Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders Developments Dutch PIN Community for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011

Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance Subjects Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance 20/9/18

PIN membership and associations Goal 2010 Milan 5 Organizations 2011 Prague 7 Organizations Talks with: 20/9/18

Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance Subjects Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance 20/9/18

Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect Developments 2011 (1/2) Covering vision, standards, governance SECTOR Standards Regulators Vision Taskforce Intelligent Grids National Main issue Standards & Interoperability Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect Re-use Share Regional EU Taskforce SG International FERC Organize & prioritize Make & harmonize Regulate 20/9/18

Developments 2011 (2/2) 2010-07 Final document Dutch TF Smart Grid 2011-01 Final public consultation document Dutch TF Smart Grid PIN input was used for future steps on standards and interoperability 2011-02/06 AgentschapNL is forming SG platform. Forseen tasks: Dutch Conceptual model.(similar to NIST) Selection criteria for standards and determine priorities Shortlist of relevant standards for the Netherlands Ensuring contribution on international standards (Based on comply or explain on int. standards and best practices) DSO’s and TSO are no competitors, we seek synergy Taskforce Intelligent Grids 20/9/18

Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance Subjects Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance 20/9/18

Our ambitions for 2011 Support the Dutch SG platform on: Delivering a set of standards with core and high relevance for the Netherlands (incl. E-Govermental standards) Deliver a set of business issues which can be supported by those standards. Examples of data exchange: between gridoperator and regulator (CODATA) between TSO an DSO between DSO and Serviceproviders (= Project DURF digital exchange of revision data of grid components and topology) Delivering a set of selection-criteria for adopting standards Delivering a development-proces description that can be used by the dutch grid operators. 20/9/18

Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance Subjects Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance 20/9/18

CIM Governance (1/4) Applying CIM… Before: Project Current: Project Time, knowledge and other constraints Non-standard interface Current: Project Architecture: use standard Time, knowledge and other constraints Non-standard interface Desired: Project Architecture: use standard Knowledge available Standards reused Standardized interface 20/9/18

CIM Governance (2/4) Common Information Model Experts organized Formal representation Managed by IEC CIM CIM model manager CIMug IEC 57 International standardization Regional CIM Profile Regional profile manager ENTSO-E Data expert group ENTSO-E SDC/SOC/MC Regional standardization National CIM profiles National model manager PIN NEC 57 (NEN working group) National standardization Local CIM Local data manager Local CIM experts Participation in groups Local standardization * CIM represents CIM and other standards like 61850, BAG (Dutch), GBKN (Dutch), KVK (Dutch), etc. 20/9/18

CIM Governance (3/4) The idea… National standardization committee TC 57 PIN Subject representative Organized knowledge Organized knowledge Companies 20/9/18

CIM Governance (4/4) Challenges to the PIN Group and to company standardization coordinators: How to unite the CIM (and other standards) knowledge in a kind of competence center? How do you organize that? How to ascertain that CIM interpretations are the same within all parts of the company / group of companies? How to organize business and IT stakeholders around the CIM? How do you prevent ‘islands’ to be formed? I would like to come back from Prague with a set of working (or best) practices. 20/9/18