. Identify all stakeholders: who are the persons / bodies / authorities / networks / services / structures involved? Example related to the disability sector: people in need, service users staff authorities at all levels researchers service providers community, local actors (church, sports club, neighbourhood) parents, family members 10

2.2 Actions when developing a stakeholder approach 2. Identify different roles and responsibilities during the different phases of policy development: Advocacy Service provision Research General interest … 11

2.2 Actions when developing a stakeholder approach 3. Stakeholder roles & responsibilities during # phases 12

2.2 Actions when developing a stakeholder approach 4. Stakeholder management: bring into balance the different perspectives of the different stakeholders Map the expectations of the various stakeholders (aims & objectives) Select a dialogue technique (letters, telephone contact, hearing, structural contact, …) Organise feedback: do people agree with what you identified as needs and the dialogue method? Implementation of outcomes (of the dialogue and feedback); Weight of the input, value of the opinion / advice / decision / co- decision of a stakeholder Develop indicators to measure in what way the outcomes were implemented 13

2.3 Instruments for stakeholder cooperation 1.Sectoral agreements 2.Service level agreements (SLA) 3.Contracts and protocols 4.Integration in Quality Assurance Systems (QAS) 5.Integration in governance approach 14

CONCLUSION: Good governance = Internal and external challenges 15

Thank You