Reduce Distribution System Pressure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Gathering & Processing Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental.
Advertisements

Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Casper, WY August 30, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
Methane Losses from Compressors Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Northern Natural Gas Company, INGAA, CECO, Heath Consultants,
Natural Gas STAR Program. 2 The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and the oil and.
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
Optimizing Nitrogen Rejection Units
Aging infrastructure? Where’s it a problem and what’s the fix? New England Gas Workers Association Mark McDonald President.
EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting – Subpart W Fugitive methane emissions John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting – Subpart.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Seals Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission Interstate.
Natural Gas STAR Partner Experiences Duke Energy Gas Transmission By: David Felcman Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop September 22, 2004 Houston,
Replacing Infrastructure: Pipeline Safety and Methane Reduction Benefits 2013 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting: June 12, 2013.
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-line Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Production Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
1Last Updated: October, 2011 Overview for Distribution Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Sponsors – American Petroleum Institute and ExxonMobil Production Company September 21,
Natural Gas STAR Partner Experiences Northern Natural Gas Company By: Larry “Rick” Loveless Technology Transfer Workshop June 8, 2005 Midland, Texas.
Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Oklahoma City, OK April 20, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
Mayors’ Council on Pipeline Safety 2015 Conference May 14, 2015 Lesley Fleischman Clean Air Task Force.
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
Processor Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors Association,
TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE EUROPEAN NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY Development of a Eurogas-Marcogaz Methodology for Estimation of Methane Emissions Angelo Riva.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer Workshop Bill Barrett.
Directed Inspection & Maintenance At Compressor and Gate Stations
Energy Efficiency in Industrial and Commercial Facilities 2003 Energy and Environmental Conference September 16, 2003.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Smart Automation Well Venting Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum.
NiSource Pipeline Group Natural Gas Star Experience Presented at the Natural Gas Star Users Conference June 3, 2003 By Gregory Lago NiSource EH&S Group.
Natural Gas STAR and NiSource A Winning Partnership Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits
Page 1 Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits Part 2: Is Recovery Profitable? p Savings associated with pressure reduction p Costs.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
Producer Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Natural Gas STAR Program Gas Processing Technology Transfer Workshop Oklahoma City, OK April 22, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners Murphy Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group,
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Aging Infrastructure Management and Challenges Sue Fleck Vice President Pipeline Safety Trust “Getting to Zero’ Conference 2011.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Transmission Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation and.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
EPA Natural Gas Star Natural Gas Distribution Merrillville, IN June 3, 2003.
NiSource Natural Gas STAR Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 3, 2003 Merrillville, Indiana.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
Natural Gas STAR Program epa.gov/gasstar. The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and.
1 Senate Bill 1371 Workshop Sacramento April 12, 2016 California Air Resources Board Oil & Gas and GHG Mitigation Branch California Air Resources Board.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
This module will dig deeper into Smart Grid implementation issues. It will focus on two key issue of particular interest to the PNW: 1)How the Smart Grid.
2018 LTSA Workshop August 2017 RPG Meeting Welcome to.
Solar Power Applications
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
Natural Gas: Market Trends in Supply and Consumption
Methane Emissions Management at TransCanada PipeLines
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Methane Emissions Management at TransCanada PipeLines
Module 4 Smart Grid Implementation Issues
Leak Management Best Practices
October 9, 2014 Kenneth W. Yagelski Managing Director Gas Supply
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Richard Meyer Managing Director, Energy Analysis August.
Voluntary SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership: Recent Achievements and Planned Activities Volha Roshchanka 14 November, 2018.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Gina DeFrancesco Clean Energy Analyst | May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Reduce Distribution System Pressure Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Distribution Technology Transfer Teleconference American Gas Association, Southern Gas Association, Northeast Gas Association, Ohio Gas Association, Texas Gas Association, Western Energy Institute, and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program May 17, 2005

EPA Natural Gas STAR The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and the oil and natural gas industry designed to cost-effectively reduce methane emissions from natural gas operations 338 Bcf methane savings since 1993 49 AGA members have partnered with Natural Gas STAR 26 SGA members have partnered with Natural Gas STAR AGA and SGA members report savings of over 123 Bcf ($371 million) gas since 1993 62% of AGA comes from January 2005 presentation we gave to AGA, based on number of customers. All other numbers come from the endorser “web sites” pdf files we created in December 2004.

U.S. Industry Participation 117 Program Partners 62% of transmission 26 partners 60% of distribution 48 partners 51% of production 32 partners 63% of processing 12 partners Numbers as of 4/29/05 (last partner added was to production sector. Southwestern Energy Company)

Reduce Distribution System Pressure: Agenda Part 1: Problem Description Methane Losses Methane Recovery Discussion Questions Part 2: Is Methane Recovery Profitable? Savings Costs Economics Part 3: Industry Experience

Distribution Sector Methane Losses Distribution sector is 19% of natural gas and oil methane emissions Emissions 1 Bcf Oil Downstream 2 Bcf Reductions Processing 36 Bcf Production 148 Bcf 7 Bcf Distribution 68 Bcf 24 Bcf Transmission & Storage 101 Bcf Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2003 18 Bcf

Methane Losses by Source Nearly all distribution sector methane losses are unintended fugitive leaks Protected Steel Mains/Services 3 Bcf Other Sources 2 Bcf M&R Stations 17 Bcf Customer Meter Leaks 6 Bcf Plastic Mains/Services 8 Bcf Cast Iron Mains 8 Bcf Unprotected Steel Mains/Services 13 Bcf Regulator Stations 11 Bcf

What is the Problem? Fugitive leaks Lead to higher maintenance costs Cause product loss Peak demand pressures are set for extended periods, but necessary only a small fraction of the time Higher than necessary system pressure intensifies leakage Increases maintenance costs and product loss Increases “under-registered gas”

Distribution System Fugitive Sources Facilities Gate Stations: Reduce pressure and meter gas from transmission lines District Regulators: Further reduce pressure for customer use Lines: High Pressure Mains: Carry gas from gate stations to customer districts Low Pressure Mains: Carry gas from district regulators to service lines Services: Branch-off from high or low pressure mains to customer meter

Methane Recovery Gas STAR Partners adjust system pressures for shorter intervals to better match current demand Minimizes leaks and product loss Reduces maintenance Reduces under-registered gas

Methane Recovery Two approaches to match pressure with demand Manual, periodic pressure regulation Change of procedures to adjust DR set points Low capital cost, higher operating costs Automatic, near real-time pressure regulation Installation of control systems to adjust DR set points High capital cost, lower operating cost

Manual Pressure Regulation Adjust DR set-points more frequently during scheduled maintenance Example: from annual to semi-annual Example: from semi-annual to quarterly Example: from quarterly to monthly adjustments Partners sometimes change pressure in steps to avoid system shock or pressure oscillations

Automatic Pressure Regulation Automatic regulation can adjust DRs multiple times per day, more closely matching real demand with the lowest necessary pressures Leads to lowest leak rates, less maintenance, less under-registered gas Multiple degrees of automation technology Lowest cost: clocking and temperature solenoids Medium cost: remote terminal unit control systems Highest cost: centralized supervisory computer

Automatic Pressure Regulation Alternatives AUTOMATION FEATURES

Review of Part 1 Questions? Methane emissions Distribution systems and pressure regulation Methods for matching pressure to demand Questions?