The Strong RF Focusing:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
SPEAR3 short pulse development J. Safranek for the SSRL accelerator physics group* Outline: Timing mode fill patterns Short bunches –Low alpha Bunch length.
Bunch length modulation in storage rings C. Biscari LNF – INFN - Frascati Workshop on “Frontiers of short bunches in storage rings” – Frascati – 7-8 Nov.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Physics Design on Injector I
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Some Issues on Beam-Beam Interaction & DA at CEPC
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP A. Gallo, with P. Raimondi and M.Zobov

SUMMARY: Introduction: the need for short bunches at the IP; A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP SUMMARY: Introduction: the need for short bunches at the IP; The strong RF focusing concept; Equilibrium energy spread in a strong RF focused ring; Energy acceptance in a strong RF focused ring; Bunch lengthening and m-wave regime: preliminary considerations and simulations; Choice of the optimal working point for a super F-factory design based on the strong RF focusing concept

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP Hour-glass effect by* Squeezing the vertical dimensions by reducing the vertical b-function is effective only if the bunch length is also reduced to about the b* value. Bunch length

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

Longitudinal Lattice Model A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP Longitudinal Lattice Model Drift Space RF Cavity = long. thin lens

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP DAFNE rms longitudinal phase space DE/E DE/E DAFNE separatrix

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP DE/E

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP DE/E DE/E z[m] z[m] z[m] z[m]

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP DE/E z[m] z[m]

Bunch length Centroid position A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP Bunch length Centroid position

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP WORKING POINT OPTIMIZATION FOR A SUPER F-FACTORY DESIGN BASED ON THE STRONG RF FOCUSING The Working Point of a strongly RF focused ring consists in a set of values for the following fundamental parameters to obtain the required bunch length sz at the IP :

1. One turn synchrotron phase advance A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 1. One turn synchrotron phase advance Once the values of the bunch lengths at the IP and RF have been chosen, the one-turn synchrotron phase advance is automatically defined. To get sz(RF)  12 mm, the following values of synchrotron phase advance are required:

2. Bunch energy spread in the strong RF focusing regime A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 2. Bunch energy spread in the strong RF focusing regime The bunch energy spread rapidly grows with the phase advance and its maximum acceptable value is limited by: The F-resonance width; The machine energy acceptance (quantum lifetime) To avoid F production degradation: sE/E  1.4 ‰

3. One turn normalized path elongation R56(L)=acL A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 3. One turn normalized path elongation R56(L)=acL The expression giving the bunch length at the IP can be conveniently written as: that immediately leads to: Since the values of both sz(RF) and sE/E do not depend much on the IP bunch length goal, the optimal one-turn path elongation is almost independent on the goal itself.

4. Bunch “natural”energy spread ( “weak” focusing regime, m<<1) A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 4. Bunch “natural”energy spread ( “weak” focusing regime, m<<1) The bunch energy spread in the strong RF focusing regime is related to the natural value according to: smooth case, |r|=kost. and R56 linearly increasing in the arcs with The ring natural energy spread is not much a flexible parameter, varying in the 0.40.5 ‰ range for different lattice design at the F energy. We assume:

4. Bunch “natural”energy spread ( cnt’d) A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 4. Bunch “natural”energy spread ( cnt’d) To keep the energy spread growth at the desired values a proper lattice design is needed. To reduce the value of the A function with respect to the smooth case, it is convenient to concentrate more the synchrotron emission in the low bl regions of the ring (near the IP), and vice-versa to increase it (more emission near the RF). For example the curvature radius of the bendings in half of the ring on the RF side can be changed by a factor k. The A value varies as shown.

5-6. RF Voltage and Wavelength A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 5-6. RF Voltage and Wavelength Once the synchrotron phase advance m and the normalized path elongation acL have been defined, the ratio between the RF voltage and wavelength is fixed by the relation: Short wavelengths (high frequencies) require lower voltages, but reduce the energy acceptance. Therefore there is a minimum acceptable wavelength value corresponding to the minimum acceptable energy acceptance. If an additional harmonic RF system is used, the total gradient is given by two contributions, so that:

5-6. RF Voltage and Wavelength (cnt’d) A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP 5-6. RF Voltage and Wavelength (cnt’d) Since acL is almost equal in the three cases, the required voltages and the resulting acceptances are similar too. To have at least 1% of acceptance at the IP position, RF frequencies higher than 500 MHz can not be used unless an extra gradient is provided by an harmonic RF voltage to restore the proper synchrotron phase advance.

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP Summary Table

A possible candidate cavity A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP A possible candidate cavity Tested beyond 2.5 MV/module Operated in high beam loading Length ≈ 2.2 m /module

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP CONCLUSIONS: The strong RF focusing concept has been illustrated and analyzed by means of the linear transfer matrix formalism; Longitudinal optical functions have been derived, showing that the bunch length varies along the ring and may be minimized at the IP; The longitudinal emittance and energy spread of the bunch equilibrium distribution, whose analytical expressions have been validated by comparison with results of multiparticle tracking simulations, diverge as the phase advance approaches 180°; The energy acceptance is no longer an invariant. It is a function of the azimuth and assumes its maximum value in the longitudinal waist (IP) To avoid bunch lengthening and µ-wave instability, the location of the impedance is the crucial point. Good results can be obtained if the ring wake is almost completely concentred near the RF cavity, where the bunch is longest.

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP CONCLUSIONS (cnt’d): There are no many degrees of freedom in the choice of the WP parameters; The “wiggling machine” (a zero-order reference design presented in this workshop) with small modifications can already provide IP bunch length down to 2 mm; RF frequencies higher than 500 MHz are not suitable since a too small RF acceptance would result (unless harmonic cavities in the lengthening regime are used); 23 mm seems a reasonable goal, but 1 mm requires exotic lattices. Many beam physics aspects remain to be seriously studied (especially for 1 mm goal)

A. Gallo, The Strong RF Focusing: a possible approach to get short bunches at the IP CONCLUSIONS (final): IS SOME ACCELERATOR GROUP WILLING OF MAKING A STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT ON ITS MACHINE ?