Technology Transfer Principles and Practice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safe System Approach Eric Howard.
Advertisements

1 ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL March 2007 Status Report on Comments to NHTSA’s Proposed Rule and Next Steps for WP.29 Informal document No. WP ,
The Green Building Act of 2006: Transforming the Market DC Department of Housing and Community Development Prepared by the DC Department of Housing and.
Preparing Winning FLC Award Nominations: Do’s and Don’ts The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for the public.
“informed fleet decisions made easy”. Overview About Us ECO, Inc. is the world's leading engine and vehicle emissions certification consulting firm,
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Improving Fuel Economy and Air Quality on the I-5 Corridor Sharon Banks, CEO
Participating from a Distance Bringing the TRB Annual Meeting Home to the Washington State Department of Transportation Leni Oman Director Office of Research.
An Introduction to the Council Venue Presenter Date.
How Do Standards and Conformance Boost Business?Slide 1 Why We All Need to be Involved in the Standards Development and Conformity Assessment Process.
Cleancities.energy.gov Clean Cities…… We Can Help! CNG Workshop Bronx Zoo March 13, 2012 Mark Smith Mark S. Smith Technology Deployment Manager Clean Cities,
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
Bulk Tanker Emergency Response: Road Transport Workforce Profile, Skilling and Retention Challenges 6 September 2012 Cameron Baker, General Manager – Skills.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
The Palestinian Perspective on the Cooperation in R&D in Sustainable Urban Mobility Khaled Al-Sahili An-Najah National University Palestine Rabat 19 May.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
Third Sector Capital Partners, Inc. Boston & San Francisco | (617) | | This document is the property.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
FLEET MANAGEMENT – A CONTINUING CHALLENGE Nigel Trotman, Business Relationship Manager, Whitbread Plc.
Making Work Zones Work Better Chung Eng Work Zone Mobility & Safety Team Office of Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department.
2 ITS Facts and Figures Founded in 1948 by the California state legislature in response to the deferred maintenance of transportation facilities during.
Building the Knowledge Base How to Successfully Evaluate A TCSP Project presented by William M. Lyons U.S. Department of Transportation/Volpe Center and.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
Korea Pedestrian Working Group The Korea Transport Institute Economic Appraisal for Technical Regulation on Pedestrian Protection (I): focused on head.
Quantifying the Value of Research in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research and Development Division AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 29, 2015 Portland, Oregon.
European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Developing an European Interior Headform Test Procedure T. Langner on behalf of EEVC WG 13 19th International.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Sharing Data: Issues and Opportunities Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting January 22, 2006 Leni Oman Director of Transportation Research Washington.
(c) IRU Academy 2011 Developing professional Training in Syria: IRU Recommendation Damascus, 9 th February 2011 Haydar Özkan IRU General Delegate to the.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Mainstream Fiber Networks partnership Proposal
The Groundwork for the Future Arizona’s Open Arms Approach to Autonomous Vehicle Development August 23, 2017 Matt Clark, Transportation Policy Advisor.
The U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
Nevada Driving Summit May 25, 2016
NHTSA's Crash Investigation Sampling System
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
Fact: Standards Mean Business To our company and our bottom line
First Nation Waste Management Initiative
Protecting Pedestrians and Bicyclists, One Safer Truck at a Time
Youth CareerConnect Programs:
Green Supply Chain Management
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
New Findings on Crash Avoidance Technology
Performance Measure Index
Connected Vehicle Technology
Accelerating the Adoption of Innovation
Energy Savings Insurance
Tyson Rupnow, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Director, Research
by Erica Chen, Oscar Bautista, Ericka Saldana
Overcoming Barriers to Implement Research Projects
Edgewood Partners Insurance Center – Prophix story
@ 2017 Global Market Insight, Inc. USA. All Rights Reservedwww.gminsights.com Forklift Market growth outlook with industry review and forecasts
Basic Concept of 5S-KAIZEN-TQM Approach
SMARTE PROGRAM Saving money and reducing truck emissions
Natural Gas is Moving Forward
Energy Savings Insurance
Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Research Programs
Magnolia Hospitality Group – Prophix partner story
EU Tyres labelling scheme
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Professional Driver Training Uganda Project
GLOBALIZATION COMPETITION COMPLEXITY What to Say
Proposal Processing Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Fact: Standards Mean Business To industry, government and the bottom line
Road Wise Occupant Protection Passenger Safety
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the
Case Study Workshop.
Presentation transcript:

Technology Transfer Principles and Practice Santiago Navarro (OST-R) and Alex Epstein, Ph.D. (Volpe Center) AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 26, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Research and Technology John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

Technology Transfer Principles Understand adopter needs Understand the technology Address barriers to adoption Communicate value

Technology Transfer Principles

Technology Transfer Practice Truck Side Guards for Safety and Fuel Savings The Technology and the T2 Experience

Understand adopter needs There are two types of adopter needs. Functional – Reduce fatal crashes, reduce liability, improve public image Decisional – Funding or mandate to invest in side guards, convincing management/officials, labor buy-in, availability of U.S. suppliers

Understand the technology Front Rear Volpe researched existing international standards, added its own research, and developed a consistent best practice set of minimum specifications and performance requirements for U.S. side guards that anyone can manufacture and install.

Understand the technology Washington, DC San Francisco Volpe also rolled up its sleeves and worked directly with major U.S. cities on implementing the technology. At the beginning it was truck by truck. There are many different ways that our partner cities and private truck fleets have adapted and adopted the Volpe specification to their own needs. Since it’s not a regulation (like an FMVSS), there is flexibility in how to install this safety technology for minimal impact on O&M and innovating the design. Know where to draw the line and allow exemptions or a bit of slack for some vehicle types. Portland, OR Boston, MA Cambridge, MA New York City

Addressing barriers to adoption Barriers to adoption have included: Liability aversion due to lack of a regulatory standard in U.S. But the Volpe specification and technical report does provide a national voluntary standard. Implicitly admitting that there existed a safety issue AND a known solution. Once you upgrade safety of one truck, and people ask why you didn’t do them all, or why you didn’t do it sooner. For more exotic vehicles, O&M Deployed Deployment TBD Deployed separately

Communicate value Sideguards Sideskirts Decrease bike/ped fatalities & serious injuries Road spray suppression Environmental & fuel savings at higher speeds Decrease bike/ped fatalities and serious injuries Environmental & fuel savings at higher speeds We’ve used many ways to communicate value to the adopter. Easy-to-use website with all side guard resources Infographics, two-pager, YouTube video, and full technical reports Met with city fleet managers (NYC, Boston, SF) Presented at IIHS, TRB, FLC and other conferences together with early adopters Trucking industry magazine pieces (with early adopters) Targeted outreach to potential municipality and state adopters Free consultations with interested MPOs, private truck fleets, and large logistics customers such as hospitals Sideguards Sideskirts

Communicate value Let’s take a look at how we communicate the safety value specifically.

Questions? Alexander Epstein Santiago Navarro alexander.epstein@dot.gov 617.494.2539 Santiago Navarro santiago.navarro@dot.gov 202.366.0849 www.volpe.dot.gov/our-work/truck-side-guards-resource-page http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/57000/57400/57403/Transportation_TechTransfer_Primer.pdf