Performance of Smart Antennas and PCF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /269 Submission September 2000 Steven Gray, NokiaSlide 1 Performance of Smart Antennas and PCF Ari Alastalo, Steven Gray and Venkatesh.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
IEEE 802 Series LAN/MAN Bridging & Management Logical Link Control CSMA/CD (Ethernet) Token Bus Token Ring Wireless.
12- OFDM with Multiple Antennas. Multiple Antenna Systems (MIMO) TX RX Transmit Antennas Receive Antennas Different paths Two cases: 1.Array Gain: if.
NTU Confidential Baseband Transceiver Design for the DVB-Terrestrial Standard Baseband Transceiver Design for the DVB-Terrestrial Standard Advisor : Tzi-Dar.
NTUEE Confidential Toward MIMO MC-CDMA Speaker : Pei-Yun Tsai Advisor : Tzi-Dar Chiueh 2004/10/25.
G. Orfanos, ComNets, RWTH Aachen University Multihop MAC Protocol for MC-CDMA based WLANs confidential Georgios Orfanos RWTH Aachen University, Chair of.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Adaptive IEEE MAC Protocol for high efficiency MC-CDMA WLANs 15. FFV Workshop 21. November 2008 Dr.-Ing. Georgios Orfanos 1G.Orfanos, 15. FFV Workshop,
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
Doc.: IEEE /0125r0 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Interference Detection for Sensing IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Introduction to OFDM and Cyclic prefix
Doc.: IEEE /227 Submission May 2001 S. Gray, NokiaSlide 1 Throughput and Loss Packet Performance of DCF with Variable Transmit Power Steven D.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
Technology training (Session 6)
Advanced Wireless Communication Systems
Outline Introduction Type of Multiplexing FDMA TDMA CDMA Future Work
Balancing Uplink and Downlink Delay of VoIP Traffic in WLANs
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
Support for Advance Antennas & Techniques in WNM
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Wireless LANs Wireless proliferating rapidly.
Considerations on WUP bandwidth and CCA
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Shamir Stein Ackerman Elad Lifshitz Timor Israeli
HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions
Satoru Hori, Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata, Masahiro Morikura
Evaluation of a Novel Low Complexity Smart Antenna for Wireless LAN Systems T.J. Harrold*, D.C. Kemp†, M.A. Beach*, C. Williams*, M. Philippakis† and M.W.
An Overview of ax Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer.
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area NetworksTM
EECS 228a, Spring 2006 Shyam Parekh
Considerations on AP Coordination
Why 20 MHz Channelization in HTSG?
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Joe Morrissey Motorola
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Considerations on AP Coordination
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput.
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Qingwen Liu, Student Member, IEEE Xin Wang, Member, IEEE,
Performance Simulations
OBSS issue and simulation scenarios in TGac
802.11ac Channel Modeling Authors: Jan 19, 2009 Month Year
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Wireless LAN (WLAN) Wireless Ethernet Bluetooth.
Date Submitted: [March, 2007 ]
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
MU-MIMO codebook based transmission flow in IEEE802.11ay
Interference Detection for Sensing
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
UL MU Random Access Analysis
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
5-GHz Unified Protocol (5-UP) Proposal OFDM Extensions for a
Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY
Experiments on Wireless VR for EHT
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Why 20 MHz Channelization in HTSG?
Presentation transcript:

Performance of Smart Antennas and PCF 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com Performance of Smart Antennas and PCF Vinayak Nandikal Courtesy: Nokia Research Center Vinayak Nandikal

20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Introduction IEEE802.11 will be an important method for providing high rate low mobility data services While existing capacity may seem high, particularly for IEEE802.11a, the enterprise environment may experience capacity limits Antenna technologies offer a means to boast IEEE802.11 capacity without changing the existing PHYs Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 What is a SMART Antenna? AP STA Antenna that adjusts its beam pattern based upon the channel and interference between AP and STA Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

Approach to Model Performance 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Approach to Model Performance Measure channel using a channel sounder to determine Multipath power profile as a function of time Signal-to-interference ratio Simulate PHY to obtain PER information as a function of channel measurements and the number of packets delivered as a function of time Use PER, number of packets delivered by the PHY as a function of time and models of real-time traffic to examine delay and throughput using a PHY with and without smart antennas PCF is used for delivery of audio and video packets Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

PHY Simulation Parameters 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 PHY Simulation Parameters Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

PHY Channel Sounder Approach 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 PHY Channel Sounder Approach 127 chip pn sequence is transmitted at 5.3 GHz with a bandpass bandwidth of 30 MHz A 32 element array with 0.5 wavelength space is used to downconvert the transmitted pn sequence Snap shots of the delay spread are written to memory and stored on a hard disk For further information see: Jarmo Kivinen, Timo O. Korhonen, Pauli Aikio, Ralf Gruber, Pertti Vainikainen, and Sven-Gustav Häggman, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 39-44, 1999. Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

Smart Antenna Operation (5GHz) 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Smart Antenna Operation (5GHz) RF A/D FFT Antenna Combining Weight Calculation Decoding STA OFDM Symbol Index Subcarrier Uplink Operation D/A RF IFFT Antenna Weighting Coding & Modulation STA Downlink Operation Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Channel Correlation 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1 time [ms] amplitude correlation coefficient average over TX positions Ruoholahti Heikkiläntie Airport Airport 2 The figure to the right shows the correlation coefficient for different measurement environments For smart antenna operation, the AP needs the ability to probe the channel between any STA and AP Note: Ruholahti and Heikkiläntie are Nokia office buildings Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

MAC Simulation Parameters 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 MAC Simulation Parameters Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

Traffic Model: All traffic measured in data-units/slot-time 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Traffic Model: All traffic measured in data-units/slot-time 1 data-unit takes 1 slot-time for transmission Max traffic in network = 1.0 Audio and video traffic originates from “calls” made by the user Calls are Poisson distributed; once placed, each call generates periodic packet traffic Mean inter-call-arrival-time controls load on the network Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

Traffic Model (cont.): Real-time traffic load = 20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Traffic Model (cont.): Real-time traffic load = apkt_sz: audio packet size vpkt_sz: video packet size int_call_arvl_time: mean intercall arrival time (8:1 ratio between audio and video calls) int_apkt_arvl_time, int_vpkt_arvl_time: arrival time between audio packets and video packets respectively acalls, vcalls: number of audio anc video calls respectively Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal

Throughput & Latency Curves: Audio Packets 20 September 2018 Throughput & Latency Curves: Audio Packets Packets/Seconds Packets/Second Normalized Througput PCF Latencies 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10 4 10 -4 -3 -2 -1 No SDMA 3-channel SDMA DCF:PCF = 1:1 Audio Packets 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 DCF:PCF = 1:1 Vinayak Nandikal

Throughput & Latency Curves: Audio Packets 20 September 2018 Throughput & Latency Curves: Audio Packets Packets/Seconds Packets/Second Normalized Throughput PCF Latencies 1 2 3 4 x 10 10 -4 -3 -2 -1 No SDMA 3-channel SDMA DCF:PCF = 1:3 Audio Packets 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Aduio Packets Vinayak Nandikal

Throughput & Latency Curves: Video Packets 20 September 2018 Throughput & Latency Curves: Video Packets Packets/Seconds Packets/Second Normalized Throughput PCF Latencies 100 200 300 400 500 10 -4 -3 -2 -1 No SDMA 3-channel SDMA DCF:PCF = 1:1 Video Packets 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Vinayak Nandikal

Throughput & Latency Curves: Video Packets 20 September 2018 Throughput & Latency Curves: Video Packets Packets/Seconds Packets/Second Normalized Throughput PCF Latencies 200 400 600 800 10 -4 -3 -2 -1 No SDMA 3-channel SDMA DCF:PCF = 1:3 Video Packets 100 300 500 700 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Vinayak Nandikal

New Control Frame Subtypes for Smart Antennas 20 September 2018 New Control Frame Subtypes for Smart Antennas AP to STA A message requesting the STA to transmit a preamble (null frame) for channel estimation Channel Id Request STA to AP A response to the above request Channel Id Response Duration RA TA FCS Message Fields Frame Control Vinayak Nandikal

Remove Polling Dependence 20 September 2018 Remove Polling Dependence The existing standards reads, "During each CFP, the PC shall issue polls to a subset of the STAs on the polling list in order by ascending AID value". Vinayak Nandikal

20 September 2018 vinayak.nandi@gmail.com 20 September 2018 Conclusions Particularly in a large enterprise environment, smart antennas can help boast capacity Wireless office replacement for "wired" Ethernet Public service networks such as airports Changes to the existing MAC are minor to enable antenna technologies in IEEE802.11a networks SDMA is not for all WLANS Multiple antennas cost additional money for the AP that may not be required in homes and small businesses Vinayak Nandikal Vinayak Nandikal